60,963 research outputs found
A dependent nominal type theory
Nominal abstract syntax is an approach to representing names and binding
pioneered by Gabbay and Pitts. So far nominal techniques have mostly been
studied using classical logic or model theory, not type theory. Nominal
extensions to simple, dependent and ML-like polymorphic languages have been
studied, but decidability and normalization results have only been established
for simple nominal type theories. We present a LF-style dependent type theory
extended with name-abstraction types, prove soundness and decidability of
beta-eta-equivalence checking, discuss adequacy and canonical forms via an
example, and discuss extensions such as dependently-typed recursion and
induction principles
Nominal Abstraction
Recursive relational specifications are commonly used to describe the
computational structure of formal systems. Recent research in proof theory has
identified two features that facilitate direct, logic-based reasoning about
such descriptions: the interpretation of atomic judgments through recursive
definitions and an encoding of binding constructs via generic judgments.
However, logics encompassing these two features do not currently allow for the
definition of relations that embody dynamic aspects related to binding, a
capability needed in many reasoning tasks. We propose a new relation between
terms called nominal abstraction as a means for overcoming this deficiency. We
incorporate nominal abstraction into a rich logic also including definitions,
generic quantification, induction, and co-induction that we then prove to be
consistent. We present examples to show that this logic can provide elegant
treatments of binding contexts that appear in many proofs, such as those
establishing properties of typing calculi and of arbitrarily cascading
substitutions that play a role in reducibility arguments.Comment: To appear in the Journal of Information and Computatio
Priorities Without Priorities: Representing Preemption in Psi-Calculi
Psi-calculi is a parametric framework for extensions of the pi-calculus with
data terms and arbitrary logics. In this framework there is no direct way to
represent action priorities, where an action can execute only if all other
enabled actions have lower priority. We here demonstrate that the psi-calculi
parameters can be chosen such that the effect of action priorities can be
encoded.
To accomplish this we define an extension of psi-calculi with action
priorities, and show that for every calculus in the extended framework there is
a corresponding ordinary psi-calculus, without priorities, and a translation
between them that satisfies strong operational correspondence. This is a
significantly stronger result than for most encodings between process calculi
in the literature.
We also formally prove in Nominal Isabelle that the standard congruence and
structural laws about strong bisimulation hold in psi-calculi extended with
priorities.Comment: In Proceedings EXPRESS/SOS 2014, arXiv:1408.127
Heterogeneous substitution systems revisited
Matthes and Uustalu (TCS 327(1-2):155-174, 2004) presented a categorical
description of substitution systems capable of capturing syntax involving
binding which is independent of whether the syntax is made up from least or
greatest fixed points. We extend this work in two directions: we continue the
analysis by creating more categorical structure, in particular by organizing
substitution systems into a category and studying its properties, and we
develop the proofs of the results of the cited paper and our new ones in
UniMath, a recent library of univalent mathematics formalized in the Coq
theorem prover.Comment: 24 page
Relating Nominal and Higher-order Abstract Syntax Specifications
Nominal abstract syntax and higher-order abstract syntax provide a means for
describing binding structure which is higher-level than traditional techniques.
These approaches have spawned two different communities which have developed
along similar lines but with subtle differences that make them difficult to
relate. The nominal abstract syntax community has devices like names,
freshness, name-abstractions with variable capture, and the new-quantifier,
whereas the higher-order abstract syntax community has devices like
lambda-binders, lambda-conversion, raising, and the nabla-quantifier. This
paper aims to unify these communities and provide a concrete correspondence
between their different devices. In particular, we develop a
semantics-preserving translation from alpha-Prolog, a nominal abstract syntax
based logic programming language, to G-, a higher-order abstract syntax based
logic programming language. We also discuss higher-order judgments, a common
and powerful tool for specifications with higher-order abstract syntax, and we
show how these can be incorporated into G-. This establishes G- as a language
with the power of higher-order abstract syntax, the fine-grained variable
control of nominal specifications, and the desirable properties of higher-order
judgments.Comment: To appear in PPDP 201
A Lambda Term Representation Inspired by Linear Ordered Logic
We introduce a new nameless representation of lambda terms inspired by
ordered logic. At a lambda abstraction, number and relative position of all
occurrences of the bound variable are stored, and application carries the
additional information where to cut the variable context into function and
argument part. This way, complete information about free variable occurrence is
available at each subterm without requiring a traversal, and environments can
be kept exact such that they only assign values to variables that actually
occur in the associated term. Our approach avoids space leaks in interpreters
that build function closures.
In this article, we prove correctness of the new representation and present
an experimental evaluation of its performance in a proof checker for the
Edinburgh Logical Framework.
Keywords: representation of binders, explicit substitutions, ordered
contexts, space leaks, Logical Framework.Comment: In Proceedings LFMTP 2011, arXiv:1110.668
- …