A Benes Based NoC Switching Architecture for Mixed Criticality Embedded Systems

Multi-core, Mixed Criticality Embedded (MCE) real-time systems require high timing precision and predictability to guarantee there will be no interference between tasks. These guarantees are necessary in application areas such as avionics and automotive, where task interference or missed deadlines could be catastrophic, and safety requirements are strict. In modern multi-core systems, the interconnect becomes a potential point of uncertainty, introducing major challenges in proving behaviour is always within specified constraints, limiting the means of growing system performance to add more tasks, or provide more computational resources to existing tasks. We present MCENoC, a Network-on-Chip (NoC) switching architecture that provides innovations to overcome this with predictable, formally verifiable timing behaviour that is consistent across the whole NoC. We show how the fundamental properties of Benes networks benefit MCE applications and meet our architecture requirements. Using SystemVerilog Assertions (SVA), formal properties are defined that aid the refinement of the specification of the design as well as enabling the implementation to be exhaustively formally verified. We demonstrate the performance of the design in terms of size, throughput and predictability, and discuss the application level considerations needed to exploit this architecture

A Benes̆ Based NoC Switching Architecture for Mixed Criticality Embedded Systems

Multi-core, Mixed Criticality Embedded (MCE) real-time systems require high timing precision and predictability to guarantee there will be no interference between tasks. These guarantees are necessary in application areas such as avionics and automotive, where task interference or missed deadlines could be catastrophic, and safety requirements are strict. In modern multi-core systems, the interconnect becomes a potential point of uncertainty, introducing major challenges in proving behaviour is always within specified constraints, limiting the means of growing system performance to add more tasks, or provide more computational resources to existing tasks. We present MCENoC, a Network-on-Chip (NoC) switching architecture that provides innovations to overcome this with predictable, formally verifiable timing behaviour that is consistent across the whole NoC. We show how the fundamental properties of Benes networks benefit MCE applications and meet our architecture requirements. Using SystemVerilog Assertions (SVA), formal properties are defined that aid the refinement of the specification of the design as well as enabling the implementation to be exhaustively formally verified. We demonstrate the performance of the design in terms of size, throughput and predictability, and discuss the application level considerations needed to exploit this architecture

On the Reuse of RTL assertions in Systemc TLM Verification

Reuse of existing and already verified intellectual property (IP) models is a key strategy to cope with the com- plexity of designing modern system-on-chips (SoC)s under ever stringent time-to-market requirements. In particular, the recent trend towards system-level design and transaction level modeling (TLM) gives rise to new challenges for reusing existing RTL IPs and their verification environment in TLM-based design flows. While techniques and tools to abstract RTL IPs into TLM models have begun to appear, the problem of reusing, at TLM, a verification environment originally developed for an RTL IP is still underexplored, particularly when assertion-based verification (ABV) is adopted. Some techniques and frameworks have been proposed to deal with ABV at TLM, but they assume a top-down design and verification flow, where assertions are defined ex-novo at TLM level. In contrast, the reuse of existing assertions in an RTL-to-TLM bottom-up design flow has not been analyzed yet. This paper proposes a methodology to reuse assertions originally defined for a given RTL IP, to verify the corresponding TLM model. Experimental results have been conducted on benchmarks of different characteristics and complexity to show the applicability and the efficacy of the proposed methodology

Reusing RTL assertion checkers for verification of SystemC TLM models

The recent trend towards system-level design gives rise to new challenges for reusing existing RTL intellectual properties (IPs) and their verification environment in TLM. While techniques and tools to abstract RTL IPs into TLM models have begun to appear, the problem of reusing, at TLM, a verification environment originally developed for an RTL IP is still under-explored, particularly when ABV is adopted. Some frameworks have been proposed to deal with ABV at TLM, but they assume a top-down design and verification flow, where assertions are defined ex-novo at TLM level. In contrast, the reuse of existing assertions in an RTL-to-TLM bottom-up design flow has not been analyzed yet, except by using transactors to create a mixed simulation between the TLM design and the RTL checkers corresponding to the assertions. However, the use of transactors may lead to longer verification time due to the need of developing and verifying the transactors themselves. Moreover, the simulation time is negatively affected by the presence of transactors, which slow down the simulation at the speed of the slowest parts (i.e., RTL checkers). This article proposes an alternative methodology that does not require transactors for reusing assertions, originally defined for a given RTL IP, in order to verify the corresponding TLM model. Experimental results have been conducted on benchmarks with different characteristics and complexity to show the applicability and the efficacy of the proposed methodology

Hardware/Software Co-verification Using Path-based Symbolic Execution

Conventional tools for formal hardware/software co-verification use bounded model checking techniques to construct a single monolithic propositional formula. Formulas generated in this way are extremely complex and contain a great deal of irrelevant logic, hence are difficult to solve even by the state-of-the-art Satisfiability (SAT) solvers. In a typical hardware/software co-design the firmware only exercises a fraction of the hardware state-space, and we can use this observation to generate simpler and more concise formulas. In this paper, we present a novel verification algorithm for hardware/software co-designs that identify partitions of the firmware and the hardware logic pertaining to the feasible execution paths by means of path-based symbolic simulation with custom path-pruning, propertyguided slicing and incremental SAT solving. We have implemented this approach in our tool COVERIF. We have experimentally compared COVERIF with HW-CBMC, a monolithic BMC based co-verification tool, and observed an average speed-up of 5× over HW-CBMC for proving safety properties as well as detecting critical co-design bugs in an open-source Universal Asynchronous Receiver Transmitter design and a large SoC design

LLM for SoC Security: A Paradigm Shift

As the ubiquity and complexity of system-on-chip (SoC) designs increase across electronic devices, the task of incorporating security into an SoC design flow poses significant challenges. Existing security solutions are inadequate to provide effective verification of modern SoC designs due to their limitations in scalability, comprehensiveness, and adaptability. On the other hand, Large Language Models (LLMs) are celebrated for their remarkable success in natural language understanding, advanced reasoning, and program synthesis tasks. Recognizing an opportunity, our research delves into leveraging the emergent capabilities of Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPTs) to address the existing gaps in SoC security, aiming for a more efficient, scalable, and adaptable methodology. By integrating LLMs into the SoC security verification paradigm, we open a new frontier of possibilities and challenges to ensure the security of increasingly complex SoCs. This paper offers an in-depth analysis of existing works, showcases practical case studies, demonstrates comprehensive experiments, and provides useful promoting guidelines. We also present the achievements, prospects, and challenges of employing LLM in different SoC security verification tasks.Comment: 42 page

Master of Science

thesisThis thesis designs, implements, and evaluates modular Open Core Protocol (OCP) interfaces for Intellectual Property (IP) cores and Network-on-Chip (NoC) that re- duces System-On-Chip (SoC) design time and enables research on di erent architectural sequencing control methods. To utilize the NoCs design time optimization feature at the boundaries, a standardized industry socket was required, which can address the SoC shorter time-to-market requirements, design issues, and also the subsequent reuse of developed IP cores. OCP is an open industry standard socket interface speci cation used in this research to enable the IP cores reusability across multiple SoC designs. This research work designs and implements clocked OCP interfaces between IP cores and On-Chip Network Fabric (NoC), in single- and multi- frequency clocked domains. The NoC interfaces between IP cores and on-chip network fabric are implemented using the standard network interface structure. It consists of back-end and front-end submodules corresponding to customized interfaces to IP cores or network fabric and OCP Master and Slave entities, respectively. A generic domain interface (DI) protocol is designed which acts as the bridge between back-end and front-end submodules for synchronization and data ow control. Clocked OCP interfaces are synthesized, placed and routed using IBM's 65nm process technology. The implemented designs are veri ed for OCP compliance using SOLV (Sonics OCP Library for Veri cation). Finally, this thesis reports the performance metrics such as design target frequency of operation, latency, area, energy per transaction, and maximum bandwidth across network on-chip for single- and multifrequency clocked designs

Guarded atomic actions and refinement in a system-on-chip development flow: bridging the specification gap with Event-B

Modern System-on-chip (SoC) hardware design puts considerable pressure on existing design and verification flows, languages and tools. The Register Transfer Level (RTL)description, which forms the input for synchronous, logic synthesis-driven design is at too low a level of abstraction for efficient architectural exploration and re-use. The existing methods for taking a high-level paper specification and refining this specification to an implementation that meets its performance criteria is largely manual and error-prone and as RTL descriptions get larger, a systematic design method is necessary to address explicitly the timing issues that arise when applying logic synthesis to such large blocks.Guarded Atomic Actions have been shown to offer a convenient notation for describing microarchitectures that is amenable to formal reasoning and high-level synthesis. Event-B is a language and method that supports the development of specifications with automatic proof and refinement, based on guarded atomic actions. Latency-insensitive design ensures that a design composed of functionally correct components will be independent of communication latency. A method has been developed which uses Event-B for latency-insensitive SoC component and sub-system design which can be combined with high-level, component synthesis to enable architectural exploration and re-use at the specification level and to close the specification gap in the SoC hardware flow