23,606 research outputs found

    How to Solve the Price Puzzle? A Meta-Analysis

    Get PDF
    The short-run increase in prices following an unexpected tightening of monetary policy represents a frequently reported puzzle. Yet the puzzle is surprisingly easy to explain away when all published models are quantitatively reviewed. We collect about 1,000 point estimates of impulse responses from 70 articles using vector autoregressive models and present a simple method of research synthesis for graphical results. We find some evidence of publication selection against the price puzzle. Our results suggest that the reported impulse responses depend systematically on the study design: when misspecifications are filtered out, the average impulse response shows that prices decrease soon after a tightening. The long-run response of prices to monetary policy shocks depends on the characteristics of the economy.Meta-analysis, monetary policy transmission, price puzzle, publication selection bias.

    How to Solve the Price Puzzle? A Meta-Analysis

    Get PDF
    The short-run increase in prices following an unexpected tightening of monetary policy represents a frequently reported puzzle. Yet the puzzle is easy to explain away when all published models are quantitatively reviewed. We collect and examine about 1,000 point estimates of impulse responses from 70 articles using vector autoregressive models to study monetary transmission in various countries. We find some evidence of publication selection against the price puzzle in the literature, but our results also suggest that the reported puzzle is mostly caused by model misspecifications. Finally, the long-run response of prices to monetary policy shocks depends on the characteristics of the economy.Monetary policy transmission; Price puzzle; Meta-analysis; Publication selection bias

    Annulment proceedings and multilevel judicial conflict

    Get PDF
    This open access book provides an exhaustive picture of the role that annulment conflicts play in the EU multilevel system. Based on a rich dataset of annulment actions since the 1960s and a number of in-depth case studies, it explores the political dimension of annulment litigation, which has become an increasingly relevant judicial tool in the struggle over policy content and decision-making competences. The book covers the motivations of actors to turn policy conflicts into annulment actions, the emergence of multilevel actors’ litigant configurations, the impact of actors’ constellations on success in court, as well as the impact of annulment actions on the multilevel policy conflicts they originate from

    Which Foreigners Are Worth Wooing? A Meta-Analysis of Vertical Spillovers from FDI

    Get PDF
    The principal argument for subsidizing foreign investment is the assumed spillover of technology to local firms. Yet researchers report mixed results on spillovers. To examine the phenomenon in a systematic way, we collected 3,626 estimates from 57 empirical studies on between-sector spillovers and reviewed the literature quantitatively. Our results indicate that model misspecifications reduce the reported estimates, but that journals select relatively large estimates for publication. The underlying spillover to suppliers is positive and economically significant, whereas the spillover to buyers is insignificant. Greater spillovers are received by countries that have underdeveloped financial systems and that are open to international trade. Greater spillovers are generated by investors that come from distant countries and that have only slight technological advantages over local firms.Foreign direct investment, meta-analysis, productivity, publication selection bias, spillovers.

    Which Foreigners Are Worth Wooing? A Meta-Analysis of Vertical Spillovers from FDI

    Get PDF
    The principal argument for subsidizing foreign investment is the assumed spillover of technology to local firms. Yet researchers report mixed results on spillovers. To examine the phenomenon in a systematic way, we collected 3,626 estimates from 57 empirical studies on between-sector spillovers and reviewed the literature quantitatively. Our results indicate that model misspecifications reduce the reported estimates, but that journals select rela¬tively large estimates for publication. The underlying spillover to suppliers is positive and economically significant, whereas the spillover to buyers is insignificant. Greater spillovers are generated by investors that come from distant countries and that have only slight tech¬nological advantages over local firms. In addition, greater spillovers are received by countries that have underdeveloped financial systems and that are open to international trade.Foreign direct investment; Productivity; Spillovers; Meta-analysis; Publication selection bias

    Barriers of Financial Inclusion in Sub-Saharan Africa

    Get PDF
    This paper examines barriers to financial inclusion across sub-Sahara Africa (SSA) using the 2014 Global Findex dataset from the demand-side perspective. A two-level model is estimated with individual households nested in the country level variables. Lower levels of income are associated with lower levels of access to formal account. Similarly, literacy rates have significant effect on the level of account ownership.  Estimation results also reveals that as individuals grow old, they tend to switch from one form of account to the other.  Owning a debit card is more likely to increase account ownership.  Another important barrier to account ownership is proximity to the nearest financial services. These barriers have the potential to cause market failure and therefore the right policy interventions are required to stabilize the market. Keywords: Financial Inclusion, Multilevel Analysis, sub-Saharan Afric

    Which Foreigners are Worth Wooing? A Meta-Analysis of Vertical Spillovers from FDI

    Get PDF
    The principal argument for subsidizing foreign investment, especially in developing and transition economies, is the assumed spillover of technology to local firms. Yet researchers report mixed results on spillovers. To examine the phenomenon in a systematic way, we collected 3,626 estimates from 57 empirical studies on between-sector spillovers and reviewed the literature quantitatively. Our results indicate that model misspecifications reduce the reported estimates, but that journals select relatively large estimates for publication. The underlying spillover to suppliers is positive and economically significant, whereas the spillover to buyers is insignificant. Greater spillovers are generated by investors that come from distant countries and that have only slight technological advantages over local firms. In addition, greater spillovers are received by countries that have underdeveloped financial systems and that are open to international trade.Foreign direct investment; Productivity; Spillovers; Meta-analysis; Publication selection bias
    corecore