Presenting Distributive Laws

Distributive laws of a monad T over a functor F are categorical tools for specifying algebra-coalgebra interaction. They proved to be important for solving systems of corecursive equations, for the specification of well-behaved structural operational semantics and, more recently, also for enhancements of the bisimulation proof method. If T is a free monad, then such distributive laws correspond to simple natural transformations. However, when T is not free it can be rather difficult to prove the defining axioms of a distributive law. In this paper we describe how to obtain a distributive law for a monad with an equational presentation from a distributive law for the underlying free monad. We apply this result to show the equivalence between two different representations of context-free languages

Impossibility of dimension reduction in the nuclear norm

Let $\mathsf{S}_1$ (the Schatten--von Neumann trace class) denote the Banach space of all compact linear operators $T:\ell_2\to \ell_2$ whose nuclear norm $\|T\|_{\mathsf{S}_1}=\sum_{j=1}^\infty\sigma_j(T)$ is finite, where $\{\sigma_j(T)\}_{j=1}^\infty$ are the singular values of $T$. We prove that for arbitrarily large $n\in \mathbb{N}$ there exists a subset $\mathcal{C}\subseteq \mathsf{S}_1$ with $|\mathcal{C}|=n$ that cannot be embedded with bi-Lipschitz distortion $O(1)$ into any $n^{o(1)}$-dimensional linear subspace of $\mathsf{S}_1$. $\mathcal{C}$ is not even a $O(1)$-Lipschitz quotient of any subset of any $n^{o(1)}$-dimensional linear subspace of $\mathsf{S}_1$. Thus, $\mathsf{S}_1$ does not admit a dimension reduction result \'a la Johnson and Lindenstrauss (1984), which complements the work of Harrow, Montanaro and Short (2011) on the limitations of quantum dimension reduction under the assumption that the embedding into low dimensions is a quantum channel. Such a statement was previously known with $\mathsf{S}_1$ replaced by the Banach space $\ell_1$ of absolutely summable sequences via the work of Brinkman and Charikar (2003). In fact, the above set $\mathcal{C}$ can be taken to be the same set as the one that Brinkman and Charikar considered, viewed as a collection of diagonal matrices in $\mathsf{S}_1$. The challenge is to demonstrate that $\mathcal{C}$ cannot be faithfully realized in an arbitrary low-dimensional subspace of $\mathsf{S}_1$, while Brinkman and Charikar obtained such an assertion only for subspaces of $\mathsf{S}_1$ that consist of diagonal operators (i.e., subspaces of $\ell_1$). We establish this by proving that the Markov 2-convexity constant of any finite dimensional linear subspace $X$ of $\mathsf{S}_1$ is at most a universal constant multiple of $\sqrt{\log \mathrm{dim}(X)}$