3,687 research outputs found
The propositional nature of human associative learning
The past 50 years have seen an accumulation of evidence suggesting that associative learning depends oil high-level cognitive processes that give rise to propositional knowledge. Yet, many learning theorists maintain a belief in a learning mechanism in which links between mental representations are formed automatically. We characterize and highlight the differences between the propositional and link approaches, and review the relevant empirical evidence. We conclude that learning is the consequence of propositional reasoning processes that cooperate with the unconscious processes involved in memory retrieval and perception. We argue that this new conceptual framework allows many of the important recent advances in associative learning research to be retained, but recast in a model that provides a firmer foundation for both immediate application and future research
Current and Future Challenges in Knowledge Representation and Reasoning
Knowledge Representation and Reasoning is a central, longstanding, and active
area of Artificial Intelligence. Over the years it has evolved significantly;
more recently it has been challenged and complemented by research in areas such
as machine learning and reasoning under uncertainty. In July 2022 a Dagstuhl
Perspectives workshop was held on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. The
goal of the workshop was to describe the state of the art in the field,
including its relation with other areas, its shortcomings and strengths,
together with recommendations for future progress. We developed this manifesto
based on the presentations, panels, working groups, and discussions that took
place at the Dagstuhl Workshop. It is a declaration of our views on Knowledge
Representation: its origins, goals, milestones, and current foci; its relation
to other disciplines, especially to Artificial Intelligence; and on its
challenges, along with key priorities for the next decade
Visual Question Answering: A Survey of Methods and Datasets
Visual Question Answering (VQA) is a challenging task that has received
increasing attention from both the computer vision and the natural language
processing communities. Given an image and a question in natural language, it
requires reasoning over visual elements of the image and general knowledge to
infer the correct answer. In the first part of this survey, we examine the
state of the art by comparing modern approaches to the problem. We classify
methods by their mechanism to connect the visual and textual modalities. In
particular, we examine the common approach of combining convolutional and
recurrent neural networks to map images and questions to a common feature
space. We also discuss memory-augmented and modular architectures that
interface with structured knowledge bases. In the second part of this survey,
we review the datasets available for training and evaluating VQA systems. The
various datatsets contain questions at different levels of complexity, which
require different capabilities and types of reasoning. We examine in depth the
question/answer pairs from the Visual Genome project, and evaluate the
relevance of the structured annotations of images with scene graphs for VQA.
Finally, we discuss promising future directions for the field, in particular
the connection to structured knowledge bases and the use of natural language
processing models.Comment: 25 page
Adaptive Cognitive Interaction Systems
Adaptive kognitive Interaktionssysteme beobachten und modellieren den Zustand ihres Benutzers und passen das Systemverhalten entsprechend an. Ein solches System besteht aus drei Komponenten: Dem empirischen kognitiven Modell, dem komputationalen kognitiven Modell und dem adaptiven Interaktionsmanager. Die vorliegende Arbeit enthält zahlreiche Beiträge zur Entwicklung dieser Komponenten sowie zu deren Kombination. Die Ergebnisse werden in zahlreichen Benutzerstudien validiert
Actor & Avatar: A Scientific and Artistic Catalog
What kind of relationship do we have with artificial beings (avatars, puppets, robots, etc.)? What does it mean to mirror ourselves in them, to perform them or to play trial identity games with them? Actor & Avatar addresses these questions from artistic and scholarly angles. Contributions on the making of "technical others" and philosophical reflections on artificial alterity are flanked by neuroscientific studies on different ways of perceiving living persons and artificial counterparts. The contributors have achieved a successful artistic-scientific collaboration with extensive visual material
A Review of Findings from Neuroscience and Cognitive Psychology as Possible Inspiration for the Path to Artificial General Intelligence
This review aims to contribute to the quest for artificial general
intelligence by examining neuroscience and cognitive psychology methods for
potential inspiration. Despite the impressive advancements achieved by deep
learning models in various domains, they still have shortcomings in abstract
reasoning and causal understanding. Such capabilities should be ultimately
integrated into artificial intelligence systems in order to surpass data-driven
limitations and support decision making in a way more similar to human
intelligence. This work is a vertical review that attempts a wide-ranging
exploration of brain function, spanning from lower-level biological neurons,
spiking neural networks, and neuronal ensembles to higher-level concepts such
as brain anatomy, vector symbolic architectures, cognitive and categorization
models, and cognitive architectures. The hope is that these concepts may offer
insights for solutions in artificial general intelligence.Comment: 143 pages, 49 figures, 244 reference
- …