40,565 research outputs found
Session 5: Development, Neuroscience and Evolutionary Psychology
Proceedings of the Pittsburgh Workshop in History and Philosophy of Biology, Center for Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh, March 23-24 2001 Session 5: Development, Neuroscience and Evolutionary Psycholog
evoText: A new tool for analyzing the biological sciences
We introduce here evoText, a new tool for automated analysis of the literature in the biological sciences. evoText contains a database of hundreds of thousands of journal articles and an array of analysis tools for generating quantitative data on the nature and history of life science, especially ecology and evolutionary biology. This article describes the features of evoText, presents a variety of examples of the kinds of analyses that evoText can run, and offers a brief tutorial describing how to use it
Computation Environments, An Interactive Semantics for Turing Machines (which P is not equal to NP considering it)
To scrutinize notions of computation and time complexity, we introduce and
formally define an interactive model for computation that we call it the
\emph{computation environment}. A computation environment consists of two main
parts: i) a universal processor and ii) a computist who uses the computability
power of the universal processor to perform effective procedures. The notion of
computation finds it meaning, for the computist, through his
\underline{interaction} with the universal processor.
We are interested in those computation environments which can be considered
as alternative for the real computation environment that the human being is its
computist. These computation environments must have two properties: 1- being
physically plausible, and 2- being enough powerful.
Based on Copeland' criteria for effective procedures, we define what a
\emph{physically plausible} computation environment is.
We construct two \emph{physically plausible} and \emph{enough powerful}
computation environments: 1- the Turing computation environment, denoted by
, and 2- a persistently evolutionary computation environment, denoted by
, which persistently evolve in the course of executing the computations.
We prove that the equality of complexity classes and
in the computation environment conflicts with the
\underline{free will} of the computist.
We provide an axiomatic system for Turing computability and
prove that ignoring just one of the axiom of , it would not be
possible to derive from the rest of axioms.
We prove that the computist who lives inside the environment , can never
be confident that whether he lives in a static environment or a persistently
evolutionary one.Comment: 33 pages, interactive computation, P vs N
Why is Open Access Development so Successful? Stigmergic organization and the economics of information
The explosive development of "free" or "open source" information goods
contravenes the conventional wisdom that markets and commercial organizations
are necessary to efficiently supply products. This paper proposes a theoretical
explanation for this phenomenon, using concepts from economics and theories of
self-organization. Once available on the Internet, information is intrinsically
not a scarce good, as it can be replicated virtually without cost. Moreover,
freely distributing information is profitable to its creator, since it improves
the quality of the information, and enhances the creator's reputation. This
provides a sufficient incentive for people to contribute to open access
projects. Unlike traditional organizations, open access communities are open,
distributed and self-organizing. Coordination is achieved through stigmergy:
listings of "work-in-progress" direct potential contributors to the tasks where
their contribution is most likely to be fruitful. This obviates the need both
for centralized planning and for the "invisible hand" of the market
- …