Progression Modeling of Cognitive Disease Using Temporal Data Mining: Research Landscape, Gaps and Solution Design

Dementia is a cognitive disorder whose diagnosis and progression monitoring is very difficult due to a very slow onset and progression. It is difficult to detect whether cognitive decline is due to ageing process or due to some form of dementia as MRI scans of the brain cannot reliably differentiate between ageing related volume loss and pathological changes. Laboratory tests on blood or CSF samples have also not proved very useful. Alzheimer�s disease (AD) is recognized as the most common cause of dementia. Development of sensitive and reliable tool for evaluation in terms of early diagnosis and progression monitoring of AD is required. Since there is an absence of specific markers for predicting AD progression, there is a need to learn more about specific attributes and their temporal relationships that lead to this disease and determine progression from mild cognitive impairment to full blown AD. Various stages of disease and transitions from one stage to the have be modelled based on longitudinal patient data. This paper provides a critical review of the methods to understand disease progression modelling and determine factors leading to progression of AD from initial to final stages. Then the design of a machine learning based solution is proposed to handle the gaps in current research

Classification of skin hyper-pigmentation lesions with multi-spectral images

According to clinical protocols, skin diseases are quantified by dermatologists throughout a treatment period, and then a statistical test on these measures allows to evaluate a treatment efficacy. The first step of this process it to classify pathological interest areas. This task is challenging due to the high variability of the images in one clinical data set. In this report, we first review algorithms that exist in the literature and adapt them to our problem. Then we choose the more appropriate algorithm to design a classification strategy. Thereby, we propose to use data reduction combined with SVM to do a first classification of the disease. Then we associate the obtained classification map with a segmentation map in an "interactive classification tool" in order to compromise between operator dependency and algorithm robustness

Differentiation of Alzheimer's disease dementia, mild cognitive impairment and normal condition using PET-FDG and AV-45 imaging : a machine-learning approach

Nous avons utilisé l'imagerie TEP avec les traceurs F18-FDG et AV45 en conjonction avec les méthodes de classification du domaine du "Machine Learning". Les images ont été acquises en mode dynamique, une image toutes les 5 minutes. Les données ont été transformées par Analyse en Composantes Principales et Analyse en Composantes Indépendantes. Les images proviennent de trois sources différentes: la base de données ADNI (Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative) et deux protocoles réalisés au sein du centre TEP de l'hôpital Purpan. Pour évaluer la performance de la classification nous avons eu recours à la méthode de validation croisée LOOCV (Leave One Out Cross Validation). Nous donnons une comparaison entre les deux méthodes de classification les plus utilisées, SVM (Support Vector Machine) et les réseaux de neurones artificiels (ANN). La combinaison donnant le meilleur taux de classification semble être SVM et le traceur AV45. Cependant les confusions les plus importantes sont entre les patients MCI et les sujets normaux. Les patients Alzheimer se distinguent relativement mieux puisqu'ils sont retrouvés souvent à plus de 90%. Nous avons évalué la généralisation de telles méthodes de classification en réalisant l'apprentissage sur un ensemble de données et la classification sur un autre ensemble. Nous avons pu atteindre une spécificité de 100% et une sensibilité supérieure à 81%. La méthode SVM semble avoir une meilleure sensibilité que les réseaux de neurones. L'intérêt d'un tel travail est de pouvoir aider à terme au diagnostic de la maladie d'Alzheimer.We used PET imaging with tracers F18-FDG and AV45 in conjunction with the classification methods in the field of "Machine Learning". PET images were acquired in dynamic mode, an image every 5 minutes.The images used come from three different sources: the database ADNI (Alzheimer's Disease Neuro-Imaging Initiative, University of California Los Angeles) and two protocols performed in the PET center of the Purpan Hospital. The classification was applied after processing dynamic images by Principal Component Analysis and Independent Component Analysis. The data were separated into training set and test set. To evaluate the performance of the classification we used the method of cross-validation LOOCV (Leave One Out Cross Validation). We give a comparison between the two most widely used classification methods, SVM (Support Vector Machine) and artificial neural networks (ANN) for both tracers. The combination giving the best classification rate seems to be SVM and AV45 tracer. However the most important confusion is found between MCI patients and normal subjects. Alzheimer's patients differ somewhat better since they are often found in more than 90%. We evaluated the generalization of our methods by making learning from set of data and classification on another set . We reached the specifity score of 100% and sensitivity score of more than 81%. SVM method showed a bettrer sensitivity than Artificial Neural Network method. The value of such work is to help the clinicians in diagnosing Alzheimer's disease