4 research outputs found
Robust Dynamic Selection of Tested Modules in Software Testing for Maximizing Delivered Reliability
Software testing is aimed to improve the delivered reliability of the users.
Delivered reliability is the reliability of using the software after it is
delivered to the users. Usually the software consists of many modules. Thus,
the delivered reliability is dependent on the operational profile which
specifies how the users will use these modules as well as the defect number
remaining in each module. Therefore, a good testing policy should take the
operational profile into account and dynamically select tested modules
according to the current state of the software during the testing process. This
paper discusses how to dynamically select tested modules in order to maximize
delivered reliability by formulating the selection problem as a dynamic
programming problem. As the testing process is performed only once, risk must
be considered during the testing process, which is described by the tester's
utility function in this paper. Besides, since usually the tester has no
accurate estimate of the operational profile, by employing robust optimization
technique, we analysis the selection problem in the worst case, given the
uncertainty set of operational profile. By numerical examples, we show the
necessity of maximizing delivered reliability directly and using robust
optimization technique when the tester has no clear idea of the operational
profile. Moreover, it is shown that the risk averse behavior of the tester has
a major influence on the delivered reliability.Comment: 19 pages, 4 figure
Testing effort dependent software reliability model for imperfect debugging process considering both detection and correction
This paper studies the fault detection process (FDP) and fault correction process (FCP) with the incorporation of testing effort function and imperfect debugging. In order to ensure high reliability, it is essential for software to undergo a testing phase, during which faults can be detected and corrected by debuggers. The testing resource allocation during this phase, which is usually depicted by the testing effort function, considerably influences not only the fault detection rate but also the time to correct a detected fault. In addition, testing is usually far from perfect such that new faults may be introduced. In this paper, we first show how to incorporate testing effort function and fault introduction into FDP and then develop FCP as delayed FDP with a correction effort. Various specific paired FDP and FCP models are obtained based on different assumptions of fault introduction and correction effort. An illustrative example is presented. The optimal release policy under different criteria is also discussed