74 research outputs found
Prophet Inequalities with Limited Information
In the classical prophet inequality, a gambler observes a sequence of
stochastic rewards and must decide, for each reward ,
whether to keep it and stop the game or to forfeit the reward forever and
reveal the next value . The gambler's goal is to obtain a constant
fraction of the expected reward that the optimal offline algorithm would get.
Recently, prophet inequalities have been generalized to settings where the
gambler can choose items, and, more generally, where he can choose any
independent set in a matroid. However, all the existing algorithms require the
gambler to know the distribution from which the rewards are
drawn.
The assumption that the gambler knows the distribution from which
are drawn is very strong. Instead, we work with the much simpler
assumption that the gambler only knows a few samples from this distribution. We
construct the first single-sample prophet inequalities for many settings of
interest, whose guarantees all match the best possible asymptotically,
\emph{even with full knowledge of the distribution}. Specifically, we provide a
novel single-sample algorithm when the gambler can choose any elements
whose analysis is based on random walks with limited correlation. In addition,
we provide a black-box method for converting specific types of solutions to the
related \emph{secretary problem} to single-sample prophet inequalities, and
apply it to several existing algorithms. Finally, we provide a constant-sample
prophet inequality for constant-degree bipartite matchings.
We apply these results to design the first posted-price and multi-dimensional
auction mechanisms with limited information in settings with asymmetric
bidders
Matroid prophet inequalities and Bayesian mechanism design
Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 2012.Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.Includes bibliographical references (p. 42-44).Consider a gambler who observes a sequence of independent, non-negative random numbers and is allowed to stop the sequence at any time, claiming a reward equal to the most recent observation. The famous prophet inequality of Krengel, Sucheston, and Garling asserts that a gambler who knows the distribution of each random variable can achieve at least half as much reward, in expectation, as a "prophet" who knows the sampled values of each random variable and can choose the largest one. We generalize this result to the setting in which the gambler and the prophet are allowed to make more than one selection, subject to a matroid constraint. We show that the gambler can still achieve at least half as much reward as the prophet; this result is the best possible, since it is known that the ratio cannot be improved even in the original prophet inequality, which corresponds to the special case of rank-one matroids. Generalizing the result still further, we show that under an intersection of p matroid constraints, the prophet's reward exceeds the gambler's by a factor of at most 0(p), and this factor is also tight. Beyond their interest as theorems about pure online algoritms or optimal stopping rules, these results also have applications to mechanism design. Our results imply improved bounds on the ability of sequential posted-price mechanisms to approximate optimal mechanisms in both single-parameter and multi-parameter Bayesian settings. In particular, our results imply the first efficiently computable constant-factor approximations to the Bayesian optimal revenue in certain multi-parameter settings. This work was done in collaboration with Robert Kleinberg.by S. Matthew Weinberg.S.M
Stochastic Combinatorial Optimization via Poisson Approximation
We study several stochastic combinatorial problems, including the expected
utility maximization problem, the stochastic knapsack problem and the
stochastic bin packing problem. A common technical challenge in these problems
is to optimize some function of the sum of a set of random variables. The
difficulty is mainly due to the fact that the probability distribution of the
sum is the convolution of a set of distributions, which is not an easy
objective function to work with. To tackle this difficulty, we introduce the
Poisson approximation technique. The technique is based on the Poisson
approximation theorem discovered by Le Cam, which enables us to approximate the
distribution of the sum of a set of random variables using a compound Poisson
distribution.
We first study the expected utility maximization problem introduced recently
[Li and Despande, FOCS11]. For monotone and Lipschitz utility functions, we
obtain an additive PTAS if there is a multidimensional PTAS for the
multi-objective version of the problem, strictly generalizing the previous
result.
For the stochastic bin packing problem (introduced in [Kleinberg, Rabani and
Tardos, STOC97]), we show there is a polynomial time algorithm which uses at
most the optimal number of bins, if we relax the size of each bin and the
overflow probability by eps.
For stochastic knapsack, we show a 1+eps-approximation using eps extra
capacity, even when the size and reward of each item may be correlated and
cancelations of items are allowed. This generalizes the previous work [Balghat,
Goel and Khanna, SODA11] for the case without correlation and cancelation. Our
algorithm is also simpler. We also present a factor 2+eps approximation
algorithm for stochastic knapsack with cancelations. the current known
approximation factor of 8 [Gupta, Krishnaswamy, Molinaro and Ravi, FOCS11].Comment: 42 pages, 1 figure, Preliminary version appears in the Proceeding of
the 45th ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing (STOC13
Simple Mechanisms for Non-linear Agents
We consider agents with non-linear preferences given by private values and
private budgets. We quantify the extent to which posted pricing approximately
optimizes welfare and revenue for a single agent. We give a reduction framework
that extends the approximation of multi-agent pricing-based mechanisms from
linear utility to nonlinear utility. This reduction framework is broadly
applicable as Alaei et al. (2012) have shown that mechanisms for linear agents
can generally be interpreted as pricing-based mechanisms. We give example
applications of the framework to oblivious posted pricing (e.g., Chawla et al.,
2010), sequential posted pricing (e.g., Yan, 2011), and virtual surplus
maximization (Myerson, 1981)
Prophet Inequalities for Cost Minimization
Prophet inequalities for rewards maximization are fundamental to optimal
stopping theory with several applications to mechanism design and online
optimization. We study the cost minimization counterpart of the classical
prophet inequality, where one is facing a sequence of costs in an online manner and must stop at some point and take the last cost
seen. Given that the 's are independent, drawn from known distributions,
the goal is to devise a stopping strategy that minimizes the expected cost.
If the 's are not identically distributed, then no strategy can achieve
a bounded approximation if the arrival order is adversarial or random. This
leads us to consider the case where the 's are I.I.D.. For the I.I.D.
case, we give a complete characterization of the optimal stopping strategy, and
show that, if our distribution satisfies a mild condition, then the optimal
stopping strategy achieves a tight (distribution-dependent) constant-factor
approximation.
Our techniques provide a novel approach to analyze prophet inequalities,
utilizing the hazard rate of the distribution. We also show that when the
hazard rate is monotonically increasing (i.e. the distribution is MHR), this
constant is at most , and this is optimal for MHR distributions.
For the classical prophet inequality, single-threshold strategies can achieve
the optimal approximation factor. Motivated by this, we analyze
single-threshold strategies for the cost prophet inequality problem. We design
a threshold that achieves a
-factor approximation,
where the exponent in the logarithmic factor is a distribution-dependent
constant, and we show a matching lower bound.
We note that our results can be used to design approximately optimal posted
price-style mechanisms for procurement auctions which may be of independent
interest.Comment: 38 page
Buyback Problem - Approximate matroid intersection with cancellation costs
In the buyback problem, an algorithm observes a sequence of bids and must
decide whether to accept each bid at the moment it arrives, subject to some
constraints on the set of accepted bids. Decisions to reject bids are
irrevocable, whereas decisions to accept bids may be canceled at a cost that is
a fixed fraction of the bid value. Previous to our work, deterministic and
randomized algorithms were known when the constraint is a matroid constraint.
We extend this and give a deterministic algorithm for the case when the
constraint is an intersection of matroid constraints. We further prove a
matching lower bound on the competitive ratio for this problem and extend our
results to arbitrary downward closed set systems. This problem has applications
to banner advertisement, semi-streaming, routing, load balancing and other
problems where preemption or cancellation of previous allocations is allowed
- β¦