26 research outputs found
Proving Craig and Lyndon Interpolation Using Labelled Sequent Calculi
We have recently presented a general method of proving the fundamental
logical properties of Craig and Lyndon Interpolation (IPs) by induction on
derivations in a wide class of internal sequent calculi, including sequents,
hypersequents, and nested sequents. Here we adapt the method to a more general
external formalism of labelled sequents and provide sufficient criteria on the
Kripke-frame characterization of a logic that guarantee the IPs. In particular,
we show that classes of frames definable by quantifier-free Horn formulas
correspond to logics with the IPs. These criteria capture the modal cube and
the infinite family of transitive Geach logics
Syntactic Interpolation for Tense Logics and Bi-Intuitionistic Logic via Nested Sequents
We provide a direct method for proving Craig interpolation for a range of modal and intuitionistic logics, including those containing a "converse" modality. We demonstrate this method for classical tense logic, its extensions with path axioms, and for bi-intuitionistic logic. These logics do not have straightforward formalisations in the traditional Gentzen-style sequent calculus, but have all been shown to have cut-free nested sequent calculi. The proof of the interpolation theorem uses these calculi and is purely syntactic, without resorting to embeddings, semantic arguments, or interpreted connectives external to the underlying logical language. A novel feature of our proof includes an orthogonality condition for defining duality between interpolants
Extensions of K5: Proof Theory and Uniform Lyndon Interpolation
We introduce a Gentzen-style framework, called layered sequent calculi, for
modal logic K5 and its extensions KD5, K45, KD45, KB5, and S5 with the goal to
investigate the uniform Lyndon interpolation property (ULIP), which implies
both the uniform interpolation property and the Lyndon interpolation property.
We obtain complexity-optimal decision procedures for all logics and present a
constructive proof of the ULIP for K5, which to the best of our knowledge, is
the first such syntactic proof. To prove that the interpolant is correct, we
use model-theoretic methods, especially bisimulation modulo literals.Comment: 20-page conference paper + 5-page appendix with examples and proof
Uniform interpolation via nested sequents
A modular proof-theoretic framework was recently developed to prove Craig interpolation for normal modal logics based on generalizations of sequent calculi (e.g., nested sequents, hypersequents, and labelled sequents). In this paper, we turn to uniform interpolation, which is stronger than Craig interpolation. We develop a constructive method for proving uniform interpolation via nested sequents and apply it to reprove the uniform interpolation property for normal modal logics K, D, and T. While our method is proof-theoretic, the definition of uniform interpolation for nested sequents also uses semantic notions, including bisimulation modulo an atomic proposition
Interpolation in Extensions of First-Order Logic
We prove a generalization of Maehara\u2019s lemma to show that the extensions
of classical and intuitionistic first-order logic with a special type of geometric axioms,
called singular geometric axioms, have Craig\u2019s interpolation property. As a corollary, we
obtain a direct proof of interpolation for (classical and intuitionistic) first-order logic with
identity, as well as interpolation for several mathematical theories, including the theory
of equivalence relations, (strict) partial and linear orders, and various intuitionistic order
theories such as apartness and positive partial and linear orders
Interpolation in extensions of first-order logic
We prove a generalization of Maehara's lemma to show that the extensions of
classical and intuitionistic first-order logic with a special type of geometric
axioms, called singular geometric axioms, have Craig's interpolation property.
As a corollary, we obtain a direct proof of interpolation for (classical and
intuitionistic) first-order logic with identity, as well as interpolation for
several mathematical theories, including the theory of equivalence relations,
(strict) partial and linear orders, and various intuitionistic order theories
such as apartness and positive partial and linear orders.Comment: In this up-dated version of the paper a more general notion of
singular geometric theory is provided allowing the extension of our
interpolation results to further fundamental mathematical theorie
Hypersequent calculi for non-normal modal and deontic logics: Countermodels and optimal complexity
We present some hypersequent calculi for all systems of the classical cube
and their extensions with axioms , , , and, for every , rule
. The calculi are internal as they only employ the language of the
logic, plus additional structural connectives. We show that the calculi are
complete with respect to the corresponding axiomatisation by a syntactic proof
of cut elimination. Then we define a terminating root-first proof search
strategy based on the hypersequent calculi and show that it is optimal for
coNP-complete logics. Moreover, we obtain that from every saturated leaf of a
failed proof it is possible to define a countermodel of the root hypersequent
in the bi-neighbourhood semantics, and for regular logics also in the
relational semantics. We finish the paper by giving a translation between
hypersequent rule applications and derivations in a labelled system for the
classical cube
Proof-theoretic Semantics for Intuitionistic Multiplicative Linear Logic
This work is the first exploration of proof-theoretic semantics for a substructural logic. It focuses on the base-extension semantics (B-eS) for intuitionistic multiplicative linear logic (IMLL). The starting point is a review of Sandqvist’s B-eS for intuitionistic propositional logic (IPL), for which we propose an alternative treatment of conjunction that takes the form of the generalized elimination rule for the connective. The resulting semantics is shown to be sound and complete. This motivates our main contribution, a B-eS for IMLL
, in which the definitions of the logical constants all take the form of their elimination rule and for which soundness and completeness are established