Trends and concerns in digital cartography

CISRG discussion paper ;

Techniques for augmenting the visualisation of dynamic raster surfaces

Despite their aesthetic appeal and condensed nature, dynamic raster surface representations such as a temporal series of a landform and an attribute series of a socio-economic attribute of an area, are often criticised for the lack of an effective information delivery and interactivity.In this work, we readdress some of the earlier raised reasons for these limitations -information-laden quality of surface datasets, lack of spatial and temporal continuity in the original data, and a limited scope for a real-time interactivity. We demonstrate with examples that the use of four techniques namely the re-expression of the surfaces as a framework of morphometric features, spatial generalisation, morphing, graphic lag and brushing can augment the visualisation of dynamic raster surfaces in temporal and attribute series

Visualisation, VISC and scientific insight

CISRG discussion paper ;

Algorithms for sketching surfaces

CISRG discussion paper ; 1

Cartography, geographical information systems and maps in perspective

CISRG discussion paper ;

The Douglas-Peucker algorithm for line simplification : re-evaluation through visualisation

CISRG discussion paper ;

Approximation, generalisation and deconstruction of planar curves

CISRG discussion paper ; 1

The Douglas-Peucker algorithm for line simplification: Re-evaluation through visualization

The primary aim of this paper is to illustrate the value of visualization in cartography and to indicate that tools for the generation and manipulation of realistic images are of limited value within this application. This paper demonstrates the value of visualization within one problem in cartography, namely the generalisation of lines. It reports on the evaluation of the Douglas-Peucker algorithm for line simplification. Visualization of the simplification process and of the results suggest that the mathematical measures of performance proposed by some other researchers are inappropriate, misleading and questionable