422 research outputs found
OBDD-Based Representation of Interval Graphs
A graph can be described by the characteristic function of the
edge set which maps a pair of binary encoded nodes to 1 iff the nodes
are adjacent. Using \emph{Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams} (OBDDs) to store
can lead to a (hopefully) compact representation. Given the OBDD as an
input, symbolic/implicit OBDD-based graph algorithms can solve optimization
problems by mainly using functional operations, e.g. quantification or binary
synthesis. While the OBDD representation size can not be small in general, it
can be provable small for special graph classes and then also lead to fast
algorithms. In this paper, we show that the OBDD size of unit interval graphs
is and the OBDD size of interval graphs is $O(\
| V \ | \log \ | V \ |)\Omega(\ | V \ | \log
\ | V \ |)O(\log \ | V \ |)O(\log^2 \ | V \ |)$ operations and
evaluate the algorithms empirically.Comment: 29 pages, accepted for 39th International Workshop on Graph-Theoretic
Concepts 201
Ackermann Encoding, Bisimulations, and OBDDs
We propose an alternative way to represent graphs via OBDDs based on the
observation that a partition of the graph nodes allows sharing among the
employed OBDDs. In the second part of the paper we present a method to compute
at the same time the quotient w.r.t. the maximum bisimulation and the OBDD
representation of a given graph. The proposed computation is based on an
OBDD-rewriting of the notion of Ackermann encoding of hereditarily finite sets
into natural numbers.Comment: To appear on 'Theory and Practice of Logic Programming
MALL proof equivalence is Logspace-complete, via binary decision diagrams
Proof equivalence in a logic is the problem of deciding whether two proofs
are equivalent modulo a set of permutation of rules that reflects the
commutative conversions of its cut-elimination procedure. As such, it is
related to the question of proofnets: finding canonical representatives of
equivalence classes of proofs that have good computational properties. It can
also be seen as the word problem for the notion of free category corresponding
to the logic.
It has been recently shown that proof equivalence in MLL (the multiplicative
with units fragment of linear logic) is PSPACE-complete, which rules out any
low-complexity notion of proofnet for this particular logic.
Since it is another fragment of linear logic for which attempts to define a
fully satisfactory low-complexity notion of proofnet have not been successful
so far, we study proof equivalence in MALL- (multiplicative-additive without
units fragment of linear logic) and discover a situation that is totally
different from the MLL case. Indeed, we show that proof equivalence in MALL-
corresponds (under AC0 reductions) to equivalence of binary decision diagrams,
a data structure widely used to represent and analyze Boolean functions
efficiently.
We show these two equivalent problems to be LOGSPACE-complete. If this
technically leaves open the possibility for a complete solution to the question
of proofnets for MALL-, the established relation with binary decision diagrams
actually suggests a negative solution to this problem.Comment: in TLCA 201
SDDs are Exponentially More Succinct than OBDDs
Introduced by Darwiche (2011), sentential decision diagrams (SDDs) are
essentially as tractable as ordered binary decision diagrams (OBDDs), but tend
to be more succinct in practice. This makes SDDs a prominent representation
language, with many applications in artificial intelligence and knowledge
compilation. We prove that SDDs are more succinct than OBDDs also in theory, by
constructing a family of boolean functions where each member has polynomial SDD
size but exponential OBDD size. This exponential separation improves a
quasipolynomial separation recently established by Razgon (2013), and settles
an open problem in knowledge compilation
- …