3,585 research outputs found

    Review of recent issues on humor field

    Get PDF
    The paper presents a brief review of some original issues in English, gained by the main argument-the theme of humor from the standpoint of different scientific approaches, and from the perspective of various aspects of the consideration of humor. Humor occupies a significant place in the spiritual life of social communities and all spheres of society are permeated by this phenomenon. The papers of both established scholars and novice ones from different countries are summarized. An attempt is made to differentiate the works according to the research areas and to present them in the light of general research lines and further perspectives in the study of humor

    Review of recent issues on humor field

    Get PDF
    The paper presents a brief review of some original issues in English, gained by the main argument-the theme of humor from the standpoint of different scientific approaches, and from the perspective of various aspects of the consideration of humor. Humor occupies a significant place in the spiritual life of social communities and all spheres of society are permeated by this phenomenon. The papers of both established scholars and novice ones from different countries are summarized. An attempt is made to differentiate the works according to the research areas and to present them in the light of general research lines and further perspectives in the study of humor

    Meeting the needs of the learning disabled-gifted child : a problem of non-identification

    Get PDF
    The purpose of this study was to ascertain possible solutions to remedy the pervasive problem of the failure to identify and meet the needs of learning disabled-gifted children. Using a literature review, the writer sought to determine the characteristics of learning disabled-gifted children, perceived barriers to the identification of learning disabled-gifted children, and programming approaches that would best meet the needs of these unique learners

    Anthropologists Are Talking – About The Anthropocene

    Get PDF

    Negotiating (Inter)Disciplinary Identity in Integrative Graduate Education

    Get PDF
    abstract: Identity, or peoples’ situated sense of self, can be conceptualized and operationalized in a myriad of ways, including, among others, a person’s gender, socioeconomic status, degree of expertise, nationality, and disciplinary training. This study conceptualizes identity as fluid and constructed through social interaction with others, where individuals ask themselves “Who am I?” in relation to the people around them. Such a discursive conceptualization argues that we can observe peoples’ performance of identity through the close reading and examination of their talk and text. By discursively drawing boundaries around descriptions of “Who I am,” people inherently attribute value to preferred identities and devalue undesirable, “other” selves. This study analyzes ten workshops from the Toolbox Project conducted with graduate student scientists participating in the Integrative Graduate Education Research Traineeship (IGERT) program. The emotional tone, mood, and atmosphere of shared humor and laughter emerged as a context through which collaborators tested the limits of different identities and questioned taken for granted assumptions about their disciplinary identities and approaches to research. Through jokes, humorous comments, sarcasm, and laughter, students engaged in three primary forms of othering: 1) unifying the entire group against people outside the group, 2) differentiating group members against each other, and 3) differentiating oneself in comparison to the rest of the group. I use action-implicative discourse analysis to reconstruct these communicative practices at three levels—problem, technical, and philosophical—and explore the implications of group laughter and humor as sites of “othering” discursive strategies in graduate students’ efforts to negotiate and differentiate identity in the context of integrative collaboration.Dissertation/ThesisDoctoral Dissertation Communication 201

    Conference Report on "Entangled Memories: Remembering the Holocaust in a Global Age"

    Get PDF

    How do we collaborate? A look into Maine\u27s Sustainable Ecological Aquaculture Network

    Get PDF
    As a society we realize that the dynamic needs of science and society are often complex and interdependent and that there is a need to work with and across diverse expertise and practices in order to create the development of new methods and to provide innovative solutions to socially relevant work. Thus, we call collaborative research efforts into action. Maine’s Sustainable Ecological Aquaculture Network (SEANET) is such an endeavor, as it is a collaborative effort traversing a nexus of complex, dynamic challenges in Maine, including issues related to socio-economic shifts, climate change, and declining capture fisheries. While SEANET’s plan to incorporate a collaborative approach aims to achieve an inspiring, sustainable end-goal it provides only a high-level map for how to get there, and includes few explicit directions. Following the need to better understand such an effort, this thesis considers the interdisciplinary collaboration on the team and provides both action-orientated and theoretical insights. The following thesis is an analysis of the individuals and teams involved in this sustainability science minded project. More specifically, this research informs strategies of improvement for the SEANET team while also adding to the scholarly conversation on interdisciplinary collaborations through the use of both quantitative methods and qualitative methods. In the first part of this study, an online survey was distributed to assess the current communication preferences and engagement needs of the team. Compiled into a technical report, this chapter is aligned with the needs of team, and the NSF strategic plan in place, to foster informed collaborative processes moving forward. The second part of this study entailed the use of interviews to better understand how team members contend with deeply normative dimensions of interdisciplinary success. This chapter provides insight into how scientists and research agencies involved in sustainability science minded interdisciplinary teams might shape research agendas and their relationship to society moving forward
    corecore