Single-edge monotonic sequences of graphs and linear-time algorithms for minimal completions and deletions

AbstractWe study graph properties that admit an increasing, or equivalently decreasing, sequence of graphs on the same vertex set such that for any two consecutive graphs in the sequence their difference is a single edge. This is useful for characterizing and computing minimal completions and deletions of arbitrary graphs into having these properties. We prove that threshold graphs and chain graphs admit such sequences. Based on this characterization and other structural properties, we present linear-time algorithms both for computing minimal completions and deletions into threshold, chain, and bipartite graphs, and for extracting a minimal completion or deletion from a given completion or deletion. Minimum completions and deletions into these classes are NP-hard to compute

On the effectiveness of the incremental approach to minimal chordal edge modification

Because edge modification problems are computationally difficult for most target graph classes, considerable attention has been devoted to inclusion-minimal edge modifications, which are usually polynomial-time computable and which can serve as an approximation of minimum cardinality edge modifications, albeit with no guarantee on the cardinality of the resulting modification set. Over the past fifteen years, the primary design approach used for inclusion-minimal edge modification algorithms is based on a specific incremental scheme. Unfortunately, nothing guarantees that the set E of edge modifications of a graph G that can be obtained in this specific way spans all the inclusion-minimal edge modifications of G. Here, we focus on edge modification problems into the class of chordal graphs and we show that for this the set E may not even contain any solution of minimum size and may not even contain a solution close to the minimum; in fact, we show that it may not contain a solution better than within an Ω(n) factor of the minimum. These results show strong limitations on the use of the current favored algorithmic approach to inclusion-minimal edge modification in heuristics for computing a minimum cardinality edge modification. They suggest that further developments might be better using other approaches.publishedVersio

Efficient enumeration of maximal split subgraphs and sub-cographs and related classes

In this paper, we are interested in algorithms that take in input an arbitrary graph $G$, and that enumerate in output all the (inclusion-wise) maximal "subgraphs" of $G$ which fulfil a given property $\Pi$. All over this paper, we study several different properties $\Pi$, and the notion of subgraph under consideration (induced or not) will vary from a result to another. More precisely, we present efficient algorithms to list all maximal split subgraphs, sub-cographs and some subclasses of cographs of a given input graph. All the algorithms presented here run in polynomial delay, and moreover for split graphs it only requires polynomial space. In order to develop an algorithm for maximal split (edge-)subgraphs, we establish a bijection between the maximal split subgraphs and the maximal independent sets of an auxiliary graph. For cographs and some subclasses , the algorithms rely on a framework recently introduced by Conte & Uno called Proximity Search. Finally we consider the extension problem, which consists in deciding if there exists a maximal induced subgraph satisfying a property $\Pi$ that contains a set of prescribed vertices and that avoids another set of vertices. We show that this problem is NP-complete for every "interesting" hereditary property $\Pi$. We extend the hardness result to some specific edge version of the extension problem

Intersection problem for Droms RAAGs

We solve the subgroup intersection problem (SIP) for any RAAG G of Droms type (i.e., with defining graph not containing induced squares or paths of length 3): there is an algorithm which, given finite sets of generators for two subgroups H,K of G, decides whether $H \cap K$ is finitely generated or not, and, in the affirmative case, it computes a set of generators for $H \cap K$. Taking advantage of the recursive characterization of Droms groups, the proof consists in separately showing that the solvability of SIP passes through free products, and through direct products with free-abelian groups. We note that most of RAAGs are not Howson, and many (e.g. F_2 x F_2) even have unsolvable SIP.Comment: 33 pages, 12 figures (revised following the referee's suggestions

Intersection problem for Droms RAAGs

We solve the subgroup intersection problem (SIP) for any RAAG G of Droms type (i.e., with defining graph not containing induced squares or paths of length 3): there is an algorithm which, given finite sets of generators for two subgroups H,K of G, decides whether $H \cap K$ is finitely generated or not, and, in the affirmative case, it computes a set of generators for $H \cap K$. Taking advantage of the recursive characterization of Droms groups, the proof consists in separately showing that the solvability of SIP passes through free products, and through direct products with free-abelian groups. We note that most of RAAGs are not Howson, and many (e.g. F_2 x F_2) even have unsolvable SIP.Comment: 33 pages, 12 figures (revised following the referee's suggestions

A survey on algorithmic aspects of modular decomposition

The modular decomposition is a technique that applies but is not restricted to graphs. The notion of module naturally appears in the proofs of many graph theoretical theorems. Computing the modular decomposition tree is an important preprocessing step to solve a large number of combinatorial optimization problems. Since the first polynomial time algorithm in the early 70's, the algorithmic of the modular decomposition has known an important development. This paper survey the ideas and techniques that arose from this line of research

Symmetries in logic programs

We investigate the structures and above all, the applications of a class of symmetric groups induced by logic programs. After establishing the relationships between minimal models of logic programs and their simplified forms, and models of their completions, we show that in general when deriving negative information, we can apply the CWA, the GCWA, and the completion procedure directly from some simplified forms of the original logic programs. The least models and the results of SLD-resolution stay invariant for definite logic programs and their simplified forms. The results of SLDNF-resolution, the standard or perfect models stay invariant for hierarchical, stratified logic programs and some of their simplified forms, respectively. We introduce a new proposal to derive negative information termed OCWA, as well as the new concepts of quasi-definite, quasi-hierarchical and quasi-stratified logic programs. We also propose semantics for them