19 research outputs found

    The Chromatic Number of the Disjointness Graph of the Double Chain

    Full text link
    Let PP be a set of n≥4n\geq 4 points in general position in the plane. Consider all the closed straight line segments with both endpoints in PP. Suppose that these segments are colored with the rule that disjoint segments receive different colors. In this paper we show that if PP is the point configuration known as the double chain, with kk points in the upper convex chain and l≥kl \ge k points in the lower convex chain, then k+l−⌊2l+14−12⌋k+l- \left\lfloor \sqrt{2l+\frac{1}{4}} - \frac{1}{2}\right\rfloor colors are needed and that this number is sufficient

    Embedding Four-directional Paths on Convex Point Sets

    Full text link
    A directed path whose edges are assigned labels "up", "down", "right", or "left" is called \emph{four-directional}, and \emph{three-directional} if at most three out of the four labels are used. A \emph{direction-consistent embedding} of an \mbox{nn-vertex} four-directional path PP on a set SS of nn points in the plane is a straight-line drawing of PP where each vertex of PP is mapped to a distinct point of SS and every edge points to the direction specified by its label. We study planar direction-consistent embeddings of three- and four-directional paths and provide a complete picture of the problem for convex point sets.Comment: 11 pages, full conference version including all proof

    Counting Carambolas

    Full text link
    We give upper and lower bounds on the maximum and minimum number of geometric configurations of various kinds present (as subgraphs) in a triangulation of nn points in the plane. Configurations of interest include \emph{convex polygons}, \emph{star-shaped polygons} and \emph{monotone paths}. We also consider related problems for \emph{directed} planar straight-line graphs.Comment: update reflects journal version, to appear in Graphs and Combinatorics; 18 pages, 13 figure

    Bounds on the maximum multiplicity of some common geometric graphs

    Get PDF
    We obtain new lower and upper bounds for the maximum multiplicity of some weighted and, respectively, non-weighted common geometric graphs drawn on n points in the plane in general position (with no three points collinear): perfect matchings, spanning trees, spanning cycles (tours), and triangulations. (i) We present a new lower bound construction for the maximum number of triangulations a set of n points in general position can have. In particular, we show that a generalized double chain formed by two almost convex chains admits {\Omega}(8.65^n) different triangulations. This improves the bound {\Omega}(8.48^n) achieved by the double zig-zag chain configuration studied by Aichholzer et al. (ii) We present a new lower bound of {\Omega}(12.00^n) for the number of non-crossing spanning trees of the double chain composed of two convex chains. The previous bound, {\Omega}(10.42^n), stood unchanged for more than 10 years. (iii) Using a recent upper bound of 30^n for the number of triangulations, due to Sharir and Sheffer, we show that n points in the plane in general position admit at most O(68.62^n) non-crossing spanning cycles. (iv) We derive lower bounds for the number of maximum and minimum weighted geometric graphs (matchings, spanning trees, and tours). We show that the number of shortest non-crossing tours can be exponential in n. Likewise, we show that both the number of longest non-crossing tours and the number of longest non-crossing perfect matchings can be exponential in n. Moreover, we show that there are sets of n points in convex position with an exponential number of longest non-crossing spanning trees. For points in convex position we obtain tight bounds for the number of longest and shortest tours. We give a combinatorial characterization of the longest tours, which leads to an O(nlog n) time algorithm for computing them

    An Upper Bound for the Number of Rectangulations of a Planar Point Set

    Full text link
    We prove that every set of n points in the plane has at most 17n17^n rectangulations. This improves upon a long-standing bound of Ackerman. Our proof is based on the cross-graph charging-scheme technique.Comment: 8 pages, 5 figure

    Counting and Enumerating Crossing-free Geometric Graphs

    Full text link
    We describe a framework for counting and enumerating various types of crossing-free geometric graphs on a planar point set. The framework generalizes ideas of Alvarez and Seidel, who used them to count triangulations in time O(2nn2)O(2^nn^2) where nn is the number of points. The main idea is to reduce the problem of counting geometric graphs to counting source-sink paths in a directed acyclic graph. The following new results will emerge. The number of all crossing-free geometric graphs can be computed in time O(cnn4)O(c^nn^4) for some c<2.83929c < 2.83929. The number of crossing-free convex partitions can be computed in time O(2nn4)O(2^nn^4). The number of crossing-free perfect matchings can be computed in time O(2nn4)O(2^nn^4). The number of convex subdivisions can be computed in time O(2nn4)O(2^nn^4). The number of crossing-free spanning trees can be computed in time O(cnn4)O(c^nn^4) for some c<7.04313c < 7.04313. The number of crossing-free spanning cycles can be computed in time O(cnn4)O(c^nn^4) for some c<5.61804c < 5.61804. With the same bounds on the running time we can construct data structures which allow fast enumeration of the respective classes. For example, after O(2nn4)O(2^nn^4) time of preprocessing we can enumerate the set of all crossing-free perfect matchings using polynomial time per enumerated object. For crossing-free perfect matchings and convex partitions we further obtain enumeration algorithms where the time delay for each (in particular, the first) output is bounded by a polynomial in nn. All described algorithms are comparatively simple, both in terms of their analysis and implementation
    corecore