A Deep Network Model for Paraphrase Detection in Short Text Messages

This paper is concerned with paraphrase detection. The ability to detect similar sentences written in natural language is crucial for several applications, such as text mining, text summarization, plagiarism detection, authorship authentication and question answering. Given two sentences, the objective is to detect whether they are semantically identical. An important insight from this work is that existing paraphrase systems perform well when applied on clean texts, but they do not necessarily deliver good performance against noisy texts. Challenges with paraphrase detection on user generated short texts, such as Twitter, include language irregularity and noise. To cope with these challenges, we propose a novel deep neural network-based approach that relies on coarse-grained sentence modeling using a convolutional neural network and a long short-term memory model, combined with a specific fine-grained word-level similarity matching model. Our experimental results show that the proposed approach outperforms existing state-of-the-art approaches on user-generated noisy social media data, such as Twitter texts, and achieves highly competitive performance on a cleaner corpus

ParaPhraser: Russian paraphrase corpus and shared task

The paper describes the results of the First Russian Paraphrase Detection Shared Task held in St.-Petersburg, Russia, in October 2016. Research in the area of paraphrase extraction, detection and generation has been successfully developing for a long time while there has been only a recent surge of interest towards the problem in the Russian community of computational linguistics. We try to overcome this gap by introducing the project ParaPhraser.ru dedicated to the collection of Russian paraphrase corpus and organizing a Paraphrase Detection Shared Task, which uses the corpus as the training data. The participants of the task applied a wide variety of techniques to the problem of paraphrase detection, from rule-based approaches to deep learning, and results of the task reflect the following tendencies: the best scores are obtained by the strategy of using traditional classifiers combined with fine-grained linguistic features, however, complex neural networks, shallow methods and purely technical methods also demonstrate competitive results.Peer reviewe

Identifying Machine-Paraphrased Plagiarism

Employing paraphrasing tools to conceal plagiarized text is a severe threat to academic integrity. To enable the detection of machine-paraphrased text, we evaluate the effectiveness of five pre-trained word embedding models combined with machine learning classifiers and state-of-the-art neural language models. We analyze preprints of research papers, graduation theses, and Wikipedia articles, which we paraphrased using different configurations of the tools SpinBot and SpinnerChief. The best performing technique, Longformer, achieved an average F1 score of 80.99% (F1=99.68% for SpinBot and F1=71.64% for SpinnerChief cases), while human evaluators achieved F1=78.4% for SpinBot and F1=65.6% for SpinnerChief cases. We show that the automated classification alleviates shortcomings of widely-used text-matching systems, such as Turnitin and PlagScan. To facilitate future research, all data, code, and two web applications showcasing our contributions are openly available

An Empirical Study of AI Generated Text Detection Tools

Since ChatGPT has emerged as a major AIGC model, providing high-quality responses across a wide range of applications (including software development and maintenance), it has attracted much interest from many individuals. ChatGPT has great promise, but there are serious problems that might arise from its misuse, especially in the realms of education and public safety. Several AIGC detectors are available, and they have all been tested on genuine text. However, more study is needed to see how effective they are for multi-domain ChatGPT material. This study aims to fill this need by creating a multi-domain dataset for testing the state-of-the-art APIs and tools for detecting artificially generated information used by universities and other research institutions. A large dataset consisting of articles, abstracts, stories, news, and product reviews was created for this study. The second step is to use the newly created dataset to put six tools through their paces. Six different artificial intelligence (AI) text identification systems, including "GPTkit," "GPTZero," "Originality," "Sapling," "Writer," and "Zylalab," have accuracy rates between 55.29 and 97.0%. Although all the tools fared well in the evaluations, originality was particularly effective across the board.Comment: 15 Pages, 4 Figures, 2 Tables, 42 Reference

Paraphrase Plagiarism Identifcation with Character-level Features

[EN] Several methods have been proposed for determining plagiarism between pairs of sentences, passages or even full documents. However, the majority of these methods fail to reliably detect paraphrase plagiarism due to the high complexity of the task, even for human beings. Paraphrase plagiarism identi cation consists in automatically recognizing document fragments that contain re-used text, which is intentionally hidden by means of some rewording practices such as semantic equivalences, discursive changes, and morphological or lexical substitutions. Our main hypothesis establishes that the original author's writing style ngerprint prevails in the plagiarized text even when paraphrases occur. Thus, in this paper we propose a novel text representation scheme that gathers both content and style characteristics of texts, represented by means of character-level features. As an additional contribution, we describe the methodology followed for the construction of an appropriate corpus for the task of paraphrase plagiarism identi cation, which represents a new valuable resource to the NLP community for future research work in this field.This work is the result of the collaboration in the framework of the CONACYT Thematic Networks program (RedTTL Language Technologies Network) and the WIQ-EI IRSES project (Grant No. 269180) within the FP7 Marie Curie action. The first author was supported by CONACYT (Scholarship 258345/224483). The second, third, and sixth authors were partially supported by CONACyT (Project Grants 258588 and 2410). The work of the fourth author was partially supported by the SomEMBED TIN2015-71147-C2-1-P MINECO research project and by the Generalitat Valenciana under the Grant ALMAMATER (PrometeoII/2014/030).Sánchez-Vega, F.; Villatoro-Tello, E.; Montes-Y-Gómez, M.; Rosso, P.; Stamatatos, E.; Villaseñor-Pineda, L. (2019). Paraphrase Plagiarism Identifcation with Character-level Features. Pattern Analysis and Applications. 22(2):669-681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10044-017-0674-zS66968122

Do Language Models Plagiarize?

Past literature has illustrated that language models (LMs) often memorize parts of training instances and reproduce them in natural language generation (NLG) processes. However, it is unclear to what extent LMs "reuse" a training corpus. For instance, models can generate paraphrased sentences that are contextually similar to training samples. In this work, therefore, we study three types of plagiarism (i.e., verbatim, paraphrase, and idea) among GPT-2 generated texts, in comparison to its training data, and further analyze the plagiarism patterns of fine-tuned LMs with domain-specific corpora which are extensively used in practice. Our results suggest that (1) three types of plagiarism widely exist in LMs beyond memorization, (2) both size and decoding methods of LMs are strongly associated with the degrees of plagiarism they exhibit, and (3) fine-tuned LMs' plagiarism patterns vary based on their corpus similarity and homogeneity. Given that a majority of LMs' training data is scraped from the Web without informing content owners, their reiteration of words, phrases, and even core ideas from training sets into generated texts has ethical implications. Their patterns are likely to exacerbate as both the size of LMs and their training data increase, raising concerns about indiscriminately pursuing larger models with larger training corpora. Plagiarized content can also contain individuals' personal and sensitive information. These findings overall cast doubt on the practicality of current LMs in mission-critical writing tasks and urge more discussions around the observed phenomena. Data and source code are available at https://github.com/Brit7777/LM-plagiarism.Comment: Accepted to WWW'2

Paraphrase Detection Using Manhattan's Recurrent Neural Networks and Long Short-Term Memory

Natural Language Processing (NLP) is a part of artificial intelligence that can extract sentence structures from natural language. Some discussions about NLP are widely used, such as Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) to summarize papers with many sentences in them. Siamese Similarity is a term that applies repetitive twin network architecture to machine learning for sentence similarity. This architecture is also called Manhattan LSTM, which can be applied to the case of detecting paraphrase sentences. The paraphrase sentence must be recognized by machine learning first. Word2vec is used to convert sentences to vectors so they can be recognized in machine learning. This research has developed paraphrase sentence detection using Siamese Similarity with word2vec embedding. The experimental results showed that the amount of training data is dominant to the new data compared to the number of times and the variation in training data. Obtained data accuracy, 800,000 pairs provide accuracy reaching 99% of training data and 82.4% of new data. These results are better than the accuracy of the new data, with half of the training data only yielding 64%. While the amount of training data did not effect on training data

Paraphrase Types for Generation and Detection

Current approaches in paraphrase generation and detection heavily rely on a single general similarity score, ignoring the intricate linguistic properties of language. This paper introduces two new tasks to address this shortcoming by considering paraphrase types - specific linguistic perturbations at particular text positions. We name these tasks Paraphrase Type Generation and Paraphrase Type Detection. Our results suggest that while current techniques perform well in a binary classification scenario, i.e., paraphrased or not, the inclusion of fine-grained paraphrase types poses a significant challenge. While most approaches are good at generating and detecting general semantic similar content, they fail to understand the intrinsic linguistic variables they manipulate. Models trained in generating and identifying paraphrase types also show improvements in tasks without them. In addition, scaling these models further improves their ability to understand paraphrase types. We believe paraphrase types can unlock a new paradigm for developing paraphrase models and solving tasks in the future.Comment: Published at EMNLP 202