3,079 research outputs found
A Survey on Compiler Autotuning using Machine Learning
Since the mid-1990s, researchers have been trying to use machine-learning
based approaches to solve a number of different compiler optimization problems.
These techniques primarily enhance the quality of the obtained results and,
more importantly, make it feasible to tackle two main compiler optimization
problems: optimization selection (choosing which optimizations to apply) and
phase-ordering (choosing the order of applying optimizations). The compiler
optimization space continues to grow due to the advancement of applications,
increasing number of compiler optimizations, and new target architectures.
Generic optimization passes in compilers cannot fully leverage newly introduced
optimizations and, therefore, cannot keep up with the pace of increasing
options. This survey summarizes and classifies the recent advances in using
machine learning for the compiler optimization field, particularly on the two
major problems of (1) selecting the best optimizations and (2) the
phase-ordering of optimizations. The survey highlights the approaches taken so
far, the obtained results, the fine-grain classification among different
approaches and finally, the influential papers of the field.Comment: version 5.0 (updated on September 2018)- Preprint Version For our
Accepted Journal @ ACM CSUR 2018 (42 pages) - This survey will be updated
quarterly here (Send me your new published papers to be added in the
subsequent version) History: Received November 2016; Revised August 2017;
Revised February 2018; Accepted March 2018
Fine-Grain Iterative Compilation for WCET Estimation
Compiler optimizations, although reducing the execution times of programs, raise issues in static WCET estimation techniques and tools. Flow facts, such as loop bounds, may not be automatically found by static WCET analysis tools after aggressive code optimizations. In this paper, we explore the use of iterative compilation (WCET-directed program optimization to explore the optimization space), with the objective to (i) allow flow facts to be automatically found and (ii) select optimizations that result in the lowest WCET estimates. We also explore to which extent code outlining helps, by allowing the selection of different optimization options for different code snippets of the application
Lost in translation: Exposing hidden compiler optimization opportunities
Existing iterative compilation and machine-learning-based optimization
techniques have been proven very successful in achieving better optimizations
than the standard optimization levels of a compiler. However, they were not
engineered to support the tuning of a compiler's optimizer as part of the
compiler's daily development cycle. In this paper, we first establish the
required properties which a technique must exhibit to enable such tuning. We
then introduce an enhancement to the classic nightly routine testing of
compilers which exhibits all the required properties, and thus, is capable of
driving the improvement and tuning of the compiler's common optimizer. This is
achieved by leveraging resource usage and compilation information collected
while systematically exploiting prefixes of the transformations applied at
standard optimization levels. Experimental evaluation using the LLVM v6.0.1
compiler demonstrated that the new approach was able to reveal hidden
cross-architecture and architecture-dependent potential optimizations on two
popular processors: the Intel i5-6300U and the Arm Cortex-A53-based Broadcom
BCM2837 used in the Raspberry Pi 3B+. As a case study, we demonstrate how the
insights from our approach enabled us to identify and remove a significant
shortcoming of the CFG simplification pass of the LLVM v6.0.1 compiler.Comment: 31 pages, 7 figures, 2 table. arXiv admin note: text overlap with
arXiv:1802.0984
- …