9,989 research outputs found
A Framework for Program Development Based on Schematic Proof
Often, calculi for manipulating and reasoning about programs can be recast as calculi for synthesizing programs. The difference involves often only a slight shift of perspective: admitting metavariables into proofs. We propose that such calculi should be implemented in logical frameworks that support this kind of proof construction and that such an implementation can unify program verification and synthesis. Our proposal is illustrated with a worked example developed in Paulson's Isabelle system. We also give examples of existent calculi that are closely related to the methodology we are proposing and others that can be profitably recast using our approach
Synthesizing Functional Reactive Programs
Functional Reactive Programming (FRP) is a paradigm that has simplified the
construction of reactive programs. There are many libraries that implement
incarnations of FRP, using abstractions such as Applicative, Monads, and
Arrows. However, finding a good control flow, that correctly manages state and
switches behaviors at the right times, still poses a major challenge to
developers. An attractive alternative is specifying the behavior instead of
programming it, as made possible by the recently developed logic: Temporal
Stream Logic (TSL). However, it has not been explored so far how Control Flow
Models (CFMs), as synthesized from TSL specifications, can be turned into
executable code that is compatible with libraries building on FRP. We bridge
this gap, by showing that CFMs are indeed a suitable formalism to be turned
into Applicative, Monadic, and Arrowized FRP. We demonstrate the effectiveness
of our translations on a real-world kitchen timer application, which we
translate to a desktop application using the Arrowized FRP library Yampa, a web
application using the Monadic threepenny-gui library, and to hardware using the
Applicative hardware description language ClaSH.Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1712.0024
Applying Formal Methods to Networking: Theory, Techniques and Applications
Despite its great importance, modern network infrastructure is remarkable for
the lack of rigor in its engineering. The Internet which began as a research
experiment was never designed to handle the users and applications it hosts
today. The lack of formalization of the Internet architecture meant limited
abstractions and modularity, especially for the control and management planes,
thus requiring for every new need a new protocol built from scratch. This led
to an unwieldy ossified Internet architecture resistant to any attempts at
formal verification, and an Internet culture where expediency and pragmatism
are favored over formal correctness. Fortunately, recent work in the space of
clean slate Internet design---especially, the software defined networking (SDN)
paradigm---offers the Internet community another chance to develop the right
kind of architecture and abstractions. This has also led to a great resurgence
in interest of applying formal methods to specification, verification, and
synthesis of networking protocols and applications. In this paper, we present a
self-contained tutorial of the formidable amount of work that has been done in
formal methods, and present a survey of its applications to networking.Comment: 30 pages, submitted to IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorial
A Universal Machine for Biform Theory Graphs
Broadly speaking, there are two kinds of semantics-aware assistant systems
for mathematics: proof assistants express the semantic in logic and emphasize
deduction, and computer algebra systems express the semantics in programming
languages and emphasize computation. Combining the complementary strengths of
both approaches while mending their complementary weaknesses has been an
important goal of the mechanized mathematics community for some time. We pick
up on the idea of biform theories and interpret it in the MMTt/OMDoc framework
which introduced the foundations-as-theories approach, and can thus represent
both logics and programming languages as theories. This yields a formal,
modular framework of biform theory graphs which mixes specifications and
implementations sharing the module system and typing information. We present
automated knowledge management work flows that interface to existing
specification/programming tools and enable an OpenMath Machine, that
operationalizes biform theories, evaluating expressions by exhaustively
applying the implementations of the respective operators. We evaluate the new
biform framework by adding implementations to the OpenMath standard content
dictionaries.Comment: Conferences on Intelligent Computer Mathematics, CICM 2013 The final
publication is available at http://link.springer.com
A Refinement Calculus for Logic Programs
Existing refinement calculi provide frameworks for the stepwise development
of imperative programs from specifications. This paper presents a refinement
calculus for deriving logic programs. The calculus contains a wide-spectrum
logic programming language, including executable constructs such as sequential
conjunction, disjunction, and existential quantification, as well as
specification constructs such as general predicates, assumptions and universal
quantification. A declarative semantics is defined for this wide-spectrum
language based on executions. Executions are partial functions from states to
states, where a state is represented as a set of bindings. The semantics is
used to define the meaning of programs and specifications, including parameters
and recursion. To complete the calculus, a notion of correctness-preserving
refinement over programs in the wide-spectrum language is defined and
refinement laws for developing programs are introduced. The refinement calculus
is illustrated using example derivations and prototype tool support is
discussed.Comment: 36 pages, 3 figures. To be published in Theory and Practice of Logic
Programming (TPLP
- âŠ