64 research outputs found

    On absoluteness of categoricity in abstract elementary classes

    Get PDF
    "Vegeu el resum a l'inici del document del fitxer adjunt"

    Amalgamation, absoluteness, and categoricity

    Get PDF
    "Vegeu el resum a l'inici del document del fitxer adjunt"

    Beginning of stability theory for Polish Spaces

    Full text link
    We consider stability theory for Polish spaces and more generally for definable structures. We succeed to prove existence of indiscernibles under reasonable conditions

    Indeterminateness and `The' Universe of Sets: Multiversism, Potentialism, and Pluralism

    Get PDF
    In this article, I survey some philosophical attitudes to talk concerning `the' universe of sets. I separate out four different strands of the debate, namely: (i) Universism, (ii) Multiversism, (iii) Potentialism, and (iv) Pluralism. I discuss standard arguments and counterarguments concerning the positions and some of the natural mathematical programmes that are suggested by the various views

    Non-Absoluteness of Model Existence at ω\aleph_\omega

    Full text link
    In [FHK13], the authors considered the question whether model-existence of Lω1,ωL_{\omega_1,\omega}-sentences is absolute for transitive models of ZFC, in the sense that if VWV \subseteq W are transitive models of ZFC with the same ordinals, φV\varphi\in V and V"φ is an Lω1,ω-sentence"V\models "\varphi \text{ is an } L_{\omega_1,\omega}\text{-sentence}", then V"φ has a model of size α"V \models "\varphi \text{ has a model of size } \aleph_\alpha" if and only if W"φ has a model of size α"W \models "\varphi \text{ has a model of size } \aleph_\alpha". From [FHK13] we know that the answer is positive for α=0,1\alpha=0,1 and under the negation of CH, the answer is negative for all α>1\alpha>1. Under GCH, and assuming the consistency of a supercompact cardinal, the answer remains negative for each α>1\alpha>1, except the case when α=ω\alpha=\omega which is an open question in [FHK13]. We answer the open question by providing a negative answer under GCH even for α=ω\alpha=\omega. Our examples are incomplete sentences. In fact, the same sentences can be used to prove a negative answer under GCH for all α>1\alpha>1 assuming the consistency of a Mahlo cardinal. Thus, the large cardinal assumption is relaxed from a supercompact in [FHK13] to a Mahlo cardinal. Finally, we consider the absoluteness question for the α\aleph_\alpha-amalgamation property of Lω1,ωL_{\omega_1,\omega}-sentences (under substructure). We prove that assuming GCH, α\aleph_\alpha-amalgamation is non-absolute for 1<α<ω1<\alpha<\omega. This answers a question from [SS]. The cases α=1\alpha=1 and α\alpha infinite remain open. As a corollary we get that it is non-absolute that the amalgamation spectrum of an Lω1,ωL_{\omega_1,\omega}-sentence is empty

    A presentation theorem for continuous logic and Metric Abstract Elementary Classes

    Full text link
    We give a presentation theorem for continuous first-order logic and Metric Abstract Elementary classes in terms of Lω1,ωL_{\omega_1, \omega} and Abstract Elementary Classes, respectively. This presentation is accomplished by analyzing dense subsets that are closed under functions. We extend this correspondence to types and saturation

    The set-theoretic multiverse

    Full text link
    The multiverse view in set theory, introduced and argued for in this article, is the view that there are many distinct concepts of set, each instantiated in a corresponding set-theoretic universe. The universe view, in contrast, asserts that there is an absolute background set concept, with a corresponding absolute set-theoretic universe in which every set-theoretic question has a definite answer. The multiverse position, I argue, explains our experience with the enormous diversity of set-theoretic possibilities, a phenomenon that challenges the universe view. In particular, I argue that the continuum hypothesis is settled on the multiverse view by our extensive knowledge about how it behaves in the multiverse, and as a result it can no longer be settled in the manner formerly hoped for.Comment: 35 page

    Strong subgroup chains and the Baer-Specker group

    Full text link
    Examples are given of non-elementary properties that are preserved under C-filtrations for various classes C of Abelian groups. The Baer-Specker group is never the union of a chain of proper subgroups with cotorsionfree quotients. Cotorsion-free groups form an abstract elementary class (AEC). The Kaplansky invariants of the Baer-Specker group are used to determine the AECs defined by the perps of the Baer-Specker quotient groups that are obtained by factoring the Baer-Specker group B of a ZFC extension by the Baer-Specker group A of the ground model, under various hypotheses, yielding information about its stability spectrum.Comment: 12 page
    corecore