10,609 research outputs found
Tight Approximation Algorithms for Scheduling with Fixed Jobs and Non-Availability
We study two closely related problems in non-preemptive scheduling of sequential jobs on identical parallel machines. In these two settings there are either fixed jobs or non-availability intervals during which the machines are not available; in both cases, the objective is to minimize the makespan. Both formulations have different applications, e.g. in turnaround scheduling or overlay computing. For both problems we contribute approximation algorithms with an improved ratio of , respectively, which we refine to approximation algorithms with ratio . For scheduling with fixed jobs, a lower bound of on the approximation ratio has been obtained by Scharbrodt, Steger & Weisser: for scheduling with non-availability we provide the same lower bound. In total, our approximation ratio for both problems is tight via suitable inapproximability results. We use dual approximation, creation of a gap structure and job configurations, and a PTAS for the multiple subset sum problem. However, the main feature of our algorithms is a new technique for the assignment of large jobs via flexible rounding. Our new technique is based on an interesting cyclic shifting argument in combination with a network flow model for the assignment of jobs to large gaps
Tight Approximation Algorithms for Scheduling with Fixed Jobs and Non-Availability
We study two closely related problems in non-preemptive scheduling of jobs on identical parallel machines. In these two settings there are either fixed jobs or non-availability intervals during which the machines are not available; in both cases, the objective is to minimize the makespan. Both formulations have different applications, e.g. in turnaround scheduling or overlay computing. For both problems we contribute approximation algorithms with an improved ratio of 3/2. For scheduling with fixed jobs, a lower bound of 3/2 on the approximation ratio has been obtained by Scharbrodt, Steger & Weisser; for scheduling with non-availability we provide the same lower bound. We use dual approximation, creation of a gap structure and a PTAS for the multiple subset sum problem, combined with a post- processing step to assign large job
Parameterized complexity of machine scheduling: 15 open problems
Machine scheduling problems are a long-time key domain of algorithms and
complexity research. A novel approach to machine scheduling problems are
fixed-parameter algorithms. To stimulate this thriving research direction, we
propose 15 open questions in this area whose resolution we expect to lead to
the discovery of new approaches and techniques both in scheduling and
parameterized complexity theory.Comment: Version accepted to Computers & Operations Researc
Stochastic scheduling on unrelated machines
Two important characteristics encountered in many real-world scheduling problems are heterogeneous machines/processors and a certain degree of uncertainty about the actual sizes of jobs. The first characteristic entails machine dependent processing times of jobs and is captured by the classical unrelated machine scheduling model.The second characteristic is adequately addressed by stochastic processing times of jobs as they are studied in classical stochastic scheduling models. While there is an extensive but separate literature for the two scheduling models, we study for the first time a combined model that takes both characteristics into account simultaneously. Here, the processing time of job on machine is governed by random variable , and its actual realization becomes known only upon job completion. With being the given weight of job , we study the classical objective to minimize the expected total weighted completion time , where is the completion time of job . By means of a novel time-indexed linear programming relaxation, we compute in polynomial time a scheduling policy with performance guarantee . Here, is arbitrarily small, and is an upper bound on the squared coefficient of variation of the processing times. We show that the dependence of the performance guarantee on is tight, as we obtain a lower bound for the type of policies that we use. When jobs also have individual release dates , our bound is . Via , currently best known bounds for deterministic scheduling are contained as a special case
Competitive-Ratio Approximation Schemes for Minimizing the Makespan in the Online-List Model
We consider online scheduling on multiple machines for jobs arriving
one-by-one with the objective of minimizing the makespan. For any number of
identical parallel or uniformly related machines, we provide a
competitive-ratio approximation scheme that computes an online algorithm whose
competitive ratio is arbitrarily close to the best possible competitive ratio.
We also determine this value up to any desired accuracy. This is the first
application of competitive-ratio approximation schemes in the online-list
model. The result proves the applicability of the concept in different online
models. We expect that it fosters further research on other online problems
Throughput Maximization in Multiprocessor Speed-Scaling
We are given a set of jobs that have to be executed on a set of
speed-scalable machines that can vary their speeds dynamically using the energy
model introduced in [Yao et al., FOCS'95]. Every job is characterized by
its release date , its deadline , its processing volume if
is executed on machine and its weight . We are also given a budget
of energy and our objective is to maximize the weighted throughput, i.e.
the total weight of jobs that are completed between their respective release
dates and deadlines. We propose a polynomial-time approximation algorithm where
the preemption of the jobs is allowed but not their migration. Our algorithm
uses a primal-dual approach on a linearized version of a convex program with
linear constraints. Furthermore, we present two optimal algorithms for the
non-preemptive case where the number of machines is bounded by a fixed
constant. More specifically, we consider: {\em (a)} the case of identical
processing volumes, i.e. for every and , for which we
present a polynomial-time algorithm for the unweighted version, which becomes a
pseudopolynomial-time algorithm for the weighted throughput version, and {\em
(b)} the case of agreeable instances, i.e. for which if and only
if , for which we present a pseudopolynomial-time algorithm. Both
algorithms are based on a discretization of the problem and the use of dynamic
programming
- …