Applying Formal Methods to Networking: Theory, Techniques and Applications

Despite its great importance, modern network infrastructure is remarkable for the lack of rigor in its engineering. The Internet which began as a research experiment was never designed to handle the users and applications it hosts today. The lack of formalization of the Internet architecture meant limited abstractions and modularity, especially for the control and management planes, thus requiring for every new need a new protocol built from scratch. This led to an unwieldy ossified Internet architecture resistant to any attempts at formal verification, and an Internet culture where expediency and pragmatism are favored over formal correctness. Fortunately, recent work in the space of clean slate Internet design---especially, the software defined networking (SDN) paradigm---offers the Internet community another chance to develop the right kind of architecture and abstractions. This has also led to a great resurgence in interest of applying formal methods to specification, verification, and synthesis of networking protocols and applications. In this paper, we present a self-contained tutorial of the formidable amount of work that has been done in formal methods, and present a survey of its applications to networking.Comment: 30 pages, submitted to IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorial

Applied Formal Methods in Wireless Sensor Networks

This work covers the application of formal methods to the world of wireless sensor networks. Mainly two different perspectives are analyzed through mathematical models which can be distinct for example into qualitative statements like "Is the system error free?" From the perspective of quantitative propositions we investigate protocol optimal parameter settings for an energy efficient operation

Formal Verification of a MESI-based Cache Implementation

Cache coherency is crucial to multi-core systems with a shared memory programming model. Coherency protocols have been formally verified at the architectural level with relative ease. However, several subtle issues creep into the hardware realization of cache in a multi-processor environment. The assumption, made in the abstract model, that state transitions are atomic, is invalid for the HDL implementation. Each transition is composed of many concurrent multi-core operations. As a result, even with a blocking bus, several transient states come into existence. Most modern processors optimize communication with a split-transaction bus, this results in further transient states and race conditions. Therefore, the design and verification of cache coherency is increasingly complex and challenging. Simulation techniques are insufficient to ensure memory consistency and the absence of deadlock, livelock, and starvation. At best, it is tediously complex and time consuming to reach confidence in functionality with simulation. Formal methods are ideally suited to identify the numerous race conditions and subtle failures. In this study, we perform formal property verification on the RTL of a multi-core level-1 cache design based on snooping MESI protocol. We demonstrate full-proof verification of the coherence module in JasperGold using complexity reduction techniques through parameterization. We verify that the assumptions needed to constrain inputs of the stand-alone cache coherence module are satisfied as valid assertions in the instantiation environment. We compare results obtained from formal property verification against a state-of-the-art UVM environment. We highlight the benefits of a synergistic collaboration between simulation and formal techniques. We present formal analysis as a generic toolkit with numerous usage models in the digital design process

Deconstructing the Blockchain to Approach Physical Limits

Transaction throughput, confirmation latency and confirmation reliability are fundamental performance measures of any blockchain system in addition to its security. In a decentralized setting, these measures are limited by two underlying physical network attributes: communication capacity and speed-of-light propagation delay. Existing systems operate far away from these physical limits. In this work we introduce Prism, a new proof-of-work blockchain protocol, which can achieve 1) security against up to 50% adversarial hashing power; 2) optimal throughput up to the capacity C of the network; 3) confirmation latency for honest transactions proportional to the propagation delay D, with confirmation error probability exponentially small in CD ; 4) eventual total ordering of all transactions. Our approach to the design of this protocol is based on deconstructing the blockchain into its basic functionalities and systematically scaling up these functionalities to approach their physical limits.Comment: Computer and Communications Security, 201

Towards Certified Model Checking for PLTL using One-pass Tableaux

The standard model checking setup analyses whether the given system specification satisfies a dedicated temporal property of the system, providing a positive answer here or a counter-example. At the same time, it is often useful to have an explicit proof that certifies the satisfiability. This is exactly what the {\it certified model checking (CMC)} has been introduced for. The paper argues that one-pass (context-based) tableau for PLTL can be efficiently used in the CMC setting, emphasising the following two advantages of this technique. First, the use of the context in which the eventualities occur, forces them to fulfil as soon as possible. Second, a dual to the tableau sequent calculus can be used to formalise the certificates. The combination of the one-pass tableau and the dual sequent calculus enables us to provide not only counter-examples for unsatisfied properties, but also proofs for satisfied properties that can be checked in a proof assistant. In addition, the construction of the tableau is enriched by an embedded solver, to which we dedicate those (propositional) computational tasks that are costly for the tableaux rules applied solely. The combination of the above techniques is particularly helpful to reason about large (system) specifications