Linking discourse modes and situation entity types in a cross-linguistic corpus study

The main contribution of this paper is a cross-linguistic empirical analysis of two interacting levels of linguistic analysis of written text: situation entity (SE) types, the semantic types of situations evoked by clauses of text, and discourse modes (DMs), a characterization of passages at the sub-document level. We adapt an existing annotation scheme for SEs in English to be used for German data, with a detailed discussion of the most important differences. We create the first parallel corpus annotated for SEs, and the first DM-annotated corpus. We find that: (a) the adapted scheme is supported by evidence from a large-scale experimental study; (b) SEs mainly correspond to each other in parallel text, and a large part of the mismatches are systematic; (c) the DM annotation task can be performed intuitively with reasonable agreement; and (d) the annotated DMs show the predicted differences in the distributions of SE types

How did the discussion go: Discourse act classification in social media conversations

We propose a novel attention based hierarchical LSTM model to classify discourse act sequences in social media conversations, aimed at mining data from online discussion using textual meanings beyond sentence level. The very uniqueness of the task is the complete categorization of possible pragmatic roles in informal textual discussions, contrary to extraction of question-answers, stance detection or sarcasm identification which are very much role specific tasks. Early attempt was made on a Reddit discussion dataset. We train our model on the same data, and present test results on two different datasets, one from Reddit and one from Facebook. Our proposed model outperformed the previous one in terms of domain independence; without using platform-dependent structural features, our hierarchical LSTM with word relevance attention mechanism achieved F1-scores of 71\% and 66\% respectively to predict discourse roles of comments in Reddit and Facebook discussions. Efficiency of recurrent and convolutional architectures in order to learn discursive representation on the same task has been presented and analyzed, with different word and comment embedding schemes. Our attention mechanism enables us to inquire into relevance ordering of text segments according to their roles in discourse. We present a human annotator experiment to unveil important observations about modeling and data annotation. Equipped with our text-based discourse identification model, we inquire into how heterogeneous non-textual features like location, time, leaning of information etc. play their roles in charaterizing online discussions on Facebook

Typological parameters of genericity

Different languages employ different morphosyntactic devices for expressing genericity. And, of course, they also make use of different morphosyntactic and semantic or pragmatic cues which may contribute to the interpretation of a sentence as generic rather than episodic. [...] We will advance the strong hypo thesis that it is a fundamental property of lexical elements in natural language that they are neutral with respect to different modes of reference or non-reference. That is, we reject the idea that a certain use of a lexical element, e.g. a use which allows reference to particular spatio-temporally bounded objects in the world, should be linguistically prior to all other possible uses, e.g. to generic and non-specific uses. From this it follows that we do not consider generic uses as derived from non-generic uses as it is occasionally assumed in the literature. Rather, we regard these two possibilities of use as equivalent alternative uses of lexical elements. The typological differences to be noted therefore concern the formal and semantic relationship of generic and non-generic uses to each other; they do not pertain to the question of whether lexical elements are predetermined for one of these two uses. Even supposing we found a language where generic uses are always zero-marked and identical to lexical sterns, we would still not assume that lexical elements in this language primarily have a generic use from which the non-generic uses are derived. (Incidentally, none of the languages examined, not even Vietnamese, meets this criterion.

Lexical typology : a programmatic sketch

The present paper is an attempt to lay the foundation for Lexical Typology as a new kind of linguistic typology.1 The goal of Lexical Typology is to investigate crosslinguistically significant patterns of interaction between lexicon and grammar

Learning Symmetric Collaborative Dialogue Agents with Dynamic Knowledge Graph Embeddings

We study a symmetric collaborative dialogue setting in which two agents, each with private knowledge, must strategically communicate to achieve a common goal. The open-ended dialogue state in this setting poses new challenges for existing dialogue systems. We collected a dataset of 11K human-human dialogues, which exhibits interesting lexical, semantic, and strategic elements. To model both structured knowledge and unstructured language, we propose a neural model with dynamic knowledge graph embeddings that evolve as the dialogue progresses. Automatic and human evaluations show that our model is both more effective at achieving the goal and more human-like than baseline neural and rule-based models.Comment: ACL 201

Nuevos conceptos, distintos enfoques: una aproximación a la visibilidad digital (e-visibilidad) en sitios web de proyectos de investigación

[EN] In the last few years, the web has become a privileged access platform for knowledge for an increasingly globalized society. Thus, digital platforms are currently used by researchers to strengthen the visibility of their research output as well as their own. In this study we explore the concept of e-visibility as a key notion in the current digital discursive practices within the scientific context. For such purposes we have focused on international research project websites as instances of such practices.The analysis undertaken is data-driven and has revealed the existence of various entities which are made visible by means of a combination of lexicogrammatical devices together with other modes afforded by the digital platforms. Results also show that there are various types of e-visibility emerging from the combination of the entities and the lexicogrammatical and visual resources used to make them visible.[ES] En los últimos años, la web se ha convertido en una excelente plataforma de acceso al conocimiento para nuestra sociedad, cada vez más globalizada. Por ello, los investigadores utilizan las plataformas digitales para fomentar tanto la visibilidad de sus resultados de investigación como la suya propia. En este artículo exploramos el concepto de visibilidad digital (e-visibilidad) como una noción clave en las prácticas discursivas digitales dentro del contexto científico. Para estudiar estas prácticas, hemos centrado nuestro análisis en sitios web de proyectos de investigación internacionales. El análisis realizado se basa en datos y revela la existencia de varias entidades que se hacen visibles mediante la combinación de estrategias lexicogramaticales con otros modos que sólo las plataformas digitales ponen al alcance. Nuestros resultados muestran la existencia de distintos tiposde visibilidad digital que emergen de la combinación de estas entidades con los recursos lexicogramaticales y visuales utilizados para hacerles visibles.This research has been funded by the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (FFI2017 84205-P), the Gobierno de Aragón (Spain) (H16_17R) and Ibercaja-Unizar (JIUZ-2018-HUM-03).Lorés-Sanz, R.; Herrando-Rodrigo, I. (2020). New concepts, different approaches: tackling e-visibility in research project websites. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas. 15(1):83-98. https://doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2020.12782OJS8398151Albalat-Mascarell, A., & Carrió-Pastor, M.L. (2019). "Self-representation in political campaign talk: A functional metadiscourse approach to self-mentions in televised presidential debates." Journal of Pragmatics, 147, 86-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.011Barbour, K., & Marshall, P. (2012). "The Academic Online: Constructing Persona Through the World Wide Web." First Monday, 17/9. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v0i0.3969Biber, D., & Finegan, E. (1989). "Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect." Text, 9, 93-124. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1989.9.1.93Bordet, G. (2013). "The Rhetorical Role of 'Collocational Chains' and their Implications in the Building of Scientific Discourse Strategies." European Journal of English Studies, 17/3, 235-250. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825577.2013.867183Breivega, K., Dahl, T., & Fløttum, K. (2002). "Traces of self and others in research articles. A comparative pilot study of English, French and Norwegian research articles in medicine, economics and linguistics." International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12/2, 218-239. https://doi.org/10.1111/1473-4192.00032Charles, M. (2004). The Construction of Stance: A Corpus-based Investigation of Two Contrasting Disciplines. University of Birmingham. PhD Thesis. (Unpublished).Crismore, A., & Abdollahzadeh, E. (2010). "A review of recent metadiscourse studies: The Iranian context." Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9/2, 195-218. https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.223Dahl, T. (2004). "Textual metadiscourse in research articles: A marker of national culture or of academic discipline?" Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1807-1825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.05.004Dressen-Hammouda, D. (2014). "Measuring the voice of disciplinarity in scientific writing: A longitudinal exploration of experienced writers in geology." English for Specific Purposes, 34, 14-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2013.10.001Ferrari, L. (2003). "Marcadores de modalidad epistémica en artículos de investigación." In M. García-Wegroni (ed.) Actas del Congreso Internacional La Argumentación. Buenos Aires: Instituto de Lingüística. Sociedad. Barcelona: Gedisa, 69-93.Giannoni, D.S. (2010) "Metaphoric Values and Disciplinary Identity in English Research Articles." In G. Garzone & J. Archibald (eds.) Discourse, Identities and Roles in Specialized Communication. Linguistic Insights Vol. 125. Bern: Peter Lang, 279-298.Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of Talk. Oxford: OUP.Gosden, H. (1993). "Discourse functions of marked theme in scientific research articles." English for Specific Purposes, 11, 207-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(05)80010-9Gotti, M. (2010). "Identity traits in written academic discourse across languages." In R. Lorés-Sanz, P. Mur-Dueñas, P. & E. Lafuente-Millán (eds.) Constructing Interpersonality. Multiple Perspectives on Written Academic Genres, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 49-60.Halliday, M.A.K., & Martin, J. (1993). Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. London: Falmer Press.Harwood, N. (2005a). "Nowhere has anyone attempted… In this article I aim to do just that': A corpus-based study of self-promotional I and we in academic writing across four disciplines." Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1207-1231.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.01.012Harwood, N. (2005b). "'We do not seem to have a theory... the theory I present here attempts to fill this gap': inclusive and exclusive pronouns in academic writing." Applied Linguistics, 26/3, 343-375. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami012Henderson, W., & Hewings, A. (1990). "A language of model building." In T. Dudley-Evans & Henderson, W (eds.). The language of economics: The analysis of economics discourse. London: Modern English Publication in Association with the British Council. ELT Documents 134: 43-54.Herrando-Rodrigo, I. (2019). "Raising awareness around writers' voice in academic discourse. An analysis of writers' (in)visibility." Brno Studies in English, 45/2, 49-72. https://doi.org/10.5817/BSE2019-2-3Herring, S.C. (2012). "Discourse in Web 2.0: Familiar, Reconfigured, and Emergent." In D. Tannen & A. M. Tester (eds.) Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics. Washington, DC: Georgetown Univ. Press, 1-25.Hodge, R., & Kress, G. (1979). Language and Ideology. London/New York: Routledge.Hunston, S., & Thompson, G. (2000). Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.54Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Bloomsbury.Hyland, K. (2010). "Community and Individuality: Performing Identity in Applied Linguistics." Written Communication, 27/2, 159-188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088309357846Hyland, K., & Sancho, C. (2012). Stance and Voice in Academic Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137030825Ivanič, R. (1998). Writing and Identity: The Discoursal Construction of Identity in Academic Writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.5Ivorra Pérez, F.M. (2015). "The impact of cultural dimensions and politeness on the engagement markers of Spanish, British and US business websites." In M. Hernández-López & L. Fernández-Amaya (eds.) Studies in Pragmatics 14: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Service Encounters. Boston: Brill. Leiden, 139-163. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004260160_008Ivorra Pérez, F.M. (2016). "Interpersonality and culture: an approach to the movie review genre." Odisea, 17, 159-183.https://doi.org/10.25115/odisea.v0i17.358Jewitt, C. (ed.) (2013). The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. London: Routledge.Jewitt, C. (2016). "Multimodal analysis." In A. Georgakopoulou & T. Spilioti (eds.) Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication. London: Routledge,69-84.John, S. (2005). The Writing Process and Writing Identity: Investigating the Influence of Revision on Linguistic and Textual Features of Writer Identity in Dissertations. UK: University of Birmingham. PhD Thesis (Unpublished).Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A Social semiotic approach to communication. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203970034Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203619728Lewin, B. A. (1998). "Hedging: from and function in scientific research texts." In I. Fortanet & T. Dudley-Evans (eds.) Genre Studies in English for Academic Purposes. Castelló de la Plana: Publicaciones de la Universitat Jaume I: 89-104.Lorés-Sanz, R. (2008). "Authorial visibility in research article and research article abstracts: the intergeneric perspective." In S. Burgess & P. Martín-Martín (eds.) English as an Additional Language in Research Publication and Communication. Berlin: Peter Lang, 105-122.Lorés-Sanz, R. (2011a). "The construction of the author's voice in academic writing: the interplay of cultural and disciplinary factors." Text & Talk, 31/2, 173-193. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2011.008Lorés-Sanz, R. (2011b). "The study of authorial voice: using a Spanish-English corpus to explore linguistic transference." Corpora, 6/1, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2011.0002Lorés-Sanz, R., Mur-Dueñas, P., & Lafuente Millán, E. (2010). Constructing Interpersonality: Multiple Perspectives on Written Academic Genres. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Luzón, M.J. (2018). "Constructing academic identities online: Identity performance in research group blogs written by multilingual scholars." Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 33, 24-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.01.004Martin, J.R. & White, M. (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910Martínez, I.A. (2001). "Impersonality in the research article as revealed by analysis of the transitivity system." English for Specific Purposes, 20/3, 227-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00013-2Martínez, I.A. (2005). "Native and non-native writer's use of first person pronouns in the different sections of biology research articles in English." Journal of Second Language Writing, 14/3, 174-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.06.001Miller, C.R. (2014). "Genre as social action (1984), revisited 30 years later (2014)." Letras & Letras, 31/3, 56-72. https://doi.org/10.14393/LL63-v31n3a2015-5Mur-Dueñas, P., Lorés-Sanz, R., & Lafuente Millán, E. (2010). "Editorial." Journal of English for Academic Purposes (Special Issue on Interpersonality in Academic Writing), 9/2, 83-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.006Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). "Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse." English for Specific Purposes, 13/2, 149-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90013-2Salager-Meyer, F., Alcaraz-Ariza, M.A., & Zambrano, N. (2003). "The scimitar, the dagger and the glove: Intercultural differences in the rhetoric of criticism in Spanish, French and English medical discourse (1930-1995)." English for Specific Purposes, 22/3, 223-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(02)00019-4Stock, I., & Eik-Nes, N. (2016). "Voice features in academic texts - A review of empirical studies." Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 24, 89-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.12.006Stubbs, M. (1996). Text and Corpus Linguistics: Computer-Assisted Studies of Language and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.Suau-Jiménez, F. (2016). "What can the discursive construction of stance and engagement voices in traveler forums and tourism promotional websites bring to a cultural, cross-generic and disciplinary view of interpersonality?" Ibérica, 31, 199-220.Suau-Jiménez, F., Lorés-Sanz, R., Mapelli, G., & Herrando-Rodrigo, I. (in press). "La interpersonalidad discursiva como propuesta alternativa al metadiscurso interpersonal." Onomázein, 54.Tang, R. (2004). An Approach to Written Academic Voice: Exploring the Interpersonal Negotiations in Student Academic Writing Through APPRAISAL. University of Birmingham. PhD Thesis (Unpublished).Tang, R. & John, S. (1999). "The 'I' in identity: Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through the first person pronoun". English Specific Purposes, 18, 23-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(99)00009-5Thurlow, C., & Mroczek, K. (2011). "Introduction. Fresh Perspectives on New Media Sociolinguistics." In C. Thurlow. & Mroczek, K. (eds.) Digital Discourse: Language in the New Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press, xix-xliv. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795437.001.0001Turiman, S., Abdullah, N., & Noor, M. (2018). "Spoken metadiscourse in Malaysian ESL job interviews." Journal of Language Studies, 18/3, 135-152. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2018-1803-08Wise, L. (2005). "Blogs versus discussion forums in postgraduate on line continuing medical education". BlogTalk conference paper. Sydney.Yakhontova, T. (2006). "Cultural and disciplinary variation in academic discourse: The issue of influencing factors." Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 153-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.03.002Yamamoto, M. (2006). Agency and Impersonality: Their Linguistic and Cultural Manifestations. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.7

Identifying communicative functions in discourse with content types

Texts are not monolithic entities but rather coherent collections of micro illocutionary acts which help to convey a unitary message of content and purpose. Identifying such text segments is challenging because they require a fine-grained level of analysis even within a single sentence. At the same time, accessing them facilitates the analysis of the communicative functions of a text as well as the identification of relevant information. We propose an empirical framework for modelling micro illocutionary acts at clause level, that we call content types, grounded on linguistic theories of text types, in particular on the framework proposed by Werlich in 1976. We make available a newly annotated corpus of 279 documents (for a total of more than 180,000 tokens) belonging to different genres and temporal periods, based on a dedicated annotation scheme. We obtain an average Cohen’s kappa of 0.89 at token level. We achieve an average F1 score of 74.99% on the automatic classification of content types using a bi-LSTM model. Similar results are obtained on contemporary and historical documents, while performances on genres are more varied. This work promotes a discourse-oriented approach to information extraction and cross-fertilisation across disciplines through a computationally-aided linguistic analysis

Un análisis de parecido familiar de la construcción media: un enfoque funcional-cognitivo

This doctoral dissertation aims at delimiting the lexical-semantic and discourse-pragmatic features that regulate well-formedness in middle expressions and which could legitimate the adscription of a particular nominal, verb, or adjunct to the middle construction in English. The middle construction is here analysed in terms of its prototype effects (cf. Taylor, 1995; Langacker, 2008; Sakamoto, 2001; Goldberg, 1995; and Marín Arrese, 2001 and 2013), hence accommodating not only prototypical instances but also marginal structures largely ignored in the literature. This dissertation examines the prototype effects of the middle construction by exploring the Agent-like features of the Subject entity, the aspectuality of the verb, the role of the implicit Agent, and the nature of the middle adjunct. The structures analysed here conform a family of intransitive constructions that are understood as segments on the Unergative – Middle – Ergative continuum. The idea that the middle construction can actually be considered as a prototype category accommodating central and marginal structures contrasts with the postulates of the projectionist model (cf. Pinker, 1989; Ackema and Schoorlemmer, 1994; Hale and Keyser, 2002; and Fagan, 1992). The projectionist approach cannot account for the process of lexical-constructional interaction of the middle construction in an entirely satisfactory way. This is so because it does not attend to the prototype effects and discourse-pragmatic factors surrounding the middle construction, since it merely focuses on the structural information (cf. Hundt, 2007: 60; and Lemmens, 1998: 4). Therefore, it seems to be pertinent to apply the notions of ‘family-resemblance’ (cf. Wittgenstein, 1958) and ‘prototype effects’ (cf. Taylor, 1995) to the study of the middle construction, following cognitive-linguistic perspectives such as those of Lakoff (1987), Langacker (1987, 1991, 2008), Taylor (1995), and Goldberg (1995, 2006). The theory of prototypes allows for the application of the idea of a family-resemblance relation among different but related structures in order to justify the accommodation of non-prototypical cases into the prototype category. This doctoral dissertation applies a usage-based methodology to carry out a corpus study of contextualised examples. The compilation process has been conducted through the ‘Concordance’ within the Sketch Engine tool. The total sample retrieved and analysed here is 14099 instances, based on colloconstructional schemas which combine ±Animate subject entities with 254 different verbal predicates (cf. Levin, 1993), collocated with middable adjuncts (cf. Davidse and Heyvaert, 2007). The family-resemblance analysis challenges the traditionally accepted restricting features associated with the middle construction, thus demonstrating that both central and marginal structures can be accommodated within the middle prototype category. This is due to the fact that the segments of the continuum share certain commonalities with respect to their syntactic, semantic, pragmatic and cognitive underlying schemas, as well as a functional symmetry in the underlying structure of the subject and the verb (cf. Rijkhoff, 1991, 2002, 2008a and 2008b). In addition, the family-resemblance analysis of the middle prototype category is also based on the similarities and differences found across the family members examined in terms of their processes of Compositional Cospecification (cf. Yoshimura, 1998; Yoshimura and Taylor, 2004). Such process involves the specification of the semantics of the predicate in accordance with the meaning of the nominal and the semantic value of the adjunct in the middle construction. The family of constructions analysed includes: (i) prototypical action-oriented middles; (ii) prototypical ergative-like middles; (iii) the metonymically-motivated extensions of the action-oriented prototype (namely, Locative, Means, and Circumstanceof- Instrument middles); and (iv) metonymically-motivated extensions from the ergativelike prototype (namely, Agent-Instrument and Experiencer-Subject middles). Corpus data reveal that prototypical ergative-like middles are the most productive group (with 6801 instances, 68.24%), followed by prototypical action-oriented-middles (with 3633 examples, 25.77%). Among the metonymically-motivated extensions, the most productive structures are Experiencer-Subject middles (with 1789 instances, 12.69%), followed by Agent-Instrument middles (with 286 examples, 2.03%), whereas the least frequent types are Locative middles (with 48 instances, 0.34%), Means middles (with 60 examples, 0.43%), and Circumstance-of-Instrument middles (with 7 instances, 0.05%). The rest of corpus examples belong to the semantic types of Destiny- and Resultoriented middles (with 1475 instances, 10.46%).El propósito de esta tesis es delimitar las características léxico-semánticas y discursivo-pragmáticas que regulan la formación de expresiones medias y que podrían legitimar la adscripción de un determinado nominal, verbo o adjunto a la construcción media inglesa. La construcción media se analiza en términos de sus efectos prototípicos (cf. Taylor, 1995; Langacker, 2008; Sakamoto, 2001; Goldberg, 1995; y Marín Arrese, 2001 y 2013), acomodando no sólo ejemplos centrales sino también estructuras marginales generalmente ignoradas en la literatura. Esta tesis doctoral examina los efectos prototípicos de la construcción media mediante la exploración de las características pseudo-agentivas de la entidad sujeto, la aspectualidad del verbo, el rol del argumento agente implícito y la naturaleza del adjunto. Las estructuras analizadas forman una familia de construcciones intransitivas que se entienden como segmentos del continuo Inergativo – Medio – Ergativo. La idea de que la construcción media, de hecho, pueda considerarse como una categoría prototípica que acomoda estructuras centrales y periféricas contrasta con los postulados del modelo proyeccionista (cf. Pinker, 1989; Ackema y Schoorlemmer, 1994; Hale y Keyser, 2002; y Fagan, 1992). Dicho modelo no puede dar cuenta del proceso de interacción léxico-construccional de la construcción media de forma satisfactoria. Esto se debe a que el modelo proyeccionista no atiende a los efectos prototípicos y los factores discursivo-pragmáticos de la construcción media, ya que se centra únicamente en la información estructural (cf. Hundt, 2007: 60; y Lemmens, 1998: 4). Por ello, parece pertinente aplicar las nociones de ‘parecido familiar’ (cf. Wittgenstein, 1958) y ‘efectos prototípicos’ (cf. Taylor, 1995) al estudio de la construcción media, siguiendo perspectivas cognitivistas tales como las de Lakoff (1987), Langacker (1987, 1991, 2008), Taylor (1995) y Goldberg (1995, 2006). La teoría de los prototipos permite la aplicación de la idea de una relación de parecido familiar entre estructuras distintas pero relacionadas, justificando así la acomodación de casos marginales dentro de la categoría prototípica. Esta tesis doctoral aplica una metodología basada en el uso para llevar a cabo un estudio de corpus de ejemplos contextualizados. El proceso de compilación se ha llevado a cabo a través de la sección ‘Concordancia’ de la herramienta Sketch Engine. La muestra total analizada aquí es de 14099 ejemplos, basados en esquemas colo-construccionales en los que se combinan entidades de sujeto ±Animadas y 254 predicados verbales distintos (cf. Levin, 1993), colocados con adverbios compatibles con la construcción media (cf. Davidse y Heyvaert, 2007). El análisis de parecido familiar cuestiona las características restrictivas tradicionalmente asociadas con la construcción media, demostrando así que tanto las estructuras centrales como las marginales pueden acomodarse dentro de la categoría prototípica media. Esto se debe a que todos los segmentos del continuo comparten ciertas semejanzas con respecto a sus esquemas subyacentes de naturaleza sintáctica, semántica, pragmática y cognitiva, así como una simetría funcional en la estructura subyacente del sujeto y el predicado (cf. Rijkhoff, 1991, 2002, 2008a y 2008b). Además, el análisis de parecido familiar de la categoría prototípica media también se basa en las similitudes y diferencias encontradas entre los miembros de la familia de estructuras examinadas en función de sus procesos de Coespecificación Composicional (cf. Yoshimura, 1998; Yoshimura y Taylor, 2004). Dicho proceso se refiere a que la semántica del verbo se especifica de acuerdo con el significado del nominal y el valor semántico del adjunto en la construcción media. La familia de construcciones analizadas incluye: (i) medias prototípicas orientadas a la acción; (ii) medias prototípicas de naturaleza ergativa; (iii) extensiones metonímicamente motivadas de las medias prototípicas orientadas a la acción (concretamente, locativas, de medio e instrumentales de circunstancia); y (iv) extensiones metonímicamente motivadas de las medias prototípicas de naturaleza ergativa (concretamente, agentivo-instrumentales y de sujeto experimentador). Los datos del corpus examinado revelan que las medias prototípicas de naturaleza ergativa son las más productivas (con 6801 ejemplos, 68.24%), seguidas de las medias prototípicas orientadas a la acción (con 3633 ejemplos, 25.77%). Entre las extensiones motivadas metonímicamente, las estructuras más productivas son las medias de sujeto experimentador (con 1789 ejemplos 12.69%), seguidas de las medias agentivo-instrumentales (con 286 ejemplos, 2.03%), mientras que las menos frecuentes pertenecen a la clase de locativas (con 48 ejemplos, 0.34%), de medio (con 60 ejemplos, 0.43%), e instrumentales de circunstancia (con 7 ejemplos, 0.05%). El resto de ejemplos del corpus pertenecen a los tipos semánticos de medias orientadas al Destino y Resultado (con 1475 ejemplos, 10.46%)