9 research outputs found
I/O-Efficient Dynamic Planar Range Skyline Queries
We present the first fully dynamic worst case I/O-efficient data structures
that support planar orthogonal \textit{3-sided range skyline reporting queries}
in \bigO (\log_{2B^\epsilon} n + \frac{t}{B^{1-\epsilon}}) I/Os and updates
in \bigO (\log_{2B^\epsilon} n) I/Os, using \bigO
(\frac{n}{B^{1-\epsilon}}) blocks of space, for input planar points,
reported points, and parameter . We obtain the result
by extending Sundar's priority queues with attrition to support the operations
\textsc{DeleteMin} and \textsc{CatenateAndAttrite} in \bigO (1) worst case
I/Os, and in \bigO(1/B) amortized I/Os given that a constant number of blocks
is already loaded in main memory. Finally, we show that any pointer-based
static data structure that supports \textit{dominated maxima reporting
queries}, namely the difficult special case of 4-sided skyline queries, in
\bigO(\log^{\bigO(1)}n +t) worst case time must occupy space, by adapting a similar lower bounding argument for
planar 4-sided range reporting queries.Comment: Submitted to SODA 201
I/O-Efficient Planar Range Skyline and Attrition Priority Queues
In the planar range skyline reporting problem, we store a set P of n 2D
points in a structure such that, given a query rectangle Q = [a_1, a_2] x [b_1,
b_2], the maxima (a.k.a. skyline) of P \cap Q can be reported efficiently. The
query is 3-sided if an edge of Q is grounded, giving rise to two variants:
top-open (b_2 = \infty) and left-open (a_1 = -\infty) queries.
All our results are in external memory under the O(n/B) space budget, for
both the static and dynamic settings:
* For static P, we give structures that answer top-open queries in O(log_B n
+ k/B), O(loglog_B U + k/B), and O(1 + k/B) I/Os when the universe is R^2, a U
x U grid, and a rank space grid [O(n)]^2, respectively (where k is the number
of reported points). The query complexity is optimal in all cases.
* We show that the left-open case is harder, such that any linear-size
structure must incur \Omega((n/B)^e + k/B) I/Os for a query. We show that this
case is as difficult as the general 4-sided queries, for which we give a static
structure with the optimal query cost O((n/B)^e + k/B).
* We give a dynamic structure that supports top-open queries in O(log_2B^e
(n/B) + k/B^1-e) I/Os, and updates in O(log_2B^e (n/B)) I/Os, for any e
satisfying 0 \le e \le 1. This leads to a dynamic structure for 4-sided queries
with optimal query cost O((n/B)^e + k/B), and amortized update cost O(log
(n/B)).
As a contribution of independent interest, we propose an I/O-efficient
version of the fundamental structure priority queue with attrition (PQA). Our
PQA supports FindMin, DeleteMin, and InsertAndAttrite all in O(1) worst case
I/Os, and O(1/B) amortized I/Os per operation.
We also add the new CatenateAndAttrite operation that catenates two PQAs in
O(1) worst case and O(1/B) amortized I/Os. This operation is a non-trivial
extension to the classic PQA of Sundar, even in internal memory.Comment: Appeared at PODS 2013, New York, 19 pages, 10 figures. arXiv admin
note: text overlap with arXiv:1208.4511, arXiv:1207.234
Lower bounds for intersection searching and fractional cascading in higher dimension
Given an n-edge convex subdivision of the plane, is it possible to report its k intersections with a query line segment in Oðk þ polylogðnÞÞ time, using subquadratic storage? If the query is a plane and the input is a polytope with n vertices, can one achieve Oðk þ polylogðnÞÞ time with subcubic storage? Does any convex polytope have a boundary dominant Dobkin–Kirkpatrick hierarchy? Can fractional cascading be generalized to planar maps instead of linear lists? We prove that the answer to all of these questions is no, and we derive near-optimal solutions to these classical problems