3,312 research outputs found
Topological Semantics and Decidability
It is well-known that the basic modal logic of all topological spaces is
. However, the structure of basic modal and hybrid logics of classes of
spaces satisfying various separation axioms was until present unclear. We prove
that modal logics of , and topological spaces coincide and are
S4T_1 spaces coincide.Comment: presentation changes, results about concrete structure adde
Topological Semantics and Decidability
It is well-known that the basic modal logic of all topological spaces is . However, the structure of basic modal and hybrid logics of classes of spaces satisfying various separation axioms was until present unclear. We prove that modal logics of , and topological spaces coincide and are S4T_1 spaces coincide
Internal Calculi for Separation Logics
We present a general approach to axiomatise separation logics with heaplet semantics with no external features such as nominals/labels. To start with, we design the first (internal) Hilbert-style axiomatisation for the quantifier-free separation logic SL(?, -*). We instantiate the method by introducing a new separation logic with essential features: it is equipped with the separating conjunction, the predicate ls, and a natural guarded form of first-order quantification. We apply our approach for its axiomatisation. As a by-product of our method, we also establish the exact expressive power of this new logic and we show PSpace-completeness of its satisfiability problem
Stone-Type Dualities for Separation Logics
Stone-type duality theorems, which relate algebraic and
relational/topological models, are important tools in logic because -- in
addition to elegant abstraction -- they strengthen soundness and completeness
to a categorical equivalence, yielding a framework through which both algebraic
and topological methods can be brought to bear on a logic. We give a systematic
treatment of Stone-type duality for the structures that interpret bunched
logics, starting with the weakest systems, recovering the familiar BI and
Boolean BI (BBI), and extending to both classical and intuitionistic Separation
Logic. We demonstrate the uniformity and modularity of this analysis by
additionally capturing the bunched logics obtained by extending BI and BBI with
modalities and multiplicative connectives corresponding to disjunction,
negation and falsum. This includes the logic of separating modalities (LSM), De
Morgan BI (DMBI), Classical BI (CBI), and the sub-classical family of logics
extending Bi-intuitionistic (B)BI (Bi(B)BI). We additionally obtain as
corollaries soundness and completeness theorems for the specific Kripke-style
models of these logics as presented in the literature: for DMBI, the
sub-classical logics extending BiBI and a new bunched logic, Concurrent Kleene
BI (connecting our work to Concurrent Separation Logic), this is the first time
soundness and completeness theorems have been proved. We thus obtain a
comprehensive semantic account of the multiplicative variants of all standard
propositional connectives in the bunched logic setting. This approach
synthesises a variety of techniques from modal, substructural and categorical
logic and contextualizes the "resource semantics" interpretation underpinning
Separation Logic amongst them
Clausal Resolution for Modal Logics of Confluence
We present a clausal resolution-based method for normal multimodal logics of
confluence, whose Kripke semantics are based on frames characterised by
appropriate instances of the Church-Rosser property. Here we restrict attention
to eight families of such logics. We show how the inference rules related to
the normal logics of confluence can be systematically obtained from the
parametrised axioms that characterise such systems. We discuss soundness,
completeness, and termination of the method. In particular, completeness can be
modularly proved by showing that the conclusions of each newly added inference
rule ensures that the corresponding conditions on frames hold. Some examples
are given in order to illustrate the use of the method.Comment: 15 pages, 1 figure. Preprint of the paper accepted to IJCAR 201
On Bisimulations for Description Logics
We study bisimulations for useful description logics. The simplest among the
considered logics is (a variant of PDL). The others
extend that logic with inverse roles, nominals, quantified number restrictions,
the universal role, and/or the concept constructor for expressing the local
reflexivity of a role. They also allow role axioms. We give results about
invariance of concepts, TBoxes and ABoxes, preservation of RBoxes and knowledge
bases, and the Hennessy-Milner property w.r.t. bisimulations in the considered
description logics. Using the invariance results we compare the expressiveness
of the considered description logics w.r.t. concepts, TBoxes and ABoxes. Our
results about separating the expressiveness of description logics are naturally
extended to the case when instead of we have any sublogic
of that extends . We also provide results
on the largest auto-bisimulations and quotient interpretations w.r.t. such
equivalence relations. Such results are useful for minimizing interpretations
and concept learning in description logics. To deal with minimizing
interpretations for the case when the considered logic allows quantified number
restrictions and/or the constructor for the local reflexivity of a role, we
introduce a new notion called QS-interpretation, which is needed for obtaining
expected results. By adapting Hopcroft's automaton minimization algorithm and
the Paige-Tarjan algorithm, we give efficient algorithms for computing the
partition corresponding to the largest auto-bisimulation of a finite
interpretation.Comment: 42 page
Embedding Non-Ground Logic Programs into Autoepistemic Logic for Knowledge Base Combination
In the context of the Semantic Web, several approaches to the combination of
ontologies, given in terms of theories of classical first-order logic and rule
bases, have been proposed. They either cast rules into classical logic or limit
the interaction between rules and ontologies. Autoepistemic logic (AEL) is an
attractive formalism which allows to overcome these limitations, by serving as
a uniform host language to embed ontologies and nonmonotonic logic programs
into it. For the latter, so far only the propositional setting has been
considered. In this paper, we present three embeddings of normal and three
embeddings of disjunctive non-ground logic programs under the stable model
semantics into first-order AEL. While the embeddings all correspond with
respect to objective ground atoms, differences arise when considering
non-atomic formulas and combinations with first-order theories. We compare the
embeddings with respect to stable expansions and autoepistemic consequences,
considering the embeddings by themselves, as well as combinations with
classical theories. Our results reveal differences and correspondences of the
embeddings and provide useful guidance in the choice of a particular embedding
for knowledge combination.Comment: 52 pages, submitte
- …