16,089 research outputs found
The self-organization of combinatoriality and phonotactics in vocalization systems
This paper shows how a society of agents can self-organize a shared vocalization system that is
discrete, combinatorial and has a form of primitive phonotactics, starting from holistic inarticulate
vocalizations. The originality of the system is that: (1) it does not include any explicit pressure for
communication; (2) agents do not possess capabilities of coordinated interactions, in particular they
do not play language games; (3) agents possess no specific linguistic capacities; and (4) initially
there exists no convention that agents can use. As a consequence, the system shows how a primitive
speech code may bootstrap in the absence of a communication system between agents, i.e. before the
appearance of language
From Holistic to Discrete Speech Sounds: The Blind Snow-Flake Maker Hypothesis
Sound is a medium used by humans to carry information.
The existence of this kind of
medium is a pre-requisite for language. It is organized
into a code, called speech, which
provides a repertoire of forms that is shared in each
language community. This code is necessary to support the linguistic
interactions that allow humans to communicate.
How then may a speech code be formed prior to the
existence of linguistic interactions?
Moreover, the human speech code is characterized by several
properties: speech is digital and compositional (vocalizations
are made of units re-used systematically in other syllables);
phoneme inventories have precise regularities as well as
great diversity in human languages; all the speakers of a
language community categorize sounds in the same manner,
but each language has its own system of categorization,
possibly very different from every other.
How can a speech code with these properties form?
These are the questions we will approach in the paper. We will
study them using the method of the artificial. We will
build a society of artificial agents, and study what mechanisms
may provide answers. This will not prove directly what mechanisms
were used for humans, but rather give ideas about what kind
of mechanism may have been used. This allows us to shape the
search space of possible answers, in particular by showing
what is sufficient and what is not necessary.
The mechanism we present is based on a low-level model of
sensory-motor interactions. We show that the integration of certain very
simple and non language-specific neural devices
allows a population of agents to build a speech code that
has the properties mentioned above. The originality is
that it pre-supposes neither a functional pressure for
communication, nor the ability to have coordinated
social interactions (they do not play language or imitation
games). It relies on the self-organizing properties of a generic
coupling between perception and production both
within agents, and on the interactions between agents
The Self-Organization of Speech Sounds
The speech code is a vehicle of language: it defines
a set of forms used by a community to carry information.
Such a code is necessary to support the linguistic
interactions that allow humans to communicate.
How then may a speech code be formed prior to the
existence of linguistic interactions?
Moreover, the human speech code is discrete and compositional,
shared by all the individuals of a community but different
across communities, and phoneme inventories are characterized by
statistical regularities. How can a speech code with these properties form?
We try to approach these questions in the paper,
using the ``methodology of the artificial''. We
build a society of artificial agents, and detail a mechanism that
shows the formation of a discrete speech code without pre-supposing
the existence of linguistic capacities or of coordinated interactions.
The mechanism is based on a low-level model of
sensory-motor interactions. We show that the integration of certain very
simple and non language-specific neural devices
leads to the formation of a speech code that
has properties similar to the human speech code.
This result relies on the self-organizing properties of a generic
coupling between perception and production
within agents, and on the interactions between agents.
The artificial system helps us to develop better intuitions on how speech
might have appeared, by showing how self-organization
might have helped natural selection to find speech
From Analogue to Digital Vocalizations
Sound is a medium used by humans to carry information.
The existence of this kind of
medium is a pre-requisite for language. It is organized
into a code, called speech, which
provides a repertoire of forms that is shared in each
language community. This code is necessary to support the linguistic
interactions that allow humans to communicate.
How then may a speech code be formed prior to the
existence of linguistic interactions?
Moreover, the human speech code is characterized by several
properties: speech is digital and compositional (vocalizations
are made of units re-used systematically in other syllables);
phoneme inventories have precise regularities as well as
great diversity in human languages; all the speakers of a
language community categorize sounds in the same manner,
but each language has its own system of categorization,
possibly very different from every other.
How can a speech code with these properties form?
These are the questions we will approach in the paper. We will
study them using the method of the artificial. We will
build a society of artificial agents, and study what mechanisms
may provide answers. This will not prove directly what mechanisms
were used for humans, but rather give ideas about what kind
of mechanism may have been used. This allows us to shape the
search space of possible answers, in particular by showing
what is sufficient and what is not necessary.
The mechanism we present is based on a low-level model of
sensory-motor interactions. We show that the integration of certain very
simple and non language-specific neural devices
allows a population of agents to build a speech code that
has the properties mentioned above. The originality is
that it pre-supposes neither a functional pressure for
communication, nor the ability to have coordinated
social interactions (they do not play language or imitation
games). It relies on the self-organizing properties of a generic
coupling between perception and production both
within agents, and on the interactions between agents
Extracting finite structure from infinite language
This paper presents a novel connectionist memory-rule based model capable of learning the finite-state properties of an input language from a set of positive examples. The model is based upon an unsupervised recurrent self-organizing map [T. McQueen, A. Hopgood, J. Tepper, T. Allen, A recurrent self-organizing map for temporal sequence processing, in: Proceedings of Fourth International Conference in Recent Advances in Soft Computing (RASC2002), Nottingham, 2002] with laterally interconnected neurons. A derivation of functionalequivalence theory [J. Hopcroft, J. Ullman, Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages and Computation, vol. 1, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1979] is used that allows the model to exploit similarities between the future context of previously memorized sequences and the future context of the current input sequence. This bottom-up learning algorithm binds functionally related neurons together to form states. Results show that the model is able to learn the Reber grammar [A. Cleeremans, D. Schreiber, J. McClelland, Finite state automata and simple recurrent networks, Neural Computation, 1 (1989) 372–381] perfectly from a randomly generated training set and to generalize to sequences beyond the length of those found in the training set
- …