A temporal semantics for Nilpotent Minimum logic

In [Ban97] a connection among rough sets (in particular, pre-rough algebras) and three-valued {\L}ukasiewicz logic {\L}3 is pointed out. In this paper we present a temporal like semantics for Nilpotent Minimum logic NM ([Fod95, EG01]), in which the logic of every instant is given by {\L}3: a completeness theorem will be shown. This is the prosecution of the work initiated in [AGM08] and [ABM09], in which the authors construct a temporal semantics for the many-valued logics of G\"odel ([G\"od32], [Dum59]) and Basic Logic ([H\'aj98]).Comment: 19 pages, 2 table

First-order Nilpotent Minimum Logics: first steps

Following the lines of the analysis done in [BPZ07, BCF07] for first-order G\"odel logics, we present an analogous investigation for Nilpotent Minimum logic NM. We study decidability and reciprocal inclusion of various sets of first-order tautologies of some subalgebras of the standard Nilpotent Minimum algebra. We establish a connection between the validity in an NM-chain of certain first-order formulas and its order type. Furthermore, we analyze axiomatizability, undecidability and the monadic fragments.Comment: In this version of the paper the presentation has been improved. The introduction section has been rewritten, and many modifications have been done to improve the readability; moreover, numerous references have been added. Concerning the technical side, some proofs has been shortened or made more clear, but the mathematical content is substantially the same of the previous versio

On completeness results for predicate lukasiewicz, product, gödel and nilpotent minimum logics expanded with truth-constants

In this paper we deal with generic expansions of first-order predicate logics of some left-continuous t-norms with a countable set of truth-constants. Besides already known results for the case of Lukasiewicz logic, we obtain new conservativeness and completeness results for some other expansions. Namely, we prove that the expansions of predicate Product, Gödel and Nilpotent Minimum logics with truth-constants are conservative, which already implies the failure of standard completeness for the case of Product logic. In contrast, the expansions of predicate Gödel and Nilpotent Minimum logics are proved to be strong standard complete but, when the semantics is restricted to the canonical algebra, they are proved to be complete only for tautologies. Moreover, when the language is restricted to evaluated formulae we prove canonical completeness for deductions from finite sets of premises.Peer Reviewe

On rational weak Nilpotent Minimum logics

In this paper we investigate extensions of Gödel and Nilpotent Minimum logics by adding rational truth-values as truth constants in the language and by adding corresponding book-keeping axioms for the truth-constants. We also investigate the rational extensions of some parametric families of Weak Nilpotent Minimum logics, weaker than both Gödel and Nilpotent Minimum logics. Weak and strong standard completeness of these logics are studied in general and in particular when we restrict ourselves to formulas of the kind r̄ → φ, where r is a rational in [0, 1] and φ is a formula without rational truth-constants. © 2006 Old City Publishing, Inc.Authors are indebted to Petr Hájek for pointing out and solving some technical problems in the original proof of standard completeness of RG. Authors acknowledge partial support of the Spanish project MULOG TIN2004-07933-C03-01Peer Reviewe

On Rational Weak Nilpotent Minimum Logics

In this paper we investigate some extensions of Weak Nilpotent Minimum logic, a weaker logic than both Godel and Nilpotent Minimum logics, by adding rational truth-values as truth constants in the language and by adding corresponding book-keeping axioms for the truth-constants. Weak and strong standard completeness of these logics are studied in general and when we restrict ourselves to formulas of the kind r → ϕ, where r is a rational in [0, 1] and ϕ is a formula without rational truth-constants

On rational weak Nilpotent Minimum logics

In this paper we investigate extensions of Gödel and Nilpotent Minimum logics by adding rational truth-values as truth constants in the language and by adding corresponding book-keeping axioms for the truth-constants. We also investigate the rational extensions of some parametric families of Weak Nilpotent Minimum logics, weaker than both Gödel and Nilpotent Minimum logics. Weak and strong standard completeness of these logics are studied in general and in particular when we restrict ourselves to formulas of the kind r̄ → φ, where r is a rational in [0, 1] and φ is a formula without rational truth-constants. © 2006 Old City Publishing, Inc