ATMP: An Adaptive Tolerance-based Mixed-criticality Protocol for Multi-core Systems

© 2018 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted ncomponent of this work in other works.The challenge of mixed-criticality scheduling is to keep tasks of higher criticality running in case of resource shortages caused by faults. Traditionally, mixedcriticality scheduling has focused on methods to handle faults where tasks overrun their optimistic worst-case execution time (WCET) estimate. In this paper we present the Adaptive Tolerance based Mixed-criticality Protocol (ATMP), which generalises the concept of mixed-criticality scheduling to handle also faults of other nature, like failure of cores in a multi-core system. ATMP is an adaptation method triggered by resource shortage at runtime. The first step of ATMP is to re-partition the task to the available cores and the second step is to optimise the utility at each core using the tolerance-based real-time computing model (TRTCM). The evaluation shows that the utility optimisation of ATMP can achieve a smoother degradation of service compared to just abandoning tasks

Multiprocessor Scheduling of Precedence-constrained Mixed-Critical Jobs

International audienceThe real-time system design targeting multiprocessor platforms leads to two important complications in real-time scheduling. First, to ensure deterministic processing by communicating tasks the scheduling has to consider precedence constraints. The second complication factor is mixed criticality, i.e., integration upon a single platform of various subsystems where some are safety-critical (e.g., car braking system) and the others are not (e.g., car digital radio). Therefore we motivate and study the multiprocessor scheduling problem of a finite set of precedence-related mixed criticality jobs. This problem, to our knowledge, has never been studied if not under very specific assumptions. The main contribution of our work is an algorithm that, given a global fixed-priority assignment for jobs, can modify it in order to improve its schedulability for mixed-criticality setting. Our experiments show an increase of schedulable instances up to a maximum of 25% if compared to classical solutions for this category of scheduling problems

Combined Scheduling of Time-Triggered Plans and Priority Scheduled Task Sets

© Owner/Author (2016). This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here for your personal use. Not for redistribution. The definitive Version of Record was published in ACM SIGAda Ada Letters, 36(1), 68-76, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/10.1145/2971571.2971580.[EN] Preemptive, priority-based scheduling on the one hand, and time-triggered scheduling on the other, are the two major techniques in use for development of real-time and embedded software. Both have their advantages and drawbacks with respect to the other, and are commonly adopted in mutual exclusion. In a previous paper, we proposed a software architecture that enables the combined and controlled execution of time-triggered plans and priority-scheduled tasks. The goal was to take advantage of the best of both approaches by providing deterministic, jitter-controlled execution of time-triggered tasks (e.g., control tasks), coexisting with a set of priority-scheduled tasks, with less demanding jitter requirements. In this paper, we briefly describe the approach, in which the time-triggered plan is executed at the highest priority level, controlled by scheduling decisions taken only at particular points in time, signalled by recurrent timing events. The rest of priority levels are used by a set of concurrent tasks scheduled by static or dynamic priorities. We also discuss several open issues such as schedulability analysis, use of the approach in multiprocessor architectures, usability in mixed-criticality systems and needed changes to make this approach Ravenscar compliant.This work has been partly supported by the Spanish Government’s project M2C2 (TIN2014-56158-C4-1-P-AR) and the European Commission’s project EMC2 (ARTEMIS-JU Call 2013 AIPP-5, Contract 621429).Real Sáez, JV.; Sáez Barona, S.; Crespo Lorente, A. (2016). Combined Scheduling of Time-Triggered Plans and Priority Scheduled Task Sets. Ada Letters. 36(1):68-76. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971571.2971580S6876361T. P. Baker and A. Shaw. The cyclic executive model and Ada. In Proceedings IEEE Real Time Systems Symposium 1988, Huntsville, Alabama, pages 120--129, 1988.P. Balbastre, I. Ripoll, J. Vidal, and A. Crespo. A Task Model to Reduce Control Delays. Real-Time Systems, 27(3):215--236, September 2004.A. Burns and R. Davis. Mixed Criticality Systems - A Review. Technical report, Depatment of Computer Science, University of York, 2013.A. Cervin. Integrated Control and Real-Time Scheduling. PhD thesis, Lund Institute of Technology, April 2003.R. Dobrin. Combining Offline Schedule Construction and Fixed Priority Scheduling in Real-Time Computer Systems. PhD thesis, Mälardalen University, 2005.S. Hong, X. Hu, and M. Lemmon. Reducing Delay Jitter of Real-Time Control Tasks through Adaptive Deadline Adjustments. In IEEE Computer Society, editor, 22nd Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems -- ECRTS, pages 229--238, 2010.J. W. S. Liu. Real-Time Systems. Prentice-Hall Inc., 2000.J. Palencia and M. González-Harbour. Schedulability Analysis for Tasks with Static and Dynamic Offsets. In 9th IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium, 1998.M. J. Pont. The Engineering of Reliable Embedded Systems: LPC1769 edition. Number ISBN: 978-0-9930355-0-0. SafeTTy Systems Limited, 2014.J. Real and A. Crespo. Incorporating Operating Modes to an Ada Real-Time Framework. Ada Letters, 30(1):73--85, April 2010.J. Real, S. Sáez, and A. Crespo. Combining time-triggered plans with priority scheduled task sets. In M. Bertogna and L. M. Pinho, editors, Reliable Software Technologies -- Ada-Europe 2016, volume 9695 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, June 2016.S. Sáez, J. Real, and A. Crespo. An integrated framework for multiprocessor, multimoded real-time applications. In M. Brorsson and L. Pinho, editors, Reliable Software Technologies -- Ada-Europe 2012, volume 7308, pages 18--34. Springer-Verlag, June 2012.S. Sáez, J. Real, and A. Crespo. Implementation of Timing-Event Anities in Ada/Linux. Ada Letters, 35(1), April 2015.A. J. Wellings and A. Burns. A Framework for Real-Time Utilities for Ada 2005. Ada Letters, XXVII(2), August 2007

Mixed Critical Earliest Deadline First

International audienceUsing the advances of the modern microelectronics technology, the safety-critical systems, such as avionics, can reduce their costs by integrating multiple tasks on one device. This makes such systems essentially mixed-critical, as this brings together different tasks whose safety assurance requirements may differ significantly. In the context of mixed-critical scheduling theory, we studied the dual criticality problem of scheduling a finite set of hard real-time jobs. In this work we propose an algorithm which is proved to dominate OCBP, a state-of-the art algorithm for this problem that is optimal over fixed job priority algorithms. We show through empirical studies that our algorithm can reduce the set of non-schedulable instances by a factor of two or, under certain assumptions, by a factor of four, when compared to OCBP

A Survey of Research into Mixed Criticality Systems

This survey covers research into mixed criticality systems that has been published since Vestal’s seminal paper in 2007, up until the end of 2016. The survey is organised along the lines of the major research areas within this topic. These include single processor analysis (including fixed priority and EDF scheduling, shared resources and static and synchronous scheduling), multiprocessor analysis, realistic models, and systems issues. The survey also explores the relationship between research into mixed criticality systems and other topics such as hard and soft time constraints, fault tolerant scheduling, hierarchical scheduling, cyber physical systems, probabilistic real-time systems, and industrial safety standards

MCFlow: Middleware for Mixed-Criticality Distributed Real-Time Systems

Traditional fixed-priority scheduling analysis for periodic/sporadic task sets is based on the assumption that all tasks are equally critical to the correct operation of the system. Therefore, every task has to be schedulable under the scheduling policy, and estimates of tasks\u27 worst case execution times must be conservative in case a task runs longer than is usual. To address the significant under-utilization of a system\u27s resources under normal operating conditions that can arise from these assumptions, several \emph{mixed-criticality scheduling} approaches have been proposed. However, to date there has been no quantitative comparison of system schedulability or run-time overhead for the different approaches. In this dissertation, we present what is to our knowledge the first side-by-side implementation and evaluation of those approaches, for periodic and sporadic mixed-criticality tasks on uniprocessor or distributed systems, under a mixed-criticality scheduling model that is common to all these approaches. To make a fair evaluation of mixed-criticality scheduling, we also address some previously open issues and propose modifications to improve schedulability and correctness of particular approaches. To facilitate the development and evaluation of mixed-criticality applications, we have designed and developed a distributed real-time middleware, called MCFlow, for mixed-criticality end-to-end tasks running on multi-core platforms. The research presented in this dissertation provides the following contributions to the state of the art in real-time middleware: (1) an efficient component model through which dependent subtask graphs can be configured flexibly for execution within a single core, across cores of a common host, or spanning multiple hosts; (2) support for optimizations to inter-component communication to reduce data copying without sacrificing the ability to execute subtasks in parallel; (3) a strict separation of timing and functional concerns so that they can be configured independently; (4) an event dispatching architecture that uses lock free algorithms where possible to reduce memory contention, CPU context switching, and priority inversion; and (5) empirical evaluations of MCFlow itself and of different mixed criticality scheduling approaches both with a single host and end-to-end across multiple hosts. The results of our evaluation show that in terms of basic distributed real-time behavior MCFlow performs comparably to the state of the art TAO real-time object request broker when only one core is used and outperforms TAO when multiple cores are involved. We also identify and categorize different use cases under which different mixed criticality scheduling approaches are preferable

Ordonnancement des systèmes avec différents niveaux de criticité

Real-time safety-critical systems must complete their tasks within a given time limit. Failure to successfully perform their operations, or missing a deadline, can have severe consequences such as destruction of property and/or loss of life. Examples of such systems include automotive systems, drones and avionics among others. Safety guarantees must be provided before these systems can be deemed usable. This is usually done through certification performed by a certification authority.Safety evaluation and certification are complicated and costly even for smaller systems.One answer to these difficulties is the isolation of the critical functionality. Executing tasks of different criticalities on separate platforms prevents non-critical tasks from interfering with critical ones, provides a higher guaranty of safety and simplifies the certification process limiting it to only the critical functions. But this separation, in turn, introduces undesirable results portrayed by an inefficient resource utilization, an increase in the cost, weight, size and energy consumption which can put a system in a competitive disadvantage.To overcome the drawbacks of isolation, Mixed Criticality (MC) systems can be used. These systems allow functionalities with different criticalities to execute on the same platform. In 2007, Vestal proposed a model to represent MC-systems where tasks have multiple Worst Case Execution Times (WCETs), one for each criticality level. In addition, correctness conditions for scheduling policies were formally defined, allowing lower criticality jobs to miss deadlines or be even dropped in cases of failure or emergency situations.The introduction of multiple WCETs and different conditions for correctness increased the difficulty of the scheduling problem for MC-systems. Conventional scheduling policies and schedulability tests proved inadequate and the need for new algorithms arose. Since then, a lot of work has been done in this field.In this thesis, we contribute to the study of schedulability in MC-systems. The workload of a system is represented as a set of jobs that can describe the execution over the hyper-period of tasks or over a duration in time. This model allows us to study the viability of simulation-based correctness tests in MC-systems. We show that simulation tests can still be used in mixed-criticality systems, but in this case, the schedulability of the worst case scenario is no longer sufficient to guarantee the schedulability of the system even for the fixed priority scheduling case. We show that scheduling policies are not predictable in general, and define the concept of weak-predictability for MC-systems. We prove that a specific class of fixed priority policies are weakly predictable and propose two simulation-based correctness tests that work for weakly-predictable policies.We also demonstrate that contrary to what was believed, testing for correctness can not be done only through a linear number of preemptions.The majority of the related work focuses on systems of two criticality levels due to the difficulty of the problem. But for automotive and airborne systems, industrial standards define four or five criticality levels, which motivated us to propose a scheduling algorithm that schedules mixed-criticality systems with theoretically any number of criticality levels. We show experimentally that it has higher success rates compared to the state of the art.We illustrate how our scheduling algorithm, or any algorithm that generates a single time-triggered table for each criticality mode, can be used as a recovery strategy to ensure the safety of the system in case of certain failures.Finally, we propose a high level concurrency language and a model for designing an MC-system with coarse grained multi-core interference.Les systèmes temps-réel critiques doivent exécuter leurs tâches dans les délais impartis. En cas de défaillance, des événements peuvent avoir des catastrophes économiques. Des classifications des défaillances par rapport aux niveaux des risques encourus ont été établies, en particulier dans les domaines des transports aéronautique et automobile. Des niveaux de criticité sont attribués aux différentes fonctions des systèmes suivant les risques encourus lors d'une défaillance et des probabilités d'apparition de celles-ci. Ces différents niveaux de criticité influencent les choix d'architecture logicielle et matérielle ainsi que le type de composants utilisés pour sa réalisation. Les systèmes temps-réels modernes ont tendance à intégrer sur une même plateforme de calcul plusieurs applications avec différents niveaux de criticité. Cette intégration est nécessaire pour des systèmes modernes comme par exemple les drones (UAV) afin de réduire le coût, le poids et la consommation d'énergie. Malheureusement, elle conduit à des difficultés importantes lors de leurs conceptions. En plus, ces systèmes doivent être certifiés en prenant en compte ces différents niveaux de criticités.Il est bien connu que le problème d'ordonnancement des systèmes avec différents niveaux de criticités représente un des plus grand défi dans le domaine de systèmes temps-réel. Les techniques traditionnelles proposent comme solution l’isolation complète entre les niveaux de criticité ou bien une certification globale au plus haut niveau. Malheureusement, une telle solution conduit à une mauvaise des ressources et à la perte de l’avantage de cette intégration. En 2007, Vestal a proposé un modèle pour représenter les systèmes avec différents niveaux de criticité dont les tâches ont plusieurs temps d’exécution, un pour chaque niveau de criticité. En outre, les conditions de validité des stratégies d’ordonnancement ont été définies de manière formelle, permettant ainsi aux tâches les moins critiques d’échapper aux délais, voire d’être abandonnées en cas de défaillance ou de situation d’urgence.Les politiques de planification conventionnelles et les tests d’ordonnoncement se sont révélés inadéquats.Dans cette thèse, nous contribuons à l’étude de l’ordonnancement dans les systèmes avec différents niveaux de criticité. La surcharge d'un système est représentée sous la forme d'un ensemble de tâches pouvant décrire l'exécution sur l'hyper-période de tâches ou sur une durée donnée. Ce modèle nous permet d’étudier la viabilité des tests de correction basés sur la simulation pour les systèmes avec différents niveaux de criticité. Nous montrons que les tests de simulation peuvent toujours être utilisés pour ces systèmes, et la possibilité de l’ordonnancement du pire des scénarios ne suffit plus, même pour le cas de l’ordonnancement avec priorité fixe. Nous montrons que les politiques d'ordonnancement ne sont généralement pas prévisibles. Nous définissons le concept de faible prévisibilité pour les systèmes avec différents niveaux de criticité et nous montrons ensuite qu'une classe spécifique de stratégies à priorité fixe sont faiblement prévisibles. Nous proposons deux tests de correction basés sur la simulation qui fonctionnent pour des stratégies faiblement prévisibles.Nous montrons également que, contrairement à ce que l’on croyait, le contrôle de l’exactitude ne peut se faire que par l’intermédiaire d’un nombre linéaire de préemptions.La majorité des travaux reliés à notre domaine portent sur des systèmes à deux niveaux de criticité en raison de la difficulté du problème. Mais pour les systèmes automobiles et aériens, les normes industrielles définissent quatre ou cinq niveaux de criticité, ce qui nous a motivés à proposer un algorithme de planification qui planifie les systèmes à criticité mixte avec théoriquement un nombre quelconque de niveaux de criticité. Nous montrons expérimentalement que le taux de réussite est supérieur à celui de l’état de la technique