38,803 research outputs found

    Large weight code words in projective space codes

    Get PDF
    AbstractRecently, a large number of results have appeared on the small weights of the (dual) linear codes arising from finite projective spaces. We now focus on the large weights of these linear codes. For q even, this study for the code Ck(n,q)⊥ reduces to the theory of minimal blocking sets with respect to the k-spaces of PG(n,q), odd-blocking the k-spaces. For q odd, in a lot of cases, the maximum weight of the code Ck(n,q)⊥ is equal to qn+⋯+q+1, but some unexpected exceptions arise to this result. In particular, the maximum weight of the code C1(n,3)⊥ turns out to be 3n+3n-1. In general, the problem of whether the maximum weight of the code Ck(n,q)⊥, with q=3h (h⩾1), is equal to qn+⋯+q+1, reduces to the problem of the existence of sets of points in PG(n,q) intersecting every k-space in 2(mod3) points

    Second-Order Weight Distributions

    Full text link
    A fundamental property of codes, the second-order weight distribution, is proposed to solve the problems such as computing second moments of weight distributions of linear code ensembles. A series of results, parallel to those for weight distributions, is established for second-order weight distributions. In particular, an analogue of MacWilliams identities is proved. The second-order weight distributions of regular LDPC code ensembles are then computed. As easy consequences, the second moments of weight distributions of regular LDPC code ensembles are obtained. Furthermore, the application of second-order weight distributions in random coding approach is discussed. The second-order weight distributions of the ensembles generated by a so-called 2-good random generator or parity-check matrix are computed, where a 2-good random matrix is a kind of generalization of the uniformly distributed random matrix over a finite filed and is very useful for solving problems that involve pairwise or triple-wise properties of sequences. It is shown that the 2-good property is reflected in the second-order weight distribution, which thus plays a fundamental role in some well-known problems in coding theory and combinatorics. An example of linear intersecting codes is finally provided to illustrate this fact.Comment: 10 pages, accepted for publication in IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, May 201

    Some new constructions of optimal linear codes and alphabet-optimal (r,δ)(r,\delta)-locally repairable codes

    Full text link
    In distributed storage systems, locally repairable codes (LRCs) are designed to reduce disk I/O and repair costs by enabling recovery of each code symbol from a small number of other symbols. To handle multiple node failures, (r,δ)(r,\delta)-LRCs are introduced to enable local recovery in the event of up to δ−1\delta-1 failed nodes. Constructing optimal (r,δ)(r,\delta)-LRCs has been a significant research topic over the past decade. In \cite{Luo2022}, Luo \emph{et al.} proposed a construction of linear codes by using unions of some projective subspaces within a projective space. Several new classes of Griesmer codes and distance-optimal codes were constructed, and some of them were proved to be alphabet-optimal 22-LRCs. In this paper, we first modify the method of constructing linear codes in \cite{Luo2022} by considering a more general situation of intersecting projective subspaces. This modification enables us to construct good codes with more flexible parameters. Additionally, we present the conditions for the constructed linear codes to qualify as Griesmer codes or achieve distance optimality. Next, we explore the locality of linear codes constructed by eliminating elements from a complete projective space. The novelty of our work lies in establishing the locality as (2,p−2)(2,p-2), (2,p−1)(2,p-1), or (2,p)(2,p)-locality, in contrast to the previous literature that only considered 22-locality. Moreover, by combining analysis of code parameters and the C-M like bound for (r,δ)(r,\delta)-LRCs, we construct some alphabet-optimal (2,δ)(2,\delta)-LRCs which may be either Griesmer codes or not Griesmer codes. Finally, we investigate the availability and alphabet-optimality of (r,δ)(r,\delta)-LRCs constructed from our modified framework.Comment: 25 page

    Equidistant Codes in the Grassmannian

    Full text link
    Equidistant codes over vector spaces are considered. For kk-dimensional subspaces over a large vector space the largest code is always a sunflower. We present several simple constructions for such codes which might produce the largest non-sunflower codes. A novel construction, based on the Pl\"{u}cker embedding, for 1-intersecting codes of kk-dimensional subspaces over \F_q^n, n≥(k+12)n \geq \binom{k+1}{2}, where the code size is qk+1−1q−1\frac{q^{k+1}-1}{q-1} is presented. Finally, we present a related construction which generates equidistant constant rank codes with matrices of size n×(n2)n \times \binom{n}{2} over \F_q, rank n−1n-1, and rank distance n−1n-1.Comment: 16 page

    (2,1)-separating systems beyond the probabilistic bound

    Full text link
    Building on previous results of Xing, we give new lower bounds on the rate of intersecting codes over large alphabets. The proof is constructive, and uses algebraic geometry, although nothing beyond the basic theory of linear systems on curves. Then, using these new bounds within a concatenation argument, we construct binary (2,1)-separating systems of asymptotic rate exceeding the one given by the probabilistic method, which was the best lower bound available up to now. This answers (negatively) the question of whether this probabilistic bound was exact, which has remained open for more than 30 years. (By the way, we also give a formulation of the separation property in terms of metric convexity, which may be an inspirational source for new research problems.)Comment: Version 7 is a shortened version, so that numbering should match with the journal version (to appear soon). Material on convexity and separation in discrete and continuous spaces has been removed. Readers interested in this material should consult version 6 instea

    The maximum number of minimal codewords in an [n,k]−[n,k]-code

    Full text link
    Upper and lower bounds are derived for the quantity in the title, which is tabulated for modest values of nn and k.k. An application to graphs with many cycles is given.Comment: 6 pp. Submitte
    • …
    corecore