3 research outputs found

    PList-based Divide and Conquer Parallel Programming

    Get PDF
    This paper details an extension of a Java parallel programming framework – JPLF. The JPLF framework is a programming framework that helps programmers build parallel programs using existing building blocks. The framework is based on {em PowerLists} and PList Theories and it naturally supports multi-way Divide and Conquer. By using this framework, the programmer is exempted from dealing with all the complexities of writing parallel programs from scratch. This extension to the JPLF framework adds PLists support to the framework and so, it enlarges the applicability of the framework to a larger set of parallel solvable problems. Using this extension, we may apply more flexible data division strategies. In addition, the length of the input lists no longer has to be a power of two – as required by the PowerLists theory. In this paper we unveil new applications that emphasize the new class of computations that can be executed within the JPLF framework. We also give a detailed description of the data structures and functions involved in the PLists extension of the JPLF, and extended performance experiments are described and analyzed

    Structured arrows : a type-based framework for structured parallelism

    Get PDF
    This thesis deals with the important problem of parallelising sequential code. Despite the importance of parallelism in modern computing, writing parallel software still relies on many low-level and often error-prone approaches. These low-level approaches can lead to serious execution problems such as deadlocks and race conditions. Due to the non-deterministic behaviour of most parallel programs, testing parallel software can be both tedious and time-consuming. A way of providing guarantees of correctness for parallel programs would therefore provide significant benefit. Moreover, even if we ignore the problem of correctness, achieving good speedups is not straightforward, since this generally involves rewriting a program to consider a (possibly large) number of alternative parallelisations. This thesis argues that new languages and frameworks are needed. These language and frameworks must not only support high-level parallel programming constructs, but must also provide predictable cost models for these parallel constructs. Moreover, they need to be built around solid, well-understood theories that ensure that: (a) changes to the source code will not change the functional behaviour of a program, and (b) the speedup obtained by doing the necessary changes is predictable. Algorithmic skeletons are parametric implementations of common patterns of parallelism that provide good abstractions for creating new high-level languages, and also support frameworks for parallel computing that satisfy the correctness and predictability requirements that we require. This thesis presents a new type-based framework, based on the connection between structured parallelism and structured patterns of recursion, that provides parallel structures as type abstractions that can be used to statically parallelise a program. Specifically, this thesis exploits hylomorphisms as a single, unifying construct to represent the functional behaviour of parallel programs, and to perform correct code rewritings between alternative parallel implementations, represented as algorithmic skeletons. This thesis also defines a mechanism for deriving cost models for parallel constructs from a queue-based operational semantics. In this way, we can provide strong static guarantees about the correctness of a parallel program, while simultaneously achieving predictable speedups.“This work was supported by the University of St Andrews (School of Computer Science); by the EU FP7 grant “ParaPhrase:Parallel Patterns Adaptive Heterogeneous Multicore Systems” (n. 288570); by the EU H2020 grant “RePhrase: Refactoring Parallel Heterogeneous Resource-Aware Applications - a Software Engineering Approach” (ICT-644235), by COST Action IC1202 (TACLe), supported by COST (European Cooperation Science and Technology); and by EPSRC grant “Discovery: Pattern Discovery and Program Shaping for Manycore Systems” (EP/P020631/1)” -- Acknowledgement
    corecore