The Implications of Viral Media & Advocacy: Kony 2012

This research paper analyzes the video “Kony 2012” as an example of advocacy film making and viral media. By analyzing critical sources, I draw conclusions as to why this video became the most viral video of all time and how other advocacy groups can use this phenomenon to learn about viral advocacy media. Using data from LexisNexis Academic, I track the popularity of “Kony 2012” via different forms of media (blogs, news articles, etc.) and compare my data to prior research conducted on social media sites. Ultimately, I will find that several key characteristics can be pinpointed as the primary cause for the film’s viral ability; including a pre-existing network of followers and the film’s ability to spread through social and traditional media. Additionally, I will conclude that the film’s inconsistent facts and the organizations behaviors played a role in the film’s demise

Diffusion Of Innovations And Public Communication Campaigns: An Examination Of The 4r Nutrient Stewardship Program

This project is an examination of how strategies for innovation in fertilizer application are communicated to agricultural communities. Specifically, this project examines the 4R Nutrient Stewardship Program‒a public communication campaign seeking to encourage the use of specific strategies, tools, and best practices in fertilizer application. The campaign is advanced by the Fertilizer Institute, an industry trade association, and targets local agricultural communities within the United States. To understand how this campaign functions to encourage adoption of innovative fertilizer application behaviors, this project draws on the principles of diffusion of innovations theory as well as established concepts within public relations, including issues management (Rogers, 2003)

Broadcasting to the masses or building communities: Polish political parties’ online performance during 2011 elections in international perspective

This paper analyses within the context of election contests the extent to which parties use the range of Web 2.0 tools, in particular social networking sites, weblogs and microblogs, in order to build communities online; we contrast this with the more traditional political use of the online environment for broadcasting. Using the 2011 Polish general election as a case study, we analyse the use of the online environment by all political parties, categorising features as offering a range of functions to serve visitors, from informing to allowing interaction. We also assess how different groups of visitors are targeted through different features or platforms. The data from the content analysis thus provides a rich picture of the online strategy of each party and the extent to which the Internet was used in the campaign. These data are supplemented by web cartography analysis which identifies the interlinkages between the websites of political parties, official information sources and the media. The cartography allows us to analyse the direction of traffic flow within the electoral websphere, the extent to which parties create open platforms with high levels of linkage to one another or if they maintain enclosed communities linking only to supportive sites. Overall our paper will provide an understanding of party election strategies during elections allowing discussion regarding the impact this might have on parties, media actors and voters. In particular we demonstrate how parties can use the range of web features to build communities of specific groups of visitors, in particular those with issue specific interests, those leaning towards supporting a party, and existing partisan campaigners. The use of these tools, we argue, can increase loyalty and lead to the conversion of supporters to activists. The paper leads into a discussion of how social networking tools have the potential to enhance the link between parties, members and supporters but that this depends on how the party utilises the online environment. Finally we aim to fit the Polish case study within a larger picture of political parties’ online performance during elections. Here we will compare our data on Poland with similar data which analysed the performance of parties in German 2009 general elections, parliamentary elections in Great Britain 2010 and French parliamentary election in 2012

Does Campaigning on Social Media Make a Difference? Evidence from candidate use of Twitter during the 2015 and 2017 UK Elections

Social media are now a routine part of political campaigns all over the world. However, studies of the impact of campaigning on social platform have thus far been limited to cross-sectional datasets from one election period which are vulnerable to unobserved variable bias. Hence empirical evidence on the effectiveness of political social media activity is thin. We address this deficit by analysing a novel panel dataset of political Twitter activity in the 2015 and 2017 elections in the United Kingdom. We find that Twitter based campaigning does seem to help win votes, a finding which is consistent across a variety of different model specifications including a first difference regression. The impact of Twitter use is small in absolute terms, though comparable with that of campaign spending. Our data also support the idea that effects are mediated through other communication channels, hence challenging the relevance of engaging in an interactive fashion

Applying Multiple Data Collection Tools to Quantify Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Communication on Twitter.

BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection in the United States. There are several vaccines that protect against strains of HPV most associated with cervical and other cancers. Thus, HPV vaccination has become an important component of adolescent preventive health care. As media evolves, more information about HPV vaccination is shifting to social media platforms such as Twitter. Health information consumed on social media may be especially influential for segments of society such as younger populations, as well as ethnic and racial minorities. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of our study were to quantify HPV vaccine communication on Twitter, and to develop a novel methodology to improve the collection and analysis of Twitter data. METHODS: We collected Twitter data using 10 keywords related to HPV vaccination from August 1, 2014 to July 31, 2015. Prospective data collection used the Twitter Search API and retrospective data collection used Twitter Firehose. Using a codebook to characterize tweet sentiment and content, we coded a subsample of tweets by hand to develop classification models to code the entire sample using machine learning procedures. We also documented the words in the 140-character tweet text most associated with each keyword. We used chi-square tests, analysis of variance, and nonparametric equality of medians to test for significant differences in tweet characteristic by sentiment. RESULTS: A total of 193,379 English-language tweets were collected, classified, and analyzed. Associated words varied with each keyword, with more positive and preventive words associated with HPV vaccine and more negative words associated with name-brand vaccines. Positive sentiment was the largest type of sentiment in the sample, with 75,393 positive tweets (38.99% of the sample), followed by negative sentiment with 48,940 tweets (25.31% of the sample). Positive and neutral tweets constituted the largest percentage of tweets mentioning prevention or protection (20,425/75,393, 27.09% and 6477/25,110, 25.79%, respectively), compared with only 11.5% of negative tweets (5647/48,940; P CONCLUSIONS: Examining social media to detect health trends, as well as to communicate important health information, is a growing area of research in public health. Understanding the content and implications of conversations that form around HPV vaccination on social media can aid health organizations and health-focused Twitter users in creating a meaningful exchange of ideas and in having a significant impact on vaccine uptake. This area of research is inherently interdisciplinary, and this study supports this movement by applying public health, health communication, and data science approaches to extend methodologies across fields

Emotion Dynamics of Public Opinions on Twitter

[EN] Recently, social media has been considered the fastest medium for information broadcasting and sharing. Considering the wide range of applications such as viral marketing, political campaigns, social advertisement, and so on, influencing characteristics of users or tweets have attracted several researchers. It is observed from various studies that influential messages or users create a high impact on a social ecosystem. In this study, we assume that public opinion on a social issue on Twitter carries a certain degree of emotion, and there is an emotion flow underneath the Twitter network. In this article, we investigate social dynamics of emotion present in users' opinions and attempt to understand (i) changing characteristics of users' emotions toward a social issue over time, (ii) influence of public emotions on individuals' emotions, (iii) cause of changing opinion by social factors, and so on. We study users' emotion dynamics over a collection of 17.65M tweets with 69.36K users and observe 63% of the users are likely to change their emotional state against the topic into their subsequent tweets. Tweets were coming from the member community shows higher influencing capability than the other community sources. It is also observed that retweets influence users more than hashtags, mentions, and replies.The work described in this article was carried out in the OSiNT Lab (https://www.iitg.ac.in/cseweb/osint/), Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, India. The creation of the dataset used in this study was partly supported by the Ministry of Information and Electronic Technology, Government of India.Naskar, D.; Singh, SR.; Kumar, D.; Nandi, S.; Onaindia De La Rivaherrera, E. (2020). Emotion Dynamics of Public Opinions on Twitter. ACM Transactions on Information Systems. 38(2):1-24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3379340124382Ahmed, S., Jaidka, K., & Cho, J. (2016). Tweeting India’s Nirbhaya protest: a study of emotional dynamics in an online social movement. Social Movement Studies, 16(4), 447-465. doi:10.1080/14742837.2016.1192457Andrieu, C., de Freitas, N., Doucet, A., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Machine Learning, 50(1/2), 5-43. doi:10.1023/a:1020281327116Araujo, T., Neijens, P., & Vliegenthart, R. (2016). Getting the word out on Twitter: the role of influentials, information brokers and strong ties in building word-of-mouth for brands. International Journal of Advertising, 36(3), 496-513. doi:10.1080/02650487.2016.1173765Berger, J. (2011). Arousal Increases Social Transmission of Information. Psychological Science, 22(7), 891-893. doi:10.1177/0956797611413294Bi, B., Tian, Y., Sismanis, Y., Balmin, A., & Cho, J. (2014). Scalable topic-specific influence analysis on microblogs. Proceedings of the 7th ACM international conference on Web search and data mining. doi:10.1145/2556195.2556229Bollen, J., Mao, H., & Zeng, X. (2011). Twitter mood predicts the stock market. Journal of Computational Science, 2(1), 1-8. doi:10.1016/j.jocs.2010.12.007Chen, W., Wang, C., & Wang, Y. (2010). Scalable influence maximization for prevalent viral marketing in large-scale social networks. Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining - KDD ’10. doi:10.1145/1835804.1835934Ding, Z., Jia, Y., Zhou, B., Zhang, J., Han, Y., & Yu, C. (2013). An Influence Strength Measurement via Time-Aware Probabilistic Generative Model for Microblogs. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 372-383. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-37401-2_38Ding, Z., Wang, H., Guo, L., Qiao, F., Cao, J., & Shen, D. (2015). Finding Influential Users and Popular Contents on Twitter. Web Information Systems Engineering – WISE 2015, 267-275. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-26187-4_23Feldman Barrett, L., & Russell, J. A. (1998). Independence and bipolarity in the structure of current affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(4), 967-984. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.4.967Ferrara, E., & Yang, Z. (2015). Measuring Emotional Contagion in Social Media. PLOS ONE, 10(11), e0142390. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0142390Hillmann, R., & Trier, M. (2012). Dissemination Patterns and Associated Network Effects of Sentiments in Social Networks. 2012 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining. doi:10.1109/asonam.2012.88Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., & Moon, S. (2010). What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web - WWW ’10. doi:10.1145/1772690.1772751Myers, S. A., Zhu, C., & Leskovec, J. (2012). Information diffusion and external influence in networks. Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining - KDD ’12. doi:10.1145/2339530.2339540Nguyen, H. T., Ghosh, P., Mayo, M. L., & Dinh, T. N. (2017). Social Influence Spectrum at Scale. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 36(2), 1-26. doi:10.1145/3086700Pal, A., & Counts, S. (2011). Identifying topical authorities in microblogs. Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining - WSDM ’11. doi:10.1145/1935826.1935843Peng, S., Wang, G., & Xie, D. (2017). Social Influence Analysis in Social Networking Big Data: Opportunities and Challenges. IEEE Network, 31(1), 11-17. doi:10.1109/mnet.2016.1500104nmRussell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161-1178. doi:10.1037/h0077714Shi, J., Hu, P., Lai, K. K., & Chen, G. (2018). Determinants of users’ information dissemination behavior on social networking sites. Internet Research, 28(2), 393-418. doi:10.1108/intr-01-2017-0038Silva, A., Guimarães, S., Meira, W., & Zaki, M. (2013). ProfileRank. Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Social Network Mining and Analysis - SNAKDD ’13. doi:10.1145/2501025.2501033Stieglitz, S., & Dang-Xuan, L. (2013). Emotions and Information Diffusion in Social Media—Sentiment of Microblogs and Sharing Behavior. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(4), 217-248. doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222290408Vardasbi, A., Faili, H., & Asadpour, M. (2017). SWIM. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 36(1), 1-33. doi:10.1145/3072652Wang, Y., Li, Y., Fan, J., & Tan, K.-L. (2018). Location-aware Influence Maximization over Dynamic Social Streams. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 36(4), 1-35. doi:10.1145/3230871Watts, D. J., & Dodds, P. S. (2007). Influentials, Networks, and Public Opinion Formation. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(4), 441-458. doi:10.1086/518527Weng, J., Lim, E.-P., Jiang, J., & He, Q. (2010). TwitterRank. Proceedings of the third ACM international conference on Web search and data mining - WSDM ’10. doi:10.1145/1718487.1718520Wolfsfeld, G., Segev, E., & Sheafer, T. (2013). Social Media and the Arab Spring. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(2), 115-137. doi:10.1177/1940161212471716Yik, M. S. M., Russell, J. A., & Barrett, L. F. (1999). Structure of self-reported current affect: Integration and beyond. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(3), 600-619. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.600Zhang, J., Zhang, R., Sun, J., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, C. (2016). TrueTop: A Sybil-Resilient System for User Influence Measurement on Twitter. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 24(5), 2834-2846. doi:10.1109/tnet.2015.2494059Zhang, Y., Moe, W. W., & Schweidel, D. A. (2017). Modeling the role of message content and influencers in social media rebroadcasting. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 34(1), 100-119. doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.07.003Ziegler, C.-N., & Lausen, G. (2005). Propagation Models for Trust and Distrust in Social Networks. Information Systems Frontiers, 7(4-5), 337-358. doi:10.1007/s10796-005-4807-

"Spice", "Kryptonite", "Black Mamba": An overview of brand names and marketing stragtegies of Novel Psychoactive Substances on the Web

Novel Psychoactive Substances (NPSs) are often sold online as “legal” and “safer” alternatives to International Controlled Drugs (ICDs) with captivating marketing strategies. Our aim was to review and summarize such strategies in terms of the appearance of the products, the brand names, and the latest trends in the illicit online marketplaces. Methods: Scientific data were searched in PsychInfo and Pubmed databases; results were integrated with an extensive monitoring of Internet (websites, online shops, chat rooms, fora, social networks) and media sources in nine languages (English, French, Farsi, Portuguese, Arabic, Russian, Spanish, and Chinese simplified/traditional) available from secure databases of the Global Public Health Intelligence Network. Results: Evolving strategies for the online diffusion and the retail of NPSs have been identified, including discounts and periodic offers on chosen products. Advertisements and new brand names have been designed to attract customers, especially young people. An increased number of retailers have been recorded as well as new Web platforms and privacy systems. Discussion: NPSs represent an unprecedented challenge in the field of public health with social, cultural, legal, and political implications.Web monitoring activities are essential for mapping the diffusion of NPSs and for supporting innovative Web-based prevention programmes.Peer reviewedSubmitted Versio

Like, share, vote

This report explores the potential for social media to support efforts to get out the vote. Overview Across Europe, low voter turnout in European and national elections is a growing concern. Many citizens are disengaged from the political process, threatening the health of our democracies. At the same time, the increasingly prominent role that social media plays in our lives and its function as a new digital public space offers new opportunities to reengage non-voters. This report explores the potential for social media to support efforts to get out the vote. It lays out which groups need to be the focus of voter mobilisation efforts, and makes the case for using social media campaigning as a core part of our voter mobilisation efforts. The research draws on a series of social media voter mobilisation workshops run by Demos with small third sector organisations in six target countries across Europe, as well as expert interviews, literature review and social media analysis. Having affirmed the need for and utility of social media voter turnout efforts, Like, Share, Vote establishes key principles and techniques for a successful social media campaign: how to listen to the digital discourse of your audience, how to use quizzes and interactive approaches, how to micro-target specific groups and how to coordinate offline events with online campaigns. This report concludes that, with more of our social and political lives taking place online than ever before, failing to use social media to reinvigorate our democracy would be a real missed opportunity

Exploring the democratic potential of online social networking: The scope and limitations of e-participation

Copyright © 2012 by the Association for Information Systems.The availability and promise of social networking technologies with their perceived open philosophy has increasingly inspired citizens around the world to participate in political activity on the Web. Recent examples range from opposing public policies, such as government funding cuts, to organizing revolutionary social movements, such as those in the Middle East and North Africa. Although online spaces create remarkable opportunities for various forms of political action, there are concerns over the power of existing institutions to control and even censor such interaction spaces. The objective of this article is to draw together different insights on the online engagement phenomenon, highlighting both its potential and limitations as a mechanism for fostering democratic debate and influencing policy making. We examine recent examples from Europe, the Middle East and Latin America. Finally, we summarize the implications of our work and outline directions for further research