On symmetric intersecting families

We make some progress on a question of Babai from the 1970s, namely: for $n, k \in \mathbb{N}$ with $k \le n/2$, what is the largest possible cardinality $s(n,k)$ of an intersecting family of $k$-element subsets of $\{1,2,\ldots,n\}$ admitting a transitive group of automorphisms? We give upper and lower bounds for $s(n,k)$, and show in particular that $s(n,k) = o (\binom{n-1}{k-1})$ as $n \to \infty$ if and only if $k = n/2 - \omega(n)(n/\log n)$ for some function $\omega(\cdot)$ that increases without bound, thereby determining the threshold at which `symmetric' intersecting families are negligibly small compared to the maximum-sized intersecting families. We also exhibit connections to some basic questions in group theory and additive number theory, and pose a number of problems.Comment: Minor change to the statement (and proof) of Theorem 1.4; the authors thank Nathan Keller and Omri Marcus for pointing out a mistake in the previous versio

ON SYMMETRIC 3-WISE INTERSECTING FAMILIES

A family of sets is said to be symmetric if its automorphism group is transitive, and $3$-wise intersecting if any three sets in the family have nonempty intersection. Frankl conjectured in 1981 that if $\mathcal{A}$ is a symmetric $3$-wise intersecting family of subsets of $\{1,2,\dots,n\}$, then $|\mathcal{A}| = o(2^n)$. Here, we give a short proof of Frankl's conjecture using a 'sharp threshold' result of Friedgut and Kalai.Comment: 7 pages, typo corrected in description of 'tree' construction in Section 3. Proc. Amer. Math. So

On symmetric intersecting families of vectors

A family of vectors $A \subset [k]^n$ is said to be intersecting if any two elements of $A$ agree on at least one coordinate. We prove, for fixed $k \ge 3$, that the size of a symmetric intersecting subfamily of $[k]^n$ is $o(k^n)$, which is in stark contrast to the case of the Boolean hypercube (where $k =2$). Our main contribution addresses limitations of existing technology: while there is now some spectral machinery, developed by Ellis and the third author, to tackle extremal problems in set theory involving symmetry, this machinery relies crucially on the interplay between up-sets and biased product measures on the Boolean hypercube, features that are notably absent in the problem at hand; here, we describe a method for circumventing these barriers.Comment: 6 pages; It has been brought to our attention that our main result (with slightly worse estimates) may be deduced from earlier work of Dinur, Friedgut and Regev, and this revision acknowledges this fac

Cross-intersecting families and primitivity of symmetric systems

Let $X$ be a finite set and $\mathfrak p\subseteq 2^X$, the power set of $X$, satisfying three conditions: (a) $\mathfrak p$ is an ideal in $2^X$, that is, if $A\in \mathfrak p$ and $B\subset A$, then $B\in \mathfrak p$; (b) For $A\in 2^X$ with $|A|\geq 2$, $A\in \mathfrak p$ if $\{x,y\}\in \mathfrak p$ for any $x,y\in A$ with $x\neq y$; (c) $\{x\}\in \mathfrak p$ for every $x\in X$. The pair $(X,\mathfrak p)$ is called a symmetric system if there is a group $\Gamma$ transitively acting on $X$ and preserving the ideal $\mathfrak p$. A family $\{A_1,A_2,\ldots,A_m\}\subseteq 2^X$ is said to be a cross-$\mathfrak{p}$-family of $X$ if $\{a, b\}\in \mathfrak{p}$ for any $a\in A_i$ and $b\in A_j$ with $i\neq j$. We prove that if $(X,\mathfrak p)$ is a symmetric system and $\{A_1,A_2,\ldots,A_m\}\subseteq 2^X$ is a cross-$\mathfrak{p}$-family of $X$, then $$\sum_{i=1}^m|{A}_i|\leq\left\{ \begin{array}{cl} |X| & \hbox{if $m\leq \frac{|X|}{\alpha(X,\, \mathfrak p)}$,} \\ m\, \alpha(X,\, \mathfrak p) & \hbox{if $m\geq \frac{|X|}{\alpha{(X,\, \mathfrak p)}}$,} \end{array}\right.$$ where $\alpha(X,\, \mathfrak p)=\max\{|A|:A\in\mathfrak p\}$. This generalizes Hilton's theorem on cross-intersecting families of finite sets, and provides analogs for cross-$t$-intersecting families of finite sets, finite vector spaces and permutations, etc. Moreover, the primitivity of symmetric systems is introduced to characterize the optimal families.Comment: 15 page

Conway groupoids, regular two-graphs and supersimple designs

A $2-(n,4,\lambda)$ design $(\Omega, \mathcal{B})$ is said to be supersimple if distinct lines intersect in at most two points. From such a design, one can construct a certain subset of Sym$(\Omega)$ called a "Conway groupoid". The construction generalizes Conway's construction of the groupoid $M_{13}$. It turns out that several infinite families of groupoids arise in this way, some associated with 3-transposition groups, which have two additional properties. Firstly the set of collinear point-triples forms a regular two-graph, and secondly the symmetric difference of two intersecting lines is again a line. In this paper, we show each of these properties corresponds to a group-theoretic property on the groupoid and we classify the Conway groupoids and the supersimple designs for which both of these two additional properties hold.Comment: 17 page

Regular Intersecting Families

We call a family of sets intersecting, if any two sets in the family intersect. In this paper we investigate intersecting families $\mathcal{F}$ of $k$-element subsets of $[n]:=\{1,\ldots, n\},$ such that every element of $[n]$ lies in the same (or approximately the same) number of members of $\mathcal{F}$. In particular, we show that we can guarantee $|\mathcal{F}| = o({n-1\choose k-1})$ if and only if $k=o(n)$.Comment: 15 pages, accepted versio

A factorization theorem for lozenge tilings of a hexagon with triangular holes

In this paper we present a combinatorial generalization of the fact that the number of plane partitions that fit in a $2a\times b\times b$ box is equal to the number of such plane partitions that are symmetric, times the number of such plane partitions for which the transpose is the same as the complement. We use the equivalent phrasing of this identity in terms of symmetry classes of lozenge tilings of a hexagon on the triangular lattice. Our generalization consists of allowing the hexagon have certain symmetrically placed holes along its horizontal symmetry axis. The special case when there are no holes can be viewed as a new, simpler proof of the enumeration of symmetric plane partitions.Comment: 20 page