4,321 research outputs found
Representations of measurable sets in computable measure theory
This article is a fundamental study in computable measure theory. We use the
framework of TTE, the representation approach, where computability on an
abstract set X is defined by representing its elements with concrete "names",
possibly countably infinite, over some alphabet {\Sigma}. As a basic
computability structure we consider a computable measure on a computable
-algebra. We introduce and compare w.r.t. reducibility several natural
representations of measurable sets. They are admissible and generally form four
different equivalence classes. We then compare our representations with those
introduced by Y. Wu and D. Ding in 2005 and 2006 and claim that one of our
representations is the most useful one for studying computability on measurable
functions
Glass half empty? politics and institutions in the liberalization of the fixed line telecommunications industry in Turkey
This chapter reviews Turkish experience with reform of the fixed line telecommunications industry. It provides an account of earlier incoherent attempts to privatize the incumbent operator in the absence of any regulatory framework or political consensus. It also describes the regulatory framework emerged in early 2000s and discusses the various political-economic and institutional factors behind its weak implementation, and hence its limited success in promoting competition
Weihrauch goes Brouwerian
We prove that the Weihrauch lattice can be transformed into a Brouwer algebra
by the consecutive application of two closure operators in the appropriate
order: first completion and then parallelization. The closure operator of
completion is a new closure operator that we introduce. It transforms any
problem into a total problem on the completion of the respective types, where
we allow any value outside of the original domain of the problem. This closure
operator is of interest by itself, as it generates a total version of Weihrauch
reducibility that is defined like the usual version of Weihrauch reducibility,
but in terms of total realizers. From a logical perspective completion can be
seen as a way to make problems independent of their premises. Alongside with
the completion operator and total Weihrauch reducibility we need to study
precomplete representations that are required to describe these concepts. In
order to show that the parallelized total Weihrauch lattice forms a Brouwer
algebra, we introduce a new multiplicative version of an implication. While the
parallelized total Weihrauch lattice forms a Brouwer algebra with this
implication, the total Weihrauch lattice fails to be a model of intuitionistic
linear logic in two different ways. In order to pinpoint the algebraic reasons
for this failure, we introduce the concept of a Weihrauch algebra that allows
us to formulate the failure in precise and neat terms. Finally, we show that
the Medvedev Brouwer algebra can be embedded into our Brouwer algebra, which
also implies that the theory of our Brouwer algebra is Jankov logic.Comment: 36 page
Half glass empty? politics & institutions in the liberalization of the fixed line telecommunications industry in Turkey
This chapter reviews Turkish experience with reform of the fixed line telecommunications industry. It provides an account of earlier incoherent attempts to privatize the incumbent operator in the absence of any regulatory framework or political consensus. It also describes the regulatory framework emerged in early 2000s and discusses the various political-economic and institutional factors behind its weak implementation, and hence its limited success in promoting competition
Current research on G\"odel's incompleteness theorems
We give a survey of current research on G\"{o}del's incompleteness theorems
from the following three aspects: classifications of different proofs of
G\"{o}del's incompleteness theorems, the limit of the applicability of
G\"{o}del's first incompleteness theorem, and the limit of the applicability of
G\"{o}del's second incompleteness theorem.Comment: 54 pages, final accepted version, to appear in The Bulletin of
Symbolic Logi
On the proof-theoretic strength of monotone induction in explicit mathematics
AbstractWe characterize the proof-theoretic strength of systems of explicit mathematics with a general principle (MID) asserting the existence of least fixed points for monotone inductive definitions, in terms of certain systems of analysis and set theory. In the case of analysis, these are systems which contain the Σ12-axiom of choice and Π12-comprehension for formulas without set parameters. In the case of set theory, these are systems containing the Kripke-Platek axioms for a recursively inaccessible universe together with the existence of a stable ordinal. In all cases, the exact strength depends on what forms of induction are admitted in the respective systems
Solutions to the Knower Paradox in the Light of Haack’s Criteria
The knower paradox states that the statement ‘We know that this statement is false’ leads to inconsistency. This article presents a fresh look at this paradox and some well-known solutions from the literature. Paul Égré discusses three possible solutions that modal provability logic provides for the paradox by surveying and comparing three different provability interpretations of modality, originally described by Skyrms, Anderson, and Solovay. In this article, some background is explained to clarify Égré’s solutions, all three of which hinge on intricacies of provability logic and its arithmetical interpretations. To check whether Égré’s solutions are satisfactory, we use the criteria for solutions to paradoxes defined by Susan Haack and we propose some refinements of them. This article aims to describe to what extent the knower paradox can be solved using provability logic and to what extent the solutions proposed in the literature satisfy Haack’s criteria. Finally, the article offers some reflections on the relation between knowledge, proof, and provability, as inspired by the knower paradox and its solutions.</p
Inference as doxastic agency. Part II: Ramifications and refinements
Justification stit logic is a logic for reasoning about proving as a certain kind of activity, namely seeing to it that a proof is publicly available. It merges the semantical analysis of deliberatively seeing-to-it-that from stit theory (Belnap, Perloff, Xu 2001) and the semantics of the epistemic logic with justification from (Artemov and Nogina 2005). In this paper, after recalling its language and basic semantical definitions, various ramifications and refinements of justification stit logic are presented and discussed: imposing natural restrictions upon the class of models under consideration, making use of modalities that assert the existence of a proof, introducing a variant of justification stit logic based on a semantics introduced by M. Fitting, and adding variable-binding operators and extending the set of proof polynomials
- …