Hierarchical incremental class learning with reduced pattern training

Hierarchical Incremental Class Learning (HICL) is a new task decomposition method that addresses the pattern classification problem. HICL is proven to be a good classifier but closer examination reveals areas for potential improvement. This paper proposes a theoretical model to evaluate the performance of HICL and presents an approach to improve the classification accuracy of HICL by applying the concept of Reduced Pattern Training (RPT). The theoretical analysis shows that HICL can achieve better classification accuracy than Output Parallelism [1]. The procedure for RPT is described and compared with the original training procedure. RPT reduces systematically the size of the training data set based on the order of sub-networks built. The results from four benchmark classification problems show much promise for the improved model

Reduced pattern training based on task decomposition using pattern distributor

Task Decomposition with Pattern Distributor (PD) is a new task decomposition method for multilayered feedforward neural networks. Pattern distributor network is proposed that implements this new task decomposition method. We propose a theoretical model to analyze the performance of pattern distributor network. A method named Reduced Pattern Training is also introduced, aiming to improve the performance of pattern distribution. Our analysis and the experimental results show that reduced pattern training improves the performance of pattern distributor network significantly. The distributor module’s classification accuracy dominates the whole network’s performance. Two combination methods, namely Cross-talk based combination and Genetic Algorithm based combination, are presented to find suitable grouping for the distributor module. Experimental results show that this new method can reduce training time and improve network generalization accuracy when compared to a conventional method such as constructive backpropagation or a task decomposition method such as Output Parallelism

Multi-learner based recursive supervised training

In this paper, we propose the Multi-Learner Based Recursive Supervised Training (MLRT) algorithm which uses the existing framework of recursive task decomposition, by training the entire dataset, picking out the best learnt patterns, and then repeating the process with the remaining patterns. Instead of having a single learner to classify all datasets during each recursion, an appropriate learner is chosen from a set of three learners, based on the subset of data being trained, thereby avoiding the time overhead associated with the genetic algorithm learner utilized in previous approaches. In this way MLRT seeks to identify the inherent characteristics of the dataset, and utilize it to train the data accurately and efficiently. We observed that empirically, MLRT performs considerably well as compared to RPHP and other systems on benchmark data with 11% improvement in accuracy on the SPAM dataset and comparable performances on the VOWEL and the TWO-SPIRAL problems. In addition, for most datasets, the time taken by MLRT is considerably lower than the other systems with comparable accuracy. Two heuristic versions, MLRT-2 and MLRT-3 are also introduced to improve the efficiency in the system, and to make it more scalable for future updates. The performance in these versions is similar to the original MLRT system

Task decomposition using pattern distributor

In this paper, we propose a new task decomposition method for multilayered feedforward neural networks, namely Task Decomposition with Pattern Distributor in order to shorten the training time and improve the generalization accuracy of a network under training. This new method uses the combination of modules (small-size feedforward network) in parallel and series, to produce the overall solution for a complex problem. Based on a “divide-and-conquer” technique, the original problem is decomposed into several simpler sub-problems by a pattern distributor module in the network, where each sub-problem is composed of the whole input vector and a fraction of the output vector of the original problem. These sub-problems are then solved by the corresponding groups of modules, where each group of modules is connected in series with the pattern distributor module and the modules in each group are connected in parallel. The design details and implementation of this new method are introduced in this paper. Several benchmark classification problems are used to test this new method. The analysis and experimental results show that this new method could reduce training time and improve generalization accuracy

Parallel symbolic state-space exploration is difficult, but what is the alternative?

State-space exploration is an essential step in many modeling and analysis problems. Its goal is to find the states reachable from the initial state of a discrete-state model described. The state space can used to answer important questions, e.g., "Is there a dead state?" and "Can N become negative?", or as a starting point for sophisticated investigations expressed in temporal logic. Unfortunately, the state space is often so large that ordinary explicit data structures and sequential algorithms cannot cope, prompting the exploration of (1) parallel approaches using multiple processors, from simple workstation networks to shared-memory supercomputers, to satisfy large memory and runtime requirements and (2) symbolic approaches using decision diagrams to encode the large structured sets and relations manipulated during state-space generation. Both approaches have merits and limitations. Parallel explicit state-space generation is challenging, but almost linear speedup can be achieved; however, the analysis is ultimately limited by the memory and processors available. Symbolic methods are a heuristic that can efficiently encode many, but not all, functions over a structured and exponentially large domain; here the pitfalls are subtler: their performance varies widely depending on the class of decision diagram chosen, the state variable order, and obscure algorithmic parameters. As symbolic approaches are often much more efficient than explicit ones for many practical models, we argue for the need to parallelize symbolic state-space generation algorithms, so that we can realize the advantage of both approaches. This is a challenging endeavor, as the most efficient symbolic algorithm, Saturation, is inherently sequential. We conclude by discussing challenges, efforts, and promising directions toward this goal

Executing matrix multiply on a process oriented data flow machine

The Process-Oriented Dataflow System (PODS) is an execution model that combines the von Neumann and dataflow models of computation to gain the benefits of each. Central to PODS is the concept of array distribution and its effects on partitioning and mapping of processes.In PODS arrays are partitioned by simply assigning consecutive elements to each processing element (PE) equally. Since PODS uses single assignment, there will be only one producer of each element. This producing PE owns that element and will perform the necessary computations to assign it. Using this approach the filling loop is distributed across the PEs. This simple partitioning and mapping scheme provides excellent results for executing scientific code on MIMD machines. In this way PODS allows MIMD machines to exploit vector and data parallelism easily while still providing the flexibility of MIMD over SIMD for multi-user systems.In this paper, the classic matrix multiply algorithm, with 1024 data points, is executed on a PODS simulator and the results are presented and discussed. Matrix multiply is a good example because it has several interesting properties: there are multiple code-blocks; a new array must be dynamically allocated and distributed; there is a loop-carried dependency in the innermost loop; the two input arrays have different access patterns; and the sizes of the input arrays are not known at compile time. Matrix multiply also forms the basis for many important scientific algorithms such as: LU decomposition, convolution, and the Fast-Fourier Transform.The results show that PODS is comparable to both Iannucci's Hybrid Architecture and MIT's TTDA in terms of overhead and instruction power. They also show that PODS easily distributes the work load evenly across the PEs. The key result is that PODS can scale matrix multiply in a near linear fashion until there is little or no work to be performed for each PE. Then overhead and message passing become a major component of the execution time. With larger problems (e.g., >/=16k data points) this limit would be reached at around 256 PEs