Model-driven registration for multi-parametric renal MRI

The use of MR imaging biomarkers is a promising technique that may assist towards faster prognosis and more accurate diagnosis of diseases like diabetic kidney disease (DKD). The quantification of MR Imaging renal biomarkers from multiparametric MRI is a process that requires a physiological model to be fitted on the data. This process can provide accurate estimates only under the assumption that there is pixelto-pixel correspondence between images acquired over different time points. However, this is rarely the case due to motion artifacts (breathing, involuntary muscle relaxation) introduced during the acquisition. Hence, it is of vital importance for a biomarkers quantification pipeline to include a motion correctionstep in order to properly align the images and enable a more accurate parameter estimation. This study aims in testing whether a Model Driven Registration (MDR), which integrates physiological models in the registration process itself, can serve as a universal solution for the registration of multiparametric renal MRI. MDR is compared with a state-of-the-art model-free motion correction approach for multiparametric MRI, that minimizes a Principal Components Analysis based metric, performing a groupwise registration. The results of the two methods are compared on T1, DTI and DCE-MRI data for a small cohort of 10 DKD patients, obtained from BEAt-DKD project’s digital database. The majority of the evaluation metrics used to compare the two methods indicated that MDR achieved better registration results, while requiring significantly lower computational times. In conclusion, MDR could be considered as the method of choice for motion correction of multiparametric quantitative renal MRI

Motion correction of free-breathing magnetic resonance renography using model-driven registration

Introduction Model-driven registration (MDR) is a general approach to remove patient motion in quantitative imaging. In this study, we investigate whether MDR can effectively correct the motion in free-breathing MR renography (MRR). Materials and methods MDR was generalised to linear tracer-kinetic models and implemented using 2D or 3D free-form deformations (FFD) with multi-resolution and gradient descent optimization. MDR was evaluated using a kidney-mimicking digital reference object (DRO) and free-breathing patient data acquired at high temporal resolution in multi-slice 2D (5 patients) and 3D acquisitions (8 patients). Registration accuracy was assessed using comparison to ground truth DRO, calculating the Hausdorff distance (HD) between ground truth masks with segmentations and visual evaluation of dynamic images, signal-time courses and parametric maps (all data). Results DRO data showed that the bias and precision of parameter maps after MDR are indistinguishable from motion-free data. MDR led to reduction in HD (HDunregistered = 9.98 ± 9.76, HDregistered = 1.63 ± 0.49). Visual inspection showed that MDR effectively removed motion effects in the dynamic data, leading to a clear improvement in anatomical delineation on parametric maps and a reduction in motion-induced oscillations on signal-time courses. Discussion MDR provides effective motion correction of MRR in synthetic and patient data. Future work is needed to compare the performance against other more established methods