Key distribution and distributed intrusion detection system in wireless sensor network

This thesis proposes a security solution in key management and Intrusion Detection System (IDS) for wireless sensor networks. It addresses challenges of designing in energy and security requirement. Since wireless communication consumes the most energy in sensor network, transmissions must be used efficiently. We propose Hint Key Distribution (HKD) for key management and Adaptive IDS for distributing activated IDS nodes and cooperative operation of these two protocols. HKD protocol focuses on the challenges of energy, computation and security. It uses a hint message and key chain to consume less energy while self-generating key can secure the secret key. It is a proposed solution to key distribution in sensor networks. Adaptive IDS uses threshold and voting algorithm to distribute IDS through the network. An elected node is activated IDS to monitor its network and neighbors. A threshold is used as a solution to reduce number of repeated activations of the same node. We attempt to distribute the energy use equally across the network. In a cooperative protocol, HKD and Adaptive IDS exchange information in order to adjust to the current situation. The level of alert controls the nature of the interaction between the two protocols

Online) An Open Access

ABSTRACT The main concern in Wireless Sensor Networks is how to handle with their limited energy resources. The performance of Wireless Sensor Networks strongly depends on their lifetime. As a result, Dynamic Power Management approaches with the purpose of reduction of energy consumption in sensor nodes, after deployment and designing of the network. Recently, there have been a strong interest to use intelligent tools especially Neural Networks in energy efficient approaches of Wireless Sensor Networks, due to their simple parallel distributed computation, distributed storage, data robustness, auto-classification of sensor nodes and sensor reading. This paper presents a new centralized adaptive Energy Based Clustering protocol through the application of Self organizing map neural networks (called EBC-S) which can cluster sensor nodes, based on multi parameters; energy level and coordinates of sensor nodes. We applied some maximum energy nodes as weights of SOM map units; so that the nodes with higher energy attract the nearest nodes with lower energy levels. Therefore, formed clusters may not necessarily contain adjacent nodes. The new algorithm enables us to form energy balanced clusters and equally distribute energy consumption. Simulation results and comparison with previous protocols (LEACH and LEA2C) prove that our new algorithm is able to extend the lifetime of the network. Keywords: Energy Based Clustering, Self Organizing Map Neural Networks, Wireless Sensor Networks INTRODUCTION The most important difference of Wireless Sensor Network (WSNs) with other wireless networks may be constraints of their resources, especially energy which usually arise from small size of sensor nodes and their batteries which is a prerequisite to WSNs main applications. The main and most important reason of WSNs creation was continuous monitoring of environments where are too hard or impossible for human to access or stay. So there is often low possibility to replace or recharge the dead nodes as well. The other important requirement is that we need a continuous monitoring so the lifetime and network coverage of these networks are our great concerns. As a result, as energy conservation is the main concern in WSNs, but also it should be gained with balanced distribution in whole network space. Balanced distribution of energy in whole network will lead to balanced death of nodes in all regions preventing from lacking network coverage in a rather large part of the network. Energy conservation should be gained by wisely management of energy sources. Several energy conservation schemes have been proposed in the literature while there is a comprehensive survey of energy conservation methods for WSNs and the taxonomy of all into three main approaches (duty-cycling, data reduction, and mobility based approaches

AMCTD: Adaptive Mobility of Courier nodes in Threshold-optimized DBR Protocol for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks

In dense underwater sensor networks (UWSN), the major confronts are high error probability, incessant variation in topology of sensor nodes, and much energy consumption for data transmission. However, there are some remarkable applications of UWSN such as management of seabed and oil reservoirs, exploration of deep sea situation and prevention of aqueous disasters. In order to accomplish these applications, ignorance of the limitations of acoustic communications such as high delay and low bandwidth is not feasible. In this paper, we propose Adaptive mobility of Courier nodes in Threshold-optimized Depth-based routing (AMCTD), exploring the proficient amendments in depth threshold and implementing the optimal weight function to achieve longer network lifetime. We segregate our scheme in 3 major phases of weight updating, depth threshold variation and adaptive mobility of courier nodes. During data forwarding, we provide the framework for alterations in threshold to cope with the sparse condition of network. We ultimately perform detailed simulations to scrutinize the performance of our proposed scheme and its comparison with other two notable routing protocols in term of network lifetime and other essential parameters. The simulations results verify that our scheme performs better than the other techniques and near to optimal in the field of UWSN.Comment: 8th International Conference on Broadband and Wireless Computing, Communication and Applications (BWCCA'13), Compiegne, Franc

Wireless sensor networks with energy harvesting: Modeling and simulation based on a practical architecture using real radiation levels

This paper presents a new energy-harvesting model for a network simulator that implements super-capacitor energy storage with solar energy-harvesting recharge. The model is easily extensible, and other energyharvesting systems, or different energy storages, can be further developed. Moreover, code can be conveniently reused as the implementation is entirely uncoupled from the radio and node models. Real radiation data are obtained from available online databases in order to dynamically calculate super-capacitor charge and discharge. Such novelty enables the evaluation of energy evolution on a network of sensor nodes at various physical world locations and during different seasons. The model is validated against a real and fully working prototype, and good result correlation is shown. Furthermore, various experiments using the ns-3 simulator were conducted, demonstrating the utility of the model in assisting the research and development of the deployment of everlasting wireless sensor networks.This work was supported by the CICYT (research projects CTM2011-29691-C02-01 and TIN2011-28435-C03-01) and UPV research project SP20120889.Climent, S.; Sánchez Matías, AM.; Blanc Clavero, S.; Capella Hernández, JV.; Ors Carot, R. (2013). Wireless sensor networks with energy harvesting: Modeling and simulation based on a practical architecture using real radiation levels. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience. 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.3151S119Akyildiz, I. F., & Vuran, M. C. (2010). Wireless Sensor Networks. doi:10.1002/9780470515181Seah, W. K. G., Tan, Y. K., & Chan, A. T. S. (2012). Research in Energy Harvesting Wireless Sensor Networks and the Challenges Ahead. Autonomous Sensor Networks, 73-93. doi:10.1007/5346_2012_27Vullers, R., Schaijk, R., Visser, H., Penders, J., & Hoof, C. (2010). Energy Harvesting for Autonomous Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Solid-State Circuits Magazine, 2(2), 29-38. doi:10.1109/mssc.2010.936667Ammar, Y., Buhrig, A., Marzencki, M., Charlot, B., Basrour, S., Matou, K., & Renaudin, M. (2005). Wireless sensor network node with asynchronous architecture and vibration harvesting micro power generator. Proceedings of the 2005 joint conference on Smart objects and ambient intelligence innovative context-aware services: usages and technologies - sOc-EUSAI ’05. doi:10.1145/1107548.1107618Vijayaraghavan, K., & Rajamani, R. (2007). Active Control Based Energy Harvesting for Battery-Less Wireless Traffic Sensors. 2007 American Control Conference. doi:10.1109/acc.2007.4282842Bottner, H., Nurnus, J., Gavrikov, A., Kuhner, G., Jagle, M., Kunzel, C., … Schlereth, K.-H. (2004). New thermoelectric components using microsystem technologies. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, 13(3), 414-420. doi:10.1109/jmems.2004.828740Mateu L Codrea C Lucas N Pollak M Spies P Energy harvesting for wireless communication systems using thermogenerators Conference on Design of Circuits and Integrated Systems (DCIS) 2006AEMet Agencia Estatal de Meteorolgía 2013 http//www.aemet.esPANGAEA Data Publisher for Earth & Environmental Science 2013 http://www.pangaea.de/Zeng, K., Ren, K., Lou, W., & Moran, P. J. (2007). Energy aware efficient geographic routing in lossy wireless sensor networks with environmental energy supply. Wireless Networks, 15(1), 39-51. doi:10.1007/s11276-007-0022-0Hasenfratz, D., Meier, A., Moser, C., Chen, J.-J., & Thiele, L. (2010). Analysis, Comparison, and Optimization of Routing Protocols for Energy Harvesting Wireless Sensor Networks. 2010 IEEE International Conference on Sensor Networks, Ubiquitous, and Trustworthy Computing. doi:10.1109/sutc.2010.35Noh, D. K., & Hur, J. (2012). Using a dynamic backbone for efficient data delivery in solar-powered WSNs. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 35(4), 1277-1284. doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2012.01.012Lin, L., Shroff, N. B., & Srikant, R. (2007). Asymptotically Optimal Energy-Aware Routing for Multihop Wireless Networks With Renewable Energy Sources. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 15(5), 1021-1034. doi:10.1109/tnet.2007.896173Ferry, N., Ducloyer, S., Julien, N., & Jutel, D. (2011). Power/Energy Estimator for Designing WSN Nodes with Ambient Energy Harvesting Feature. EURASIP Journal on Embedded Systems, 2011(1), 242386. doi:10.1155/2011/242386Glaser, J., Weber, D., Madani, S., & Mahlknecht, S. (2008). Power Aware Simulation Framework for Wireless Sensor Networks and Nodes. EURASIP Journal on Embedded Systems, 2008(1), 369178. doi:10.1155/2008/369178De Mil, P., Jooris, B., Tytgat, L., Catteeuw, R., Moerman, I., Demeester, P., & Kamerman, A. (2010). Design and Implementation of a Generic Energy-Harvesting Framework Applied to the Evaluation of a Large-Scale Electronic Shelf-Labeling Wireless Sensor Network. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2010(1). doi:10.1155/2010/343690Castagnetti, A., Pegatoquet, A., Belleudy, C., & Auguin, M. (2012). A framework for modeling and simulating energy harvesting WSN nodes with efficient power management policies. EURASIP Journal on Embedded Systems, 2012(1). doi:10.1186/1687-3963-2012-8Alippi, C., & Galperti, C. (2008). An Adaptive System for Optimal Solar Energy Harvesting in Wireless Sensor Network Nodes. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, 55(6), 1742-1750. doi:10.1109/tcsi.2008.922023Xiaofan Jiang, Polastre, J., & Culler, D. (s. f.). Perpetual environmentally powered sensor networks. IPSN 2005. Fourth International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2005. doi:10.1109/ipsn.2005.1440974Simjee, F., & Chou, P. H. (2006). Everlast. Proceedings of the 2006 international symposium on Low power electronics and design - ISLPED ’06. doi:10.1145/1165573.1165619Sánchez, A., Climent, S., Blanc, S., Capella, J. V., & Piqueras, I. (2011). WSN with energy-harvesting. Proceedings of the 6th ACM workshop on Performance monitoring and measurement of heterogeneous wireless and wired networks - PM2HW2N ’11. doi:10.1145/2069087.2069091Renner C Jessen J Turau V Lifetime prediction for supercapacitor-powered wireless sensor nodes Proc. of the 8th GI/ITG KuVS Fachgesprächİ Drahtlose Sensornetze(FGSN09) 2009TI Analog, Embedded Processing, Semiconductor Company, Texas Instruments 2013 http//www.ti.comWSNVAL Wireless Sensor Networks Valencia 2013 www.wsnval.comSanchez, A., Blanc, S., Yuste, P., & Serrano, J. J. (2011). RFID Based Acoustic Wake-Up System for Underwater Sensor Networks. 2011 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Mobile Ad-Hoc and Sensor Systems. doi:10.1109/mass.2011.103Fan, K.-W., Zheng, Z., & Sinha, P. (2008). Steady and fair rate allocation for rechargeable sensors in perpetual sensor networks. Proceedings of the 6th ACM conference on Embedded network sensor systems - SenSys ’08. doi:10.1145/1460412.1460436Moser, C., Thiele, L., Brunelli, D., & Benini, L. (2010). Adaptive Power Management for Environmentally Powered Systems. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 59(4), 478-491. doi:10.1109/tc.2009.15

An Agent-Based Distributed Coordination Mechanism for Wireless Visual Sensor Nodes Using Dynamic Programming

The efficient management of the limited energy resources of a wireless visual sensor network is central to its successful operation. Within this context, this article focuses on the adaptive sampling, forwarding, and routing actions of each node in order to maximise the information value of the data collected. These actions are inter-related in a multi-hop routing scenario because each node’s energy consumption must be optimally allocated between sampling and transmitting its own data, receiving and forwarding the data of other nodes, and routing any data. Thus, we develop two optimal agent-based decentralised algorithms to solve this distributed constraint optimization problem. The first assumes that the route by which data is forwarded to the base station is fixed, and then calculates the optimal sampling, transmitting, and forwarding actions that each node should perform. The second assumes flexible routing, and makes optimal decisions regarding both the integration of actions that each node should choose, and also the route by which the data should be forwarded to the base station. The two algorithms represent a trade-off in optimality, communication cost, and processing time. In an empirical evaluation on sensor networks (whose underlying communication networks exhibit loops), we show that the algorithm with flexible routing is able to deliver approximately twice the quantity of information to the base station compared to the algorithm using fixed routing (where an arbitrary choice of route is made). However, this gain comes at a considerable communication and computational cost (increasing both by a factor of 100 times). Thus, while the algorithm with flexible routing is suitable for networks with a small numbers of nodes, it scales poorly, and as the size of the network increases, the algorithm with fixed routing is favoured

Supporting Cyber-Physical Systems with Wireless Sensor Networks: An Outlook of Software and Services

Sensing, communication, computation and control technologies are the essential building blocks of a cyber-physical system (CPS). Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) are a way to support CPS as they provide fine-grained spatial-temporal sensing, communication and computation at a low premium of cost and power. In this article, we explore the fundamental concepts guiding the design and implementation of WSNs. We report the latest developments in WSN software and services for meeting existing requirements and newer demands; particularly in the areas of: operating system, simulator and emulator, programming abstraction, virtualization, IP-based communication and security, time and location, and network monitoring and management. We also reflect on the ongoing efforts in providing dependable assurances for WSN-driven CPS. Finally, we report on its applicability with a case-study on smart buildings