13,464 research outputs found

    General bounds on limited broadcast domination

    Get PDF
    Limited dominating broadcasts were proposed as a variant of dominating broadcasts, where the broadcast function is upper bounded by a constant k . The minimum cost of such a dominating broadcast is the k -broadcast dominating number. We present a uni ed upper bound on this parameter for any value of k in terms of both k and the order of the graph. For the speci c case of the 2-broadcast dominating number, we show that this bound is tight for graphs as large as desired. We also study the family of caterpillars, providing a smaller upper bound, which is attained by a set of such graphs with unbounded order.Preprin

    On the multipacking number of grid graphs

    Full text link
    In 2001, Erwin introduced broadcast domination in graphs. It is a variant of classical domination where selected vertices may have different domination powers. The minimum cost of a dominating broadcast in a graph GG is denoted γb(G)\gamma_b(G). The dual of this problem is called multipacking: a multipacking is a set MM of vertices such that for any vertex vv and any positive integer rr, the ball of radius rr around vv contains at most rr vertices of MM . The maximum size of a multipacking in a graph GG is denoted mp(G). Naturally mp(G) γb(G)\leq \gamma_b(G). Earlier results by Farber and by Lubiw show that broadcast and multipacking numbers are equal for strongly chordal graphs. In this paper, we show that all large grids (height at least 4 and width at least 7), which are far from being chordal, have their broadcast and multipacking numbers equal

    Distributed Connectivity Decomposition

    Full text link
    We present time-efficient distributed algorithms for decomposing graphs with large edge or vertex connectivity into multiple spanning or dominating trees, respectively. As their primary applications, these decompositions allow us to achieve information flow with size close to the connectivity by parallelizing it along the trees. More specifically, our distributed decomposition algorithms are as follows: (I) A decomposition of each undirected graph with vertex-connectivity kk into (fractionally) vertex-disjoint weighted dominating trees with total weight Ω(klogn)\Omega(\frac{k}{\log n}), in O~(D+n)\widetilde{O}(D+\sqrt{n}) rounds. (II) A decomposition of each undirected graph with edge-connectivity λ\lambda into (fractionally) edge-disjoint weighted spanning trees with total weight λ12(1ε)\lceil\frac{\lambda-1}{2}\rceil(1-\varepsilon), in O~(D+nλ)\widetilde{O}(D+\sqrt{n\lambda}) rounds. We also show round complexity lower bounds of Ω~(D+nk)\tilde{\Omega}(D+\sqrt{\frac{n}{k}}) and Ω~(D+nλ)\tilde{\Omega}(D+\sqrt{\frac{n}{\lambda}}) for the above two decompositions, using techniques of [Das Sarma et al., STOC'11]. Moreover, our vertex-connectivity decomposition extends to centralized algorithms and improves the time complexity of [Censor-Hillel et al., SODA'14] from O(n3)O(n^3) to near-optimal O~(m)\tilde{O}(m). As corollaries, we also get distributed oblivious routing broadcast with O(1)O(1)-competitive edge-congestion and O(logn)O(\log n)-competitive vertex-congestion. Furthermore, the vertex connectivity decomposition leads to near-time-optimal O(logn)O(\log n)-approximation of vertex connectivity: centralized O~(m)\widetilde{O}(m) and distributed O~(D+n)\tilde{O}(D+\sqrt{n}). The former moves toward the 1974 conjecture of Aho, Hopcroft, and Ullman postulating an O(m)O(m) centralized exact algorithm while the latter is the first distributed vertex connectivity approximation

    Broadcasts on Paths and Cycles

    Get PDF
    A broadcast on a graph G=(V,E)G=(V,E) is a function f:V{0,,diam(G)}f: V\longrightarrow \{0,\ldots,\operatorname{diam}(G)\} such that f(v)eG(v)f(v)\leq e_G(v) for every vertex vVv\in V, wherediam(G)\operatorname{diam}(G) denotes the diameter of GG and eG(v)e_G(v) the eccentricity of vv in GG. The cost of such a broadcast is then the value vVf(v)\sum_{v\in V}f(v).Various types of broadcast functions on graphs have been considered in the literature, in relation with domination, irredundence, independenceor packing, leading to the introduction of several broadcast numbers on graphs.In this paper, we determine these broadcast numbers for all paths and cycles, thus answering a questionraised in [D.~Ahmadi, G.H.~Fricke, C.~Schroeder, S.T.~Hedetniemi and R.C.~Laskar, Broadcast irredundance in graphs. {\it Congr. Numer.} 224 (2015), 17--31]

    The Total Acquisition Number of Random Graphs

    Full text link
    Let GG be a graph in which each vertex initially has weight 1. In each step, the weight from a vertex uu can be moved to a neighbouring vertex vv, provided that the weight on vv is at least as large as the weight on uu. The total acquisition number of GG, denoted by at(G)a_t(G), is the minimum possible size of the set of vertices with positive weight at the end of the process. LeSaulnier, Prince, Wenger, West, and Worah asked for the minimum value of p=p(n)p=p(n) such that at(G(n,p))=1a_t(\mathcal{G}(n,p)) = 1 with high probability, where G(n,p)\mathcal{G}(n,p) is a binomial random graph. We show that p=log2nn1.4427 lognnp = \frac{\log_2 n}{n} \approx 1.4427 \ \frac{\log n}{n} is a sharp threshold for this property. We also show that almost all trees TT satisfy at(T)=Θ(n)a_t(T) = \Theta(n), confirming a conjecture of West.Comment: 18 pages, 1 figur
    corecore