38,309 research outputs found
The First-Order Theory of Sets with Cardinality Constraints is Decidable
We show that the decidability of the first-order theory of the language that
combines Boolean algebras of sets of uninterpreted elements with Presburger
arithmetic operations. We thereby disprove a recent conjecture that this theory
is undecidable. Our language allows relating the cardinalities of sets to the
values of integer variables, and can distinguish finite and infinite sets. We
use quantifier elimination to show the decidability and obtain an elementary
upper bound on the complexity.
Precise program analyses can use our decidability result to verify
representation invariants of data structures that use an integer field to
represent the number of stored elements.Comment: 18 page
VC-dimension of short Presburger formulas
We study VC-dimension of short formulas in Presburger Arithmetic, defined to
have a bounded number of variables, quantifiers and atoms. We give both lower
and upper bounds, which are tight up to a polynomial factor in the bit length
of the formula
Computing Least Fixed Points of Probabilistic Systems of Polynomials
We study systems of equations of the form X1 = f1(X1, ..., Xn), ..., Xn =
fn(X1, ..., Xn), where each fi is a polynomial with nonnegative coefficients
that add up to 1. The least nonnegative solution, say mu, of such equation
systems is central to problems from various areas, like physics, biology,
computational linguistics and probabilistic program verification. We give a
simple and strongly polynomial algorithm to decide whether mu=(1, ..., 1)
holds. Furthermore, we present an algorithm that computes reliable sequences of
lower and upper bounds on mu, converging linearly to mu. Our algorithm has
these features despite using inexact arithmetic for efficiency. We report on
experiments that show the performance of our algorithms.Comment: Published in the Proceedings of the 27th International Symposium on
Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS). Technical Report is also
available via arxiv.or
Arithmetic Circuit Lower Bounds via MaxRank
We introduce the polynomial coefficient matrix and identify maximum rank of
this matrix under variable substitution as a complexity measure for
multivariate polynomials. We use our techniques to prove super-polynomial lower
bounds against several classes of non-multilinear arithmetic circuits. In
particular, we obtain the following results :
As our main result, we prove that any homogeneous depth-3 circuit for
computing the product of matrices of dimension requires
size. This improves the lower bounds by Nisan and
Wigderson(1995) when .
There is an explicit polynomial on variables and degree at most
for which any depth-3 circuit of product dimension at most
(dimension of the space of affine forms feeding into each
product gate) requires size . This generalizes the lower bounds
against diagonal circuits proved by Saxena(2007). Diagonal circuits are of
product dimension 1.
We prove a lower bound on the size of product-sparse
formulas. By definition, any multilinear formula is a product-sparse formula.
Thus, our result extends the known super-polynomial lower bounds on the size of
multilinear formulas by Raz(2006).
We prove a lower bound on the size of partitioned arithmetic
branching programs. This result extends the known exponential lower bound on
the size of ordered arithmetic branching programs given by Jansen(2008).Comment: 22 page
Certified Roundoff Error Bounds using Bernstein Expansions and Sparse Krivine-Stengle Representations
Floating point error is an inevitable drawback of embedded systems
implementation. Computing rigorous upper bounds of roundoff errors is
absolutely necessary to the validation of critical software. This problem is
even more challenging when addressing non-linear programs. In this paper, we
propose and compare two new methods based on Bernstein expansions and sparse
Krivine-Stengle representations, adapted from the field of the global
optimization to compute upper bounds of roundoff errors for programs
implementing polynomial functions. We release two related software package
FPBern and FPKiSten, and compare them with state of the art tools. We show that
these two methods achieve competitive performance, while computing accurate
upper bounds by comparison with other tools.Comment: 20 pages, 2 table
An Instantiation-Based Approach for Solving Quantified Linear Arithmetic
This paper presents a framework to derive instantiation-based decision
procedures for satisfiability of quantified formulas in first-order theories,
including its correctness, implementation, and evaluation. Using this framework
we derive decision procedures for linear real arithmetic (LRA) and linear
integer arithmetic (LIA) formulas with one quantifier alternation. Our
procedure can be integrated into the solving architecture used by typical SMT
solvers. Experimental results on standardized benchmarks from model checking,
static analysis, and synthesis show that our implementation of the procedure in
the SMT solver CVC4 outperforms existing tools for quantified linear
arithmetic
Consistency of circuit lower bounds with bounded theories
Proving that there are problems in that require
boolean circuits of super-linear size is a major frontier in complexity theory.
While such lower bounds are known for larger complexity classes, existing
results only show that the corresponding problems are hard on infinitely many
input lengths. For instance, proving almost-everywhere circuit lower bounds is
open even for problems in . Giving the notorious difficulty of
proving lower bounds that hold for all large input lengths, we ask the
following question: Can we show that a large set of techniques cannot prove
that is easy infinitely often? Motivated by this and related
questions about the interaction between mathematical proofs and computations,
we investigate circuit complexity from the perspective of logic.
Among other results, we prove that for any parameter it is
consistent with theory that computational class , where is one of
the pairs: and , and , and
. In other words, these theories cannot establish
infinitely often circuit upper bounds for the corresponding problems. This is
of interest because the weaker theory already formalizes
sophisticated arguments, such as a proof of the PCP Theorem. These consistency
statements are unconditional and improve on earlier theorems of [KO17] and
[BM18] on the consistency of lower bounds with
- âŠ