193 research outputs found
Towards modular compilers for effects
Compilers are traditionally factorised into a number of separate phases, such as parsing, type checking, code generation, etc. However, there is another potential factorisation that has received comparatively little attention: the treatment of separate language features, such as mutable state, input/output, exceptions, concurrency and so forth. In this article we focus on the problem of modular compilation, in which the aim is to develop compilers for separate language features independently, which can then be combined as required. We summarise our progress to date, issues that have arisen, and further wor
Modular interpreters with implicit context propagation
Modular interpreters are a crucial first step towards component-based language development: instead of writing language interpreters from scratch, they can be assembled from reusable, semantic building blocks. Unfortunately, traditional language interpreters can be hard to extend because different language constructs may require different interpreter signatures. For instance, arithmetic interpreters produce a value without any context information, whereas binding constructs require an additional environment.In this paper, we present a practical solution to this problem based on implicit context propagation. By structuring denotational-style interpreters as Object Algebras, base interpreters can be retroactively lifted into new interpreters that have an extended signature. The additional parameters are implicitly propagated behind the scenes, through the evaluation of the base interpreter.Interpreter lifting enables a flexible style of modular and extensible language development. The technique works in mainstream object-oriented languages, does not sacrifice type safety or separate compilation, and can be easily automated, for instance using macros in Scala or dynamic proxies in Java. We illustrate implicit context propagation using a modular definition of Featherweight Java and its extension to support side-effects, and an extensible domain-specific language for state machines. We finally investigate the performance overhead of lifting by running the DeltaBlue benchmark program in Javascript on top of a modular implementation of LambdaJS and a dedicated micro-benchmark. The results show that lifting makes interpreters roughly twice as slow because of additional call overhead. Further research is needed to eliminate this performance penalty
Introducing a Calculus of Effects and Handlers for Natural Language Semantics
In compositional model-theoretic semantics, researchers assemble
truth-conditions or other kinds of denotations using the lambda calculus. It
was previously observed that the lambda terms and/or the denotations studied
tend to follow the same pattern: they are instances of a monad. In this paper,
we present an extension of the simply-typed lambda calculus that exploits this
uniformity using the recently discovered technique of effect handlers. We prove
that our calculus exhibits some of the key formal properties of the lambda
calculus and we use it to construct a modular semantics for a small fragment
that involves multiple distinct semantic phenomena
Effects and Effect Handlers for Programmable Inference
Inference algorithms for probabilistic programming are complex imperative
programs with many moving parts. Efficient inference often requires customising
an algorithm to a particular probabilistic model or problem, sometimes called
inference programming. Most inference frameworks are implemented in languages
that lack a disciplined approach to side effects, which can result in
monolithic implementations where the structure of the algorithms is obscured
and inference programming is hard. Functional programming with typed effects
offers a more structured and modular foundation for programmable inference,
with monad transformers being the primary structuring mechanism explored to
date.
This paper presents an alternative approach to programmable inference, based
on algebraic effects, building on recent work that used algebraic effects to
represent probabilistic models. Using effect signatures to specify the key
operations of the algorithms, and effect handlers to modularly interpret those
operations for specific variants, we develop three abstract algorithms, or
inference patterns, representing three important classes of inference:
Metropolis-Hastings, particle filtering, and guided optimisation. We show how
our approach reveals the algorithms' high-level structure, and makes it easy to
tailor and recombine their parts into new variants. We implement the three
inference patterns as a Haskell library, and discuss the pros and cons of
algebraic effects vis-a-vis monad transformers as a structuring mechanism for
modular imperative algorithm design. It should be possible to reimplement our
library in any typed functional language able to emulate effects and effect
handlers
Interaction Trees: Representing Recursive and Impure Programs in Coq
"Interaction trees" (ITrees) are a general-purpose data structure for
representing the behaviors of recursive programs that interact with their
environments. A coinductive variant of "free monads," ITrees are built out of
uninterpreted events and their continuations. They support compositional
construction of interpreters from "event handlers", which give meaning to
events by defining their semantics as monadic actions. ITrees are expressive
enough to represent impure and potentially nonterminating, mutually recursive
computations, while admitting a rich equational theory of equivalence up to
weak bisimulation. In contrast to other approaches such as relationally
specified operational semantics, ITrees are executable via code extraction,
making them suitable for debugging, testing, and implementing software
artifacts that are amenable to formal verification.
We have implemented ITrees and their associated theory as a Coq library,
mechanizing classic domain- and category-theoretic results about program
semantics, iteration, monadic structures, and equational reasoning. Although
the internals of the library rely heavily on coinductive proofs, the interface
hides these details so that clients can use and reason about ITrees without
explicit use of Coq's coinduction tactics.
To showcase the utility of our theory, we prove the termination-sensitive
correctness of a compiler from a simple imperative source language to an
assembly-like target whose meanings are given in an ITree-based denotational
semantics. Unlike previous results using operational techniques, our
bisimulation proof follows straightforwardly by structural induction and
elementary rewriting via an equational theory of combinators for control-flow
graphs.Comment: 28 pages, 4 pages references, published at POPL 202
Layer by layer - Combining Monads
We develop a method to incrementally construct programming languages. Our
approach is categorical: each layer of the language is described as a monad.
Our method either (i) concretely builds a distributive law between two monads,
i.e. layers of the language, which then provides a monad structure to the
composition of layers, or (ii) identifies precisely the algebraic obstacles to
the existence of a distributive law and gives a best approximant language. The
running example will involve three layers: a basic imperative language enriched
first by adding non-determinism and then probabilistic choice. The first
extension works seamlessly, but the second encounters an obstacle, which
results in a best approximant language structurally very similar to the
probabilistic network specification language ProbNetKAT
- …