3,554 research outputs found
Approximating Edit Distance Within Constant Factor in Truly Sub-Quadratic Time
Edit distance is a measure of similarity of two strings based on the minimum
number of character insertions, deletions, and substitutions required to
transform one string into the other. The edit distance can be computed exactly
using a dynamic programming algorithm that runs in quadratic time. Andoni,
Krauthgamer and Onak (2010) gave a nearly linear time algorithm that
approximates edit distance within approximation factor .
In this paper, we provide an algorithm with running time
that approximates the edit distance within a constant
factor
On k-Column Sparse Packing Programs
We consider the class of packing integer programs (PIPs) that are column
sparse, i.e. there is a specified upper bound k on the number of constraints
that each variable appears in. We give an (ek+o(k))-approximation algorithm for
k-column sparse PIPs, improving on recent results of and
. We also show that the integrality gap of our linear programming
relaxation is at least 2k-1; it is known that k-column sparse PIPs are
-hard to approximate. We also extend our result (at the loss
of a small constant factor) to the more general case of maximizing a submodular
objective over k-column sparse packing constraints.Comment: 19 pages, v3: additional detail
A new Lenstra-type Algorithm for Quasiconvex Polynomial Integer Minimization with Complexity 2^O(n log n)
We study the integer minimization of a quasiconvex polynomial with
quasiconvex polynomial constraints. We propose a new algorithm that is an
improvement upon the best known algorithm due to Heinz (Journal of Complexity,
2005). This improvement is achieved by applying a new modern Lenstra-type
algorithm, finding optimal ellipsoid roundings, and considering sparse
encodings of polynomials. For the bounded case, our algorithm attains a
time-complexity of s (r l M d)^{O(1)} 2^{2n log_2(n) + O(n)} when M is a bound
on the number of monomials in each polynomial and r is the binary encoding
length of a bound on the feasible region. In the general case, s l^{O(1)}
d^{O(n)} 2^{2n log_2(n) +O(n)}. In each we assume d>= 2 is a bound on the total
degree of the polynomials and l bounds the maximum binary encoding size of the
input.Comment: 28 pages, 10 figure
- …