3 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Using Bikeshare Datasets to Improve Urban Cycling Experience and Research Urban Cycling Behaviour
With access to public and shared transport systems becoming increasingly digitized, transaction datasets of unprecedented size as well as temporal and spatial precision are automatically generated (Blythe and Bryan 2007; Bagchi and White 2005; Pelletier et al. 2011). Data collected through smartcard payment methods are perhaps the largest and most obvious example. Although introduced for the purpose of improving payment processes, such data provide a detailed view of demand on a transport system, the potential for service improvements to be suggested (Ferrari et al. 2014) and an opportunity for studying individual traveller behaviour (Agard et al. 2006; Morency et al. 2006; Lathia et al. 2013). A substantial benefit of such data over more traditional data collection methods is that a complete and total record of usage for every smartcard customer is automatically generated (Bagchi and White 2005). Problems associated with sampling and recall bias, which make actively collected travel surveys somewhat difficult to administer, are avoided. The two most obvious disadvantages, at least for travel behaviour research, are that those individuals using smartcard technology may not be representative of the total population using that system or navigating a city more generally; and that variables such as individual trip purpose can only be inferred since they are not recorded directly
Recommended from our members
Comparing cities’ cycling patterns using online shared bicycle maps
Bicycle sharing systems are increasingly being deployed in urban areas around the world, alongside online maps that disclose the state (i.e., location, number of bicycles/number of free parking slots) of stations in each city. Recent work has demonstrated how regularly monitoring these online maps allows for a granular analysis of a city’s cycling trends; further, the literature indicates that different cities have unique spatio-temporal patterns, reducing the generalisability of any insights or models derived from a single system. In this work, we analyse 4.5 months of online bike-sharing map data from 10 cities which, combined, have 996 stations. While an aggregate comparison supports the view of cities having unique usage patterns, results of applying unsupervised learning to the temporal data shows that, instead, only the larger systems display heterogeneous behaviour, indicating that many of these systems share intrinsic similarities. We further show how these similarities are reflected in the predictability of stations’ occupancy data via a cross-city comparison of the error that a variety of approaches achieve when forecasting the number of bicycles that a station will have in the near future.We close by discussing the impact of uncovering these similarities on how future bicycle sharing systems can be designed, built, and managed.This is the accepted manuscript. The final published version is available at http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11116-015-9599-9