On the Determinism of Multi-core Processors

Hard real time systems are evolving in order to respond to the increasing demand in complex functionalities while taking advantage of newer hardware. Software development for safety critical systems has to comply with strict requirements that will facilitate the certification process. During this process, each part of the system is evaluated, requiring a certain level of assurance in order to provide confidence in the product. In particular there must be a level of confidence that the system behaves deterministically that may be based on functionality, resources and time. The success of system verification depends greatly on the capacity to determine its exact behavior. Nonetheless, hardware evolved in order to maximize the average computation power throughput with little to no regard to the deterministic aspect. Therefore modern architectural features of processors, like pipelines, cache memories and co-processors, make it hard to verify that all the needed properties are respected. The multi-core is furthermore difficult to analyze as the architecture employs mechanisms that compromise strong spatial and temporal partitioning when using shared resources without rigorous access control like shared caches or shared input/outputs. In this paper we identify and analyze the main sources of nondeterminism of the multi-cores with regard to the timing estimation. Precise determination of the worst case execution time is a challenging task even in single-core architectures. The problems are accentuated in the multi-core context mainly due to the resource sharing that can lead to highly complex interactions or to nondeterminism. Most of the units that generate behaviors that are hard to take into account can be deactivated, but it is not always easy to predict the impact on the performance. Nevertheless some of the features cannot be disabled (such as the out of order execution or some nondeterministic crossbar access policies) which leads to the invalidation of the respective platform for applications with high criticality level. We will address the problematic units, propose configuration or architecture guidelines and estimate their impact on the performance and determinism of the system

211004

Today multicore processors are used in most modern systems that require computational logic. However, their applicability in systems with stringent timing requirements is still an ongoing research. This is due to the difficulty of ensuring the timing correctness of tasks executing on a multicore platform that comprises a number of shared hardware resources, e.g., caches, memory bus and the main memory. Concurrent accesses to any of these shared resources can generate uncontrolled interference, which complicates the estimations of tasks' worst-case execution time (WCET) and the worst-case response time (WCRT). The use of the 3-phase task execution model helps in upper bounding the contention due to the sharing of bus/main memory in multicore systems. It divides the execution of tasks into distinct memory and execution phases, where tasks can only access the bus/main memory during their memory phases. This makes bus/memory access patterns of tasks more predictable, enabling a preciser computation of bus/memory contention. In this work, we show how the bus contention can be computed for the 3-phase task model considering a work-conserving, i.e., round-robin (RR) based, arbitration policy at the memory bus. This is different from existing works that analyze the time-division multiple access (TDMA) and first-come-first-serve (FCFS) based bus arbitration policies. First, we present a solution to model the bus contention that can be suffered/caused by tasks executing on the same/remote cores of a multicore system under an RR-based bus arbitration scheme. We then evaluate the impact of resulting bus contention on taskset schedulability. Experimental results show that our proposed RR-based bus contention analysis can improve taskset schedulability by up to 100 percentage points than the TDMA-based analysis and up to 40 percentage points than the FCFS-based bus contention analysis.This work was partially supported by National Funds through FCT/MCTES (Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology), within the CISTER Research Unit (UIDB-UIDP/04234/2020); also by the Operational Competitiveness Programme and Internationalization (COMPETE 2020) under the PT2020 Partnership Agreement, through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), and by national funds through the FCT, within project POCI-01-0145-FEDER-029119 (PREFECT); also by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 - The EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation 2014-2020, under grant agreement No. 732505. Project “TEC4Growth - Pervasive Intelligence, Enhancers and Proofs of Concept with Industrial Impact/NORTE-01-0145-FEDER000020” financed by the North Portugal Regional Operational Programme (NORTE 2020), under the PORTUGAL 2020 Partnership Agreement; also by FCT, under PhD grant 2020.09532.BD.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

220801

Multicore platforms are being increasingly adopted in Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) due to their advantages over single-core processors, such as raw computing power and energy efficiency. Typically, multicore platforms use a shared memory bus that connects the cores to the off-chip main memory. This sharing of memory bus may cause tasks running on different cores to compete for access to the main memory whenever data/instructions are need to be read/written from/to the main memory. Such competition is problematic, as it may cause variations in the execution time of tasks in a non-deterministic way. To reduce the complexity of analysing this problem, the 3-phase task model was proposed that divides tasks' executions into distinct memory and execution phases. The distinctive memory phases are then scheduled to eliminate/minimize main memory contention between concurrently executing tasks. However, 3-phase tasks running on different cores may still compete to access the shared memory bus/main memory in order to execute memory phases. This paper presents a partitioned scheduling-based approach that allows one to derive memory bus contention-aware worst-case response time of tasks that follow the 3-phase task model. In particular, the bus-contention analysis is derived by considering two memory access models, i.e., (i) dedicated memory access model, where a core having allowed to access the main memory via memory bus is permitted to execute more than one memory phase, and (ii) fair memory access model, that restrict each core to execute only one memory phase in its allocated bus access. Both these models represent different system and application requirements, and the resulting bus contention of tasks may vary depending on the considered model. To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed bus contention analysis, we compare its performance against an existing analysis in the state-of-the-art by performing (i) case-study experiments, using benchmarks from the Mälardalen Benchmark suite, and (ii) empirical evaluation using synthetic task sets. Results show that our proposed analysis can improve task set schedulability of 3-phase tasks by up to 88 percentage points.This work was partially supported by European Union’s Horizon 2020 -The EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation 2014-2020, under grant agreement No. 732505. Project “TEC4Growth - Pervasive Intelligence, Enhancers and Proofs of Concept with Industrial Impact/NORTE-01-0145-FEDER000020” 845 financed by the North Portugal Regional Operational Programme (NORTE 2020), under the PORTUGAL 2020 Partnership Agreement; also by National Funds through FCT/MCTES (Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology), within the CISTER Research Unit (UIDP/UIDB/04234/2020); by FCT and the Portuguese National Innovation Agency (ANI), under the CMU Portugal partnership, through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) of the Operational Competitiveness Programme and Internationaliza850 tion (COMPETE 2020), under the PT2020 Partnership Agreement, within project FLOYD (POCI-01-0247- FEDER-045912), also by FCT under PhD grant 2020.09532.BD.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

Modeling shared cache and bus in multi-cores for timing analysis

10.1145/1811212.1811220Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Software and Compilers for Embedded Systems, SCOPES 201

Design and implementation of WCET analyses : including a case study on multi-core processors with shared buses

For safety-critical real-time embedded systems, the worst-case execution time (WCET) analysis — determining an upper bound on the possible execution times of a program — is an important part of the system verification. Multi-core processors share resources (e.g. buses and caches) between multiple processor cores and, thus, complicate the WCET analysis as the execution times of a program executed on one processor core significantly depend on the programs executed in parallel on the concurrent cores. We refer to this phenomenon as shared-resource interference. This thesis proposes a novel way of modeling shared-resource interference during WCET analysis. It enables an efficient analysis — as it only considers one processor core at a time — and it is sound for hardware platforms exhibiting timing anomalies. Moreover, this thesis demonstrates how to realize a timing-compositional verification on top of the proposed modeling scheme. In this way, this thesis closes the gap between modern hardware platforms, which exhibit timing anomalies, and existing schedulability analyses, which rely on timing compositionality. In addition, this thesis proposes a novel method for calculating an upper bound on the amount of interference that a given processor core can generate in any time interval of at most a given length. Our experiments demonstrate that the novel method is more precise than existing methods.Die Analyse der maximalen Ausführungszeit (Worst-Case-Execution-Time-Analyse, WCET-Analyse) ist für eingebettete Echtzeit-Computer-Systeme in sicherheitskritischen Anwendungsbereichen unerlässlich. Mehrkernprozessoren erschweren die WCET-Analyse, da einige ihrer Hardware-Komponenten von mehreren Prozessorkernen gemeinsam genutzt werden und die Ausführungszeit eines Programmes somit vom Verhalten mehrerer Kerne abhängt. Wir bezeichnen dies als Interferenz durch gemeinsam genutzte Komponenten. Die vorliegende Arbeit schlägt eine neuartige Modellierung dieser Interferenz während der WCET-Analyse vor. Der vorgestellte Ansatz ist effizient und führt auch für Computer-Systeme mit Zeitanomalien zu korrekten Ergebnissen. Darüber hinaus zeigt diese Arbeit, wie ein zeitkompositionales Verfahren auf Basis der vorgestellten Modellierung umgesetzt werden kann. Auf diese Weise schließt diese Arbeit die Lücke zwischen modernen Mikroarchitekturen, die Zeitanomalien aufweisen, und den existierenden Planbarkeitsanalysen, die sich alle auf die Kompositionalität des Zeitverhaltens verlassen. Außerdem stellt die vorliegende Arbeit ein neues Verfahren zur Berechnung einer oberen Schranke der Menge an Interferenz vor, die ein bestimmter Prozessorkern in einem beliebigen Zeitintervall einer gegebenen Länge höchstens erzeugen kann. Unsere Experimente zeigen, dass das vorgestellte Berechnungsverfahren präziser ist als die existierenden Verfahren.Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) as part of the Transregional Collaborative Research Centre SFB/TR 14 (AVACS