109 research outputs found
Topos Semantics for Higher-Order Modal Logic
We define the notion of a model of higher-order modal logic in an arbitrary
elementary topos . In contrast to the well-known interpretation of
(non-modal) higher-order logic, the type of propositions is not interpreted by
the subobject classifier , but rather by a suitable
complete Heyting algebra . The canonical map relating and
both serves to interpret equality and provides a modal
operator on in the form of a comonad. Examples of such structures arise
from surjective geometric morphisms , where . The logic differs from non-modal higher-order
logic in that the principles of functional and propositional extensionality are
no longer valid but may be replaced by modalized versions. The usual Kripke,
neighborhood, and sheaf semantics for propositional and first-order modal logic
are subsumed by this notion
Categories for Dynamic Epistemic Logic
The primary goal of this paper is to recast the semantics of modal logic, and
dynamic epistemic logic (DEL) in particular, in category-theoretic terms. We
first review the category of relations and categories of Kripke frames, with
particular emphasis on the duality between relations and adjoint homomorphisms.
Using these categories, we then reformulate the semantics of DEL in a more
categorical and algebraic form. Several virtues of the new formulation will be
demonstrated: The DEL idea of updating a model into another is captured
naturally by the categorical perspective -- which emphasizes a family of
objects and structural relationships among them, as opposed to a single object
and structure on it. Also, the categorical semantics of DEL can be merged
straightforwardly with a standard categorical semantics for first-order logic,
providing a semantics for first-order DEL.Comment: In Proceedings TARK 2017, arXiv:1707.0825
A Galois connection between classical and intuitionistic logics. II: Semantics
Three classes of models of QHC, the joint logic of problems and propositions,
are constructed, including a class of subset/sheaf-valued models that is
related to solutions of some actual problems (such as solutions of algebraic
equations) and combines the familiar Leibniz-Euler-Venn semantics of classical
logic with a BHK-type semantics of intuitionistic logic.
To test the models, we consider a number of principles and rules, which
empirically appear to cover all "sufficiently simple" natural conjectures about
the behaviour of the operators ! and ?, and include two hypotheses put forward
by Hilbert and Kolmogorov, as formalized in the language of QHC. Each of these
turns out to be either derivable in QHC or equivalent to one of only 13
principles and 1 rule, of which 10 principles and 1 rule are conservative over
classical and intuitionistic logics. The three classes of models together
suffice to confirm the independence of these 10 principles and 1 rule, and to
determine the full lattice of implications between them, apart from one
potential implication.Comment: 35 pages. v4: Section 4.6 "Summary" is added at the end of the paper.
v3: Major revision of a half of v2. The results are improved and rewritten in
terms of the meta-logic. The other half of v2 (Euclid's Elements as a theory
over QHC) is expected to make part III after a revisio
Generalized Topological Semantics for First-Order Modal Logic
This dissertation provides a new semantics for first-order modal logic. It is philosophicallymotivated by the epistemic reading of modal operators and, in particular, three desiderata in the analysis of epistemic modalities.(i) The semantic modelling of epistemic modalities, in particular verifiability and falsifiability, cannot be properly achieved by Kripke's relational notion of accessibility. It requires instead a more general, topological notion of accessibility.(ii) Also, the epistemic reading of modal operators seems to require that we combine modal logic with fully classical first-order logic. For this purpose, however, Kripke's semantics for quantified modal logic is inadequate; its logic is free logic as opposed to classical logic.(iii) More importantly, Kripke's semantics comes with a restriction that is too strong to let us semantically express, for instance, that the identity of Hesperus and Phosphorus, even if metaphysically necessary, can still be a matter of epistemic discovery.To provide a semantics that accommodates the three desiderata, I show, on the one hand, howthe desideratum (i) can be achieved with topological semantics, and more generally neighborhood semantics, for propositional modal logic. On the other hand, to achieve (ii) and (iii), it turns out that David Lewis's counterpart theory is helpful at least technically. Even though Lewis's ownformulation is too liberal---in contrast to Kripke's being too restrictive---to achieve our goals, this dissertation provides a unification of the two frameworks, Kripke's and Lewis's. Through a series of both formal and conceptual comparisons of their ontologies and semantic ideas, it is shown that structures called sheaves are needed to unify the ideas and achieve the desiderata (ii) and (iii). In the end, I define a category of sheaves over a neighborhood frame with certain properties, and show that it provides a semantics that naturally unifies neighborhood semantics for propositional modal logic, on the one hand, and semantics for first-order logic on the other. Completeness theorems are proved
- …