Toward incremental FIB aggregation with quick selections (FAQS)

Several approaches to mitigating the Forwarding Information Base (FIB) overflow problem were developed and software solutions using FIB aggregation are of particular interest. One of the greatest concerns to deploy these algorithms to real networks is their high running time and heavy computational overhead to handle thousands of FIB updates every second. In this work, we manage to use a single tree traversal to implement faster aggregation and update handling algorithm with much lower memory footprint than other existing work. We utilize 6-year realistic IPv4 and IPv6 routing tables from 2011 to 2016 to evaluate the performance of our algorithm with various metrics. To the best of our knowledge, it is the first time that IPv6 FIB aggregation has been performed. Our new solution is 2.53 and 1.75 times as fast as the-state-of-the-art FIB aggregation algorithm for IPv4 and IPv6 FIBs, respectively, while achieving a near-optimal FIB aggregation ratio

Ipv6 Migration Framework For Government Agencies In Malaysia

Malaysia adalah sebahagian daripada negara-negara dunia yang berusaha untuk berhijrah ke protokol Internet Versi 6 (lPv6) Malaysia is involved in the worldwide effort to migrate to IPv6 due to the giobal IPv4 address depletion and other IPv4 limitations as well as to derive IPv6 benefits

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SECURELY CONNECTING HETEROGENEOUS L3 NETWORK WITH SDWAN

At present, there are different methods and systems for connecting L3 heterogenous data networks. Current software-defined wide area network (SDWAN) solutions provide a secure way of interconnecting branches or data centers with various deployment models. However, existing solutions do not allow for connecting Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6)-only networks to Internet Protocol version 4 (IPv4)-only networks. Presented herein are techniques for providing an efficient and secure way of connecting IPv4-only branches with IPv6-only branches and vice versa. In one instance, techniques presented herein provide for connecting an IPv4-only branch with an IPv6-only branch when the controller is located in the IPv6-only network. In another instance, techniques presented herein provide for connecting an IPv4-only branch with an IPv6-only branch when the controller is located in the IPv4-only network

Perbandingan Ipv4 Dan Ipv6 Dalam Membangun Jaringan Local Area Network (Lan)

IP address is also called the identification codes, the computer on the network / internet, each every computer which incircuit to network have to own a IP address in each interface and IP address by self have to be unique because there may not be any computer using same IP address. IPv4 which is equal to 32 bit will difficult to obtain in the future, therefore needed a new development of the IP address, Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6), known as Internet Protocol Next Generation (IPNG). IPng is a new third layer protocol designed to replace IPv4. The author attempt a comparative study using IPv4 and IPv6 in building a Local Area Network (LAN). This study is expected to be helpful for the users who will make the transition from IPv4 to IPv6

IPv6 TO IPv4 TUNNEL

In Networking Internet Protocol (IP) is the most important factor. Ip has basically two version IPv4 and IPv6.In day today life IPv4 address rang are get empty, so we use Ipv6 address rang. But IPv4 and IPV6 cannot communicate directly due to this reason we have use or implement tunneling mechanism. IPv6-IPv4 tunnel is used to achieve direct communication between IPv4 network and IPv6 network. In general ipv4 network do not configure with directly ipv6 network, so we have do tunneling configuration. Translation happens on the IPv4-IPv6 border, so the translator would be an AFBR (Address Family Border Router).For this project we have to use GNS3 software. By using this software all configurations we have to done and at the output we have to show dada transfer from live pc to different system desktop. Live Pc and another desktop configure with IPv6 address configuration and tunnel creates in IPv4 network by use in RIP routing Protocol and IPv6 configure with OSPF rounting protocol. Data transfer can show by using http web server and wireshark software. By using this project we have to easily communication with two different networks i.e. Internet protocol version 6 can easily communicate with internet protocol version 4

Analisis Perbandingan Penerapan Static Routing pada Ipv4 dan Ipv6

Static routing is a Router that has a static routing table that is configured manually by network administrators. Static routing is the simplest routing setting that can be done on a computer network. IP Addresss version 6 is the latest version in Internet protocol based computer networking protocol, which was created to provide solutions to the main problems in IPv4, namely the limitation of addressing capacity. IPv4 is only able to reach as many as 4 octets with each octet maximum of 255 pieces of computer in it, so it can be said that for all computers currently able to handle numbers of 4 billion. In IPv6 there are 16 Octet with one octet capable of loading maximum 255 pieces of computers and other connected devices that can be accommodated is about 3.4 trillion. Therefore the authors will conduct a comparison study analysis of the use of IPv4 and IPv6 to see the performance of both in the implementation of static routing, parameters in the test Throughput, Delay and Packet loss. Keywords: IPv4, IPv6, Static Routing

Case Study - IPv6 based building automation solution integration into an IPv4 Network Service Provider infrastructure

The case study presents a case study describing an Internet Protocol (IP) version 6 (v6) introduction to an IPv4 Internet Service Provider (ISP) network infrastructure. The case study driver is an ISP willing to introduce a new “killer” service related to Internet of Things (IoT) style building automation. The provider and cooperation of third party companies specialized in building automation will provide the service. The ISP has to deliver the network access layer and to accommodate the building automation solution traffic throughout its network infrastructure. The third party companies are system integrators and building automation solution vendors. IPv6 is suitable for such solutions due to the following reasons. The operator can’t accommodate large number of IPv4 embedded devices in its current network due to the lack of address space and the fact that many of those will need clear 2 way IP communication channel. The Authors propose a strategy for IPv6 introduction into operator infrastructure based on the current network architecture present service portfolio and several transition mechanisms. The strategy has been applied in laboratory with setup close enough to the current operator’s network. The criterion for a successful experiment is full two-way IPv6 application layer connectivity between the IPv6 server and the IPv6 Internet of Things (IoT) cloud