7,206 research outputs found
One-Tape Turing Machine Variants and Language Recognition
We present two restricted versions of one-tape Turing machines. Both
characterize the class of context-free languages. In the first version,
proposed by Hibbard in 1967 and called limited automata, each tape cell can be
rewritten only in the first visits, for a fixed constant .
Furthermore, for deterministic limited automata are equivalent to
deterministic pushdown automata, namely they characterize deterministic
context-free languages. Further restricting the possible operations, we
consider strongly limited automata. These models still characterize
context-free languages. However, the deterministic version is less powerful
than the deterministic version of limited automata. In fact, there exist
deterministic context-free languages that are not accepted by any deterministic
strongly limited automaton.Comment: 20 pages. This article will appear in the Complexity Theory Column of
the September 2015 issue of SIGACT New
On the state complexity of semi-quantum finite automata
Some of the most interesting and important results concerning quantum finite
automata are those showing that they can recognize certain languages with
(much) less resources than corresponding classical finite automata
\cite{Amb98,Amb09,AmYa11,Ber05,Fre09,Mer00,Mer01,Mer02,Yak10,ZhgQiu112,Zhg12}.
This paper shows three results of such a type that are stronger in some sense
than other ones because (a) they deal with models of quantum automata with very
little quantumness (so-called semi-quantum one- and two-way automata with one
qubit memory only); (b) differences, even comparing with probabilistic
classical automata, are bigger than expected; (c) a trade-off between the
number of classical and quantum basis states needed is demonstrated in one case
and (d) languages (or the promise problem) used to show main results are very
simple and often explored ones in automata theory or in communication
complexity, with seemingly little structure that could be utilized.Comment: 19 pages. We improve (make stronger) the results in section
Multipass automata and group word problems
We introduce the notion of multipass automata as a generalization of pushdown
automata and study the classes of languages accepted by such machines. The
class of languages accepted by deterministic multipass automata is exactly the
Boolean closure of the class of deterministic context-free languages while the
class of languages accepted by nondeterministic multipass automata is exactly
the class of poly-context-free languages, that is, languages which are the
intersection of finitely many context-free languages. We illustrate the use of
these automata by studying groups whose word problems are in the above classes
- …