703 research outputs found

    Management and Administration

    Get PDF
    According to Peter F. Drucker (1909–2005), a revered and prolific writer in the field, “management pertains to every human effort that brings together in one organization people of diverse knowledge and skills.” Managers in both the forprofit and nonprofit arenas share similar responsibilities, he wrote, “among them defining the right strategies and goals, developing people, measuring performance, and marketing the organization’s services.” (The Essential Drucker: The Best of Sixty Years of Peter Drucker’s Essential Writings on Management. New York: HarperCollins, 2001, pp. 7–8.) Planning, organizing, leading, directing, and controlling are functions traditionally ascribed to management, but the field comprises numerous subdisciplines, including management science, organization studies, strategic planning, decision-making, leadership studies, human resource management, cross-cultural and international management, quality management, supply chain management, knowledge management, logistics management, crisis management, product innovation management, management communication, management research, manufacturing and service operations management, and project management. The selection of management journals and magazines discussed in this section include scholarly, peer-reviewed sources as well as publications intended for practitioners and general readers. They offer a mix of theoretical articles, empirical research reports and pragmatic advice, and article summaries and book reviews that can be easily processed by busy professionals. Most of the publications are now available in both print and online formats, and ISSNs for both are included in the annotations when this is the case. Many journals also offer open-access options to authors, who for an additional fee can make their articles available online to both subscribers and non-subscribers of the journal. Early publication online options are also common, under which the version of record of an article is posted online before appearing in a journal issue

    Subscribed Journal Usage 2007

    Get PDF
    Report from the Digital Services Department at the University of New England Libraries for 2007-2008, submitted in support of program review

    A model-driven method for the systematic literature review of qualitative empirical research

    Get PDF
    This paper explores a model-driven method for systematic literature reviews (SLRs), for use where the empirical studies found in the literature search are based on qualitative research. SLRs are an important component of the evidence-based practice (EBP) paradigm, which is receiving increasing attention in information systems (IS) but has not yet been widely-adopted. We illustrate the model-driven approach to SLRs via an example focused on the use of BPMN (Business Process Modelling Notation) in organizations. We discuss in detail the process followed in using the model-driven SLR method, and show how it is based on a hermeneutic cycle of reading and interpreting, in order to develop and refine a model which synthesizes the research findings of previous qualitative studies. This study can serve as an exemplar for other researchers wishing to carry out model-driven SLRs. We conclude with our reflections on the method and some suggestions for further researc

    Eesti MaaĂŒlikoolile avatud andmebaaside kasutamise statistika perioodil 01. jaanuar 2018 – 31. mai 2018

    Get PDF
    TĂ€istekstKĂ€esolev aruanne on koostatud COUNTER statistikale tuginedes. COUNTER Code of Practice on standard, mille alusel kogutakse statistikat elektrooniliste ressursside kasutamise kohta (Dunkley, s.a). COUNTER on mĂ”eldud raamatukogudele ning andmebaaside, platvormide ja/vĂ”i ajakirjadega seotud olevatele teenusepakkujatele (nĂ€iteks kirjastajad), kes vajavad usaldusvÀÀrset kasutajastatistika ĂŒlevaadet. Kui vaadata teemat raamatukogu vaatevinklist, siis kĂ”ige lihtsamalt öeldes hĂ”lbustab COUNTER raamatukogudel elektroonilise kasutustatistika registreerimist, vahendamist ja tĂ”lgendamist. Kasutusstatistikat saab rahvusvahelisel tasandil koguda ajakirjade, andmebaaside (sh multimeediaandmebaaside), raamatute ja teatmeteoste kohta ning vĂ€ljastatud statistikaaruanded on jĂ€rjepidavad, usaldusvÀÀrsed ja ĂŒksteisega ĂŒhilduvad. Raamatukogud saavad nende andmetele tuginedes oma tegevust paremini planeerida, nĂ€iteks teha kaalutletumaid ostuotsuseid. Samade andmete pĂ”hjal saavad oma tegevust organiseerida ka need, kes raamatukogudele oma teenuseid pakuvad (General Information, s.a; Usage Reports s.a). Peaaegu kĂ”igis EMÜ andmebaasides oli vĂ”imalik tellida COUNTER statistikat ning tundub, et see on andmebaaside enda sĂŒsteemid tahaplaanile lĂŒkanud. COUNTER on hea vahend, sest vĂ”imaldab saada kĂ”ikide andmebaaside kohta sarnast informatsiooni, mis omakorda aitab kogutud andmeid vĂ”rreldavamasse konteksti paigutada. Statistikaaruannet tellides saab valida konkreetse ajaperioodi, mille kohta andmeid soovitakse saada (General Information, s.a; Usage Reports s.a). KĂ€esolevas aruandes on esitatud ainult osa kogutud andmetest. Perioodiks on 01.01.2018 – 31.05.2018. Vajadusel on vĂ”imalik lisaandmeid juurde vaadata Exceli failist. NĂ€iteks on tabelites vĂ€lja toodud Top 3 ajakirjad/raamatud, Exceli failis aga Top 10. Vajadusel on vĂ”imalik tutvuda ka tĂ€ielike nimekirjadega. Nende kohta on minu arvutis eraldi kaustad COUNTER algfailidega. Hetkel on aruandest puudu andmebaasi EBSCO ja ajakirja JAAHA andmed, mis on mĂ”lemad riigihankega tellitud. Lisaks puuduvad andmed jĂ€rgmiste andmebaaside/ajakirjade kohta: Wiley, Top Agrar Ausgabe S-R, TTJ

    ACRL New England Serials and Electronic Resources Interest Group Summer Program: Current Trends in E-Journals

    Get PDF
    This report covers a workshop held by the Serials and Electronic Resources Interest Group (SERIG) of the Association of College and Research Libraries New England Chapter, an independent chapter of ACRL. The program titled Current Trends in E-Journals was held on Thursday, August 18, 2011 at the Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences in Boston

    The Relevance of Benjamin Franklin\u27s and Thomas Jefferson\u27s Technical Writing for Modern Communicators

    Get PDF
    Today\u27s technical communicators enjoy an increasingly broader role and influence in the workplace, and are often given latitude to use engaging rhetoric and personal touches in many kinds of communications. Historical documents, particularly those that are substantially removed from our own era, can offer fresh approaches and insight into the enduring elements of successful communication. This study explores the technical writings of Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson and considers their usefulness to professionals today. Although the political writing of Franklin and Jefferson is more familiar, both men frequently wrote about scientific and technical subjects and were well-known in their day for these documents. Franklin created a captivating persona and arguments which carried emotional and logical appeal. Jefferson was a student of ancient rhetoric and applied classical principles of arrangement to guide readers. His fondness for statistical records led to a skill in presenting numerical data and other types of information in creative, efficient ways. By using tone, language, and description, both Franklin and Jefferson created technical narratives that are equally informative and aesthetically pleasing. The contemporary era of technical communication has been shaped by positivism, the plain language movement, and humanism, among other significant trends. Franklin\u27s and Jefferson\u27s approaches to technical communication both support and challenge the guiding philosophies of these movements. Their styles are reviewed in this study against the context of modern approaches. Opportunities for further historical study are also offered, including additional writings of our Founding Fathers and technical writing from the turn of the twentieth century

    A Model-Driven Method for the Systematic Literature Review of Qualitative Empirical Research

    Get PDF
    This paper explores a new model-driven method for systematic literature reviews (SLRs), for use where the empirical studies found in the literature search are based on qualitative research. SLRs are an important component of the evidence-based practice (EBP) paradigm, which is receiving increasing attention in information systems (IS) but has not yet been widely-adopted. We illustrate the model-driven approach to SLRs via an example focused on the use of BPMN (Business Process Modelling Notation) in organizations. We discuss in detail the process followed in using the model-driven SLR method, and show how it is based on a hermeneutic cycle of reading and interpreting, in order to develop and refine a model which synthesizes the research findings of qualitative studies. This study can serve as an exemplar for other researchers wishing to carry out model-driven SLRs. We conclude with our reflections on the method and some suggestions for further research

    Trophonema arenarium (Nematoda: Tylenchulidae) and its junior synonyms.

    Get PDF
    Peer reviewe
    • 

    corecore