Minus total domination in graphs

summary:A three-valued function $f\: V\rightarrow \{-1,0,1\}$ defined on the vertices of a graph $G=(V,E)$ is a minus total dominating function (MTDF) if the sum of its function values over any open neighborhood is at least one. That is, for every $v\in V$, $f(N(v))\ge 1$, where $N(v)$ consists of every vertex adjacent to $v$. The weight of an MTDF is $f(V)=\sum f(v)$, over all vertices $v\in V$. The minus total domination number of a graph $G$, denoted $\gamma _t^{-}(G)$, equals the minimum weight of an MTDF of $G$. In this paper, we discuss some properties of minus total domination on a graph $G$ and obtain a few lower bounds for $\gamma _t^{-}(G)$

Remarks on minus (signed) total domination in graphs

Author name used in this publication: T.C.E. ChengAuthor name also used in this publication: E.F. Shan2007-2008 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journalAccepted ManuscriptPublishe

A note on domination and minus domination numbers in cubic graphs

Author name used in this publication: C. T. Ng2005-2006 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journalAccepted ManuscriptPublishe

The domination game played on unions of graphs

Abstract In a graph G, a vertex is said to dominate itself and its neighbors. The Domination game is a two player game played on a finite graph. Players alternate turns in choosing a vertex that dominates at least one new vertex. The game ends when no move is possible, that is when the set of chosen vertices forms a dominating set of the graph. One player (Dominator) aims to minimize the size of this set while the other (Staller) tries to maximize it. The game domination number, denoted by γg, is the number of moves when both players play optimally and Dominator starts. The Staller-start game domination number γ g is defined similarly when Staller starts. It is known that the difference between these two values is at most one We first describe a family of graphs that we call no-minus graphs, for which no player gets advantage in passing a move. While it is known that forests are no-minus, we prove that tri-split graphs and dually chordal graphs also are no-minus. Then, we show that the domination game parameters of the union of two no-minus graphs can take only two values according to the domination game parameters of the initial graphs. In comparison, we also show that in the general case, up to four values may be possible

Stochastic domination: the contact process, Ising models and FKG measures

We prove for the contact process on $Z^d$, and many other graphs, that the upper invariant measure dominates a homogeneous product measure with large density if the infection rate $\lambda$ is sufficiently large. As a consequence, this measure percolates if the corresponding product measure percolates. We raise the question of whether domination holds in the symmetric case for all infinite graphs of bounded degree. We study some asymmetric examples which we feel shed some light on this question. We next obtain necessary and sufficient conditions for domination of a product measure for ``downward'' FKG measures. As a consequence of this general result, we show that the plus and minus states for the Ising model on $Z^d$ dominate the same set of product measures. We show that this latter fact fails completely on the homogenous 3-ary tree. We also provide a different distinction between $Z^d$ and the homogenous 3-ary tree concerning stochastic domination and Ising models; while it is known that the plus states for different temperatures on $Z^d$ are never stochastically ordered, on the homogenous 3-ary tree, almost the complete opposite is the case. Next, we show that on $Z^d$, the set of product measures which the plus state for the Ising model dominates is strictly increasing in the temperature. Finally, we obtain a necessary and sufficient condition for a finite number of variables, which are both FKG and exchangeable, to dominate a given product measure.Comment: 27 page

Some remarks on domination in cubic graphs

We study three recently introduced numerical invariants of graphs, namely, the signed domination number γs, the minus domination number γ- and the majority domination number γmaj. An upper bound for γs and lower bounds for γ- and γmaj are found, in terms of the order of the graph

Further results on packing related parameters in graphs

Given a graph G = (V, E), a set B subset of V (G) is a packing in G if the closed neighborhoods of every pair of distinct vertices in B are pairwise disjoint. The packing number rho(G) of G is the maximum cardinality of a packing in G. Similarly, open packing sets and open packing number are defined for a graph G by using open neighborhoods instead of closed ones. We give several results concerning the (open) packing number of graphs in this paper. For instance, several bounds on these packing parameters along with some Nordhaus-Gaddum inequalities are given. We characterize all graphs with equal packing and independence numbers and give the characterization of all graphs for which the packing number is equal to the independence number minus one. In addition, due to the close connection between the open packing and total domination numbers, we prove a new upper bound on the total domination number gamma(t)(T) for a tree T of order n >= 2 improving the upper bound gamma(t)(T) <= (n + s)/2 given by Chellali and Haynes in 2004, in which s is the number of support vertices of T