Prediction of surface roughness in low speed turning of AISI316 austenitic stainless steel

Surface roughness is an important quality in manufacturing, as it affects the product’s tribological, frictional and assembly characteristics. Turning stainless steel at low cutting speeds may result in a rougher surface due to built up edge formation, where as speed increases the surface roughness improves, due to the low contact time between the chip and the tool to allow bonding to occur.However, this increase in cutting speed produces higher tool wear rates, which increases the machining costs. Previous studies have indicated that savings in cost and manufacturing time are obtained when predicting the surface roughness, prior to the machining process. In this paper, experimental data are used to develop prediction models using Multiple Linear Regression and Artificial Neural Network methodologies. Results show that the neural network outperforms the linear model by a fair margin (1400%). Moreover, the developed Artificial Neural Network model has been integrated with an optimisation algorithm, known as Simulated Annealing (SA),this is done in order to obtain a set of cutting parameters that result in low surface roughness. A low value of surface roughness and the set of parameters resulting on it, are successfully yielded by the SA algorithm

State-of-the-art in aerodynamic shape optimisation methods

Aerodynamic optimisation has become an indispensable component for any aerodynamic design over the past 60 years, with applications to aircraft, cars, trains, bridges, wind turbines, internal pipe flows, and cavities, among others, and is thus relevant in many facets of technology. With advancements in computational power, automated design optimisation procedures have become more competent, however, there is an ambiguity and bias throughout the literature with regards to relative performance of optimisation architectures and employed algorithms. This paper provides a well-balanced critical review of the dominant optimisation approaches that have been integrated with aerodynamic theory for the purpose of shape optimisation. A total of 229 papers, published in more than 120 journals and conference proceedings, have been classified into 6 different optimisation algorithm approaches. The material cited includes some of the most well-established authors and publications in the field of aerodynamic optimisation. This paper aims to eliminate bias toward certain algorithms by analysing the limitations, drawbacks, and the benefits of the most utilised optimisation approaches. This review provides comprehensive but straightforward insight for non-specialists and reference detailing the current state for specialist practitioners

Simulated annealing coupled with a Naïve Bayes model and base flow separation for streamflow simulation in a snow dominated basin

Streamflow simulation in a snow dominated basin is complex due to the presence of a high number of interrelated hydrological processes. This complexity is affected by the delayed responses of the catchment to snow accumulation and snow melting processes. In this study, long short-term memory (LSTM) and artificial neural network (ANN) models were utilized for rainfall–runoff simulation in a snow dominated basin, the Carson River basin in the United States (US). The input structure of the models was determined using the simulated annealing algorithm with a naïve Bayes model from a high dimensional feature space to represent the long-term impacts of historical events (i.e. the hysteresis effect) on current observations. Further, to represent the different responses of the catchment in the model structure, a base flow separation method was included in the simulation framework. The obtained performance indices, root mean square error, percentage bias, Nash–Sutcliffe and Kling–Gupta efficiencies are 0.331 m3 s−1, 13.00%, 0.848, and 0.852 for the ANN model and 0.235 m3 s−1, − 0.80%, 0.923, and 0.934 for the LSTM model, respectively. The proposed methodology was found to be promising for improving the streamflow simulation capability of LSTM and ANN models by only considering precipitation, temperature, and potential evapotranspiration as input variables. Analysing the flow duration curves indicated that the LSTM model is more efficient in representing different flow dynamics within the basin due to embedded cell states. Further, the uncertainty and reliability analyses were conducted by using expanded uncertainty (U95), reliability, and resilience indices. The obtained U95, reliability and resilience indices are 1.78–1.72 m3 s−1, 31.28–66.67% and 11.58–38.27% for the ANN and LSTM models, respectively, showed that the LSTM model produced less uncertainty and is more reliable. However, while lacking a memory component, the proposed methodology significantly contributes to the simulation capability of the ANN model in rainfall–runoff modelling. The results of this study indicated that the proposed methodology could enhance the learning capabilities of machine learning models in rainfall–runoff simulation.</p

A comprehensive literature classification of simulation optimisation methods

Simulation Optimization (SO) provides a structured approach to the system design and configuration when analytical expressions for input/output relationships are unavailable. Several excellent surveys have been written on this topic. Each survey concentrates on only few classification criteria. This paper presents a literature survey with all classification criteria on techniques for SO according to the problem of characteristics such as shape of the response surface (global as compared to local optimization), objective functions (single or multiple objectives) and parameter spaces (discrete or continuous parameters). The survey focuses specifically on the SO problem that involves single per-formance measureSimulation Optimization, classification methods, literature survey