17 research outputs found

    ๋‹จ์ฒด๋ณตํ•ฉ์ฒด์—์„œ ์กฐํ™” ๊ณต๊ฐ„์˜ ์ด๋ก ๊ณผ ์‘์šฉ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)--์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› :์ž์—ฐ๊ณผํ•™๋Œ€ํ•™ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ๊ณผํ•™๋ถ€,2020. 2. ๊ตญ์›….A harmonic cycle ฮป, also called a discrete harmonic form, is a solution of the Laplace's equation with the combinatorial Laplace operator obtained from the boundary operators of a simplicial chain complex. By combinatorial Hodge theory, harmonic spaces are isomorphic to homology groups with real coefficients. In particular, if a cell complex has a reduced homology with Betti number ฮฒ_i = 1 of a specific dimension i, it has a unique harmonic cycle up to scalar multiplication, which we call the standard harmonic cycle. We will present a formula for the standard harmonic cycle ฮป of a cell complex based on a high-dimensional generalization of cycletrees. Moreover, by using duality, we will define the standard harmonic cocycle ฮป* and show intriguing combinatorial properties of ฮป and ฮป* in relation to (dual) spanning trees, (dual) cycletrees, winding numbers w( ยท ) and cutting numbers c( ยท ) in high dimensions. Finally, we will also suggest two application methods; an analysis to detect oscillations by using winding number, and cutting number, and a network embedding method, called harmonic mirroring.์กฐํ™” ์‚ฌ์ดํด ฮป๋Š” ์ด์‚ฐ ์กฐํ™” ํ˜•์‹์œผ๋กœ๋„ ๋ถ€๋ฅด๋ฉฐ ๋ผํ”Œ๋ผ์‹œ์•ˆ ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์˜ ํ•ด์ด๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ผํ”Œ๋ผ์‹œ์•ˆ ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์€ ๋‹จ์ฒด ์—ฐ์‡„๋ณตํ•ฉ์ฒด์˜ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„ ์ž‘์šฉ์†Œ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋งŒ๋“  ์กฐํ•ฉ๋ก ์  ๋ผํ”Œ๋ผ์‹œ์•ˆ ์ž‘์šฉ์†Œ๊ฐ€ 0์ผ ๋•Œ ์ƒ๊ธฐ๋Š” ์ˆ˜์‹์ด๋‹ค. ์กฐํ•ฉ๋ก ์  ํ˜ธ์ง€ ์ด๋ก ์— ์˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ์กฐํ™” ๊ณต๊ฐ„์€ ์‹ค์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์ˆ˜๋กœ ๊ฐ–๋Š” ํ˜ธ๋ชฐ๋กœ์ง€๊ตฐ๊ณผ ๋™ํ˜•์ด๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ์—ฐ์‡ ๋ณตํ•ฉ์ฒด์˜ ํŠน์ • ์ฐจ์› i์—์„œ ์ถ•์†Œ ํ˜ธ๋ชฐ๋ฆฌ์ง€๊ตฐ์˜ ๋ฒ ํ‹ฐ์ˆ˜ ฮฒ_i๊ฐ€ 1์ด๋ผ๋ฉด, ์Šค์นผ๋ผ๊ณฑ์„ ์ œ์™ธํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ถˆ๋ณ€ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ณ ์œ ํ•œ ์กฐํ™” ์‚ฌ์ดํด์„ ์–ป์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ณ , ์ด๋ฅผ ํ‘œ์ค€ ์กฐํ™” ์‚ฌ์ดํด์ด๋ผ ๋ถ€๋ฅธ๋‹ค. ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ํ‘œ์ค€ ์กฐํ™” ์‚ฌ์ดํด ฮป์„ ํ‘œํ˜„ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ณต์‹์„ ๊ณ ์ฐจ์›์œผ๋กœ ์ผ๋ฐ˜ํ™”๋œ ์‚ฌ์ดํด ํŠธ๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”์šฑ์ด, ์Œ๋Œ€์„ฑ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํ‘œ์ค€ ์กฐํ™” ์Œ๋Œ€์‚ฌ์ดํด ฮป*๋ฅผ ์ •์˜ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ฮป์™€ ฮป*์˜ ํฅ๋ฏธ๋กญ๊ณ  ์กฐํ•ฉ๋ก ์ ์ธ ์„ฑ์งˆ๋“ค์„ ๊ณ ์ฐจ์› ์ƒํƒœ์—์„œ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” (์Œ๋Œ€) ์ƒ์„ฑ๋‚˜๋ฌด์™€ (์Œ๋Œ€) ์‚ฌ์ดํด ํŠธ๋ฆฌ, ํšŒ์ „์ˆ˜ w( ยท ), ์ž๋ฆ„์ˆ˜ c( ยท )์™€์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ–๋Š”๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ์‘์šฉ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ๋‹ค. ํšŒ์ „์ˆ˜์™€ ์ž๋ฆ„์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์ง„๋™ ์ธก์ •๋ฒ•๊ณผ ์กฐํ™” ๋ฏธ๋Ÿฌ๋ง์œผ๋กœ ๋ถˆ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ๋งค์žฅ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด๋‹ค.1 Introduction 1 2 Preliminaries 3 2.1 Review of nite chain complex and (co)homology 3 2.2 High dimensional spanning trees 4 2.3 Harmonic space and combinatorial Hodge theory 5 3 Cycletree and its minimal cycle 7 3.1 Cycletree 7 3.2 Minimal cycle 9 4 Winding number 14 5 Standard harmonic cycle 17 6 Duality and dual spanning tree 20 7 Dual cycletree and cutting number 25 7.1 Dual cycletree and its minimal cocycle 25 7.2 Cutting number 27 8 Standard harmonic cocycle and relationship 31 9 Application 35 9.1 Oscillation Detection 35 9.2 Harmonic Mirroring 38 Abstract (in Korean) 41 Acknowledgement (in Korean) 42Docto

    Combinatorial and Hodge Laplacians: Similarity and Difference

    Full text link
    As key subjects in spectral geometry and combinatorial graph theory respectively, the (continuous) Hodge Laplacian and the combinatorial Laplacian share similarities in revealing the topological dimension and geometric shape of data and in their realization of diffusion and minimization of harmonic measures. It is believed that they also both associate with vector calculus, through the gradient, curl, and divergence, as argued in the popular usage of "Hodge Laplacians on graphs" in the literature. Nevertheless, these Laplacians are intrinsically different in their domains of definitions and applicability to specific data formats, hindering any in-depth comparison of the two approaches. To facilitate the comparison and bridge the gap between the combinatorial Laplacian and Hodge Laplacian for the discretization of continuous manifolds with boundary, we further introduce Boundary-Induced Graph (BIG) Laplacians using tools from Discrete Exterior Calculus (DEC). BIG Laplacians are defined on discrete domains with appropriate boundary conditions to characterize the topology and shape of data. The similarities and differences of the combinatorial Laplacian, BIG Laplacian, and Hodge Laplacian are then examined. Through an Eulerian representation of 3D domains as level-set functions on regular grids, we show experimentally the conditions for the convergence of BIG Laplacian eigenvalues to those of the Hodge Laplacian for elementary shapes.Comment: 26 page

    ๋ฐ˜์‘ ์–ต์ œ์˜ ๊ฐœ์ธ์ฐจ์™€ ๊ด€๋ จํ•œ ๋Œ€๊ทœ๋ชจ ํœด์ง€๊ธฐ ๋‡Œ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์ธ๋ฌธ๋Œ€ํ•™ ํ˜‘๋™๊ณผ์ • ์ธ์ง€๊ณผํ•™์ „๊ณต, 2020. 8. ์ด๋™์ˆ˜.Response inhibition is one of the essential cognitive functions and suppresses inappropriate responses for goal-directed behavior. When a brain is cognitively engaged, it enters a cognitive state that task-positive regions are activated, and the default mode network is deactivated (DMN). In contrast, DMN is activated, and task-positive regions are deactivated at rest. The transition between the states is important for the cognitive function, and recent studies have found that the salience network (SN) plays a crucial role in detecting and processing a salient signal and suppressing DMN at rest. It can be assumed that there exists optimized connectivity to perform response inhibition successfully and that it will also appear in resting-state requiring no cognitive effort. It was hypothesized that lower functional connectivity within SN and higher functional connectivity within DMN and greater anti-correlation between then is related to better response inhibition. The response inhibition of individuals was measured by the stop-signal task and the Stroop task. The correlation between intra-/inter-component functional connectivity derived from independent component analysis with dual regression and task performances were examined to test the hypothesis. The intra-/inter-component structural connectivity analysis using diffusion tensor imaging was conducted to provide a deeper understanding of functional connectivity. Topological characteristics of inter-component functional connectivity were also examined using the minimum spanning tree (MST) of each individual to provide a heuristic insight from the topological view. The results indicate that the functional connectivity within SN, but not DMN components, and the functional and structural connectivity between SN and DMN components are critical to elucidate individual differences in response inhibition. Higher structural connectivity but low functional connectivity of SN at rest was an important feature for superior response inhibition. The stronger structural connectivity and stronger anti-correlation between SN and DMN components were also indicative of better response inhibition. MST of a subject with the best performance showed direct connections between SN and anterior DMN/pDMN, whereas the MST of the one with the worst performance does not. These intra-/inter components connectivities reflect the organization of the brain that enables competent response inhibition and account for individual differences. This study might suggest that the individuals characteristics of large-scale network components at rest provide evidence to illustrate response inhibition of an individual without any experimental scan.๋ฐ˜์‘ ์–ต์ œ๋Š” ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ฃผ์š”ํ•œ ์ธ์ง€ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜์ด๋ฉฐ ์ด์ƒํ–‰๋™์„ ๋™๋ฐ˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ •์‹  ์งˆํ™˜๊ณผ๋„ ๊นŠ์€ ๊ด€๋ จ์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์ด์™€ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ์‹ ๊ฒฝ์  ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ํƒ๊ตฌํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ๋งค์šฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ์šฐ๋ฆฌ์˜ ๋‡Œ๋Š” ์–ด๋– ํ•œ ์ธ์ง€ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•  ๋•Œ, ์ž‘์—… ๊ด€๋ จ ์˜์—ญ๋“ค์„ ํ™œ์„ฑํ™”ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ž๊ธฐ ์ฐธ์กฐ์  ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ํ•˜๋Š” ๋””ํดํŠธ ๋ชจ๋“œ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ์˜์—ญ๋“ค์€ ๋น„ํ™œ์„ฑํ™”ํ•œ๋‹ค. ํœด์ง€๊ธฐ์—๋Š” ๋ฐ˜๋Œ€๋กœ ์ž‘์—… ๊ด€๋ จ ์˜์—ญ๋“ค์€ ๋น„ํ™œ์„ฑํ™”ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋””ํดํŠธ ๋ชจ๋“œ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ์˜์—ญ์€ ํ™œ์„ฑํ™”ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด์ฒ˜๋Ÿผ ์ธ์ง€ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ์ƒํƒœ๋ฅผ ํšจ์œจ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ „ํ™˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ํ˜„์ถœ์„ฑ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ (salience network)๋Š” ์–ด๋– ํ•œ ๊ณผ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•  ๋•Œ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์ž๊ทน์„ ํƒ์ง€ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌํ•˜๋ฉฐ ๋˜ํ•œ ๋””ํดํŠธ ๋ชจ๋“œ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์˜ ํ™œ์„ฑ์„ ์–ต์ œํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ƒํƒœ ๊ฐ„ ์ „ํ™˜์— ํ•ต์‹ฌ์ ์ธ ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ•˜๋Š” ๋Œ€๊ทœ๋ชจ ๋‡Œ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์ด๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์ด์™€ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์  ํŠน์„ฑ์ด ์ธ์ง€ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ๊ณผ ๋ฐ€์ ‘ํ•œ ๊ด€๋ จ์ด ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌํ•œ ํŠน์„ฑ์€ ํœด์ง€๊ธฐ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ์—๋„ ๋ฐ˜์˜๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ผ ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ฆ‰, ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋ฐ˜์‘ ์–ต์ œ์˜ ๊ฐœ์ธ์ฐจ๋ฅผ ํœด์ง€๊ธฐ ๋Œ€๊ทœ๋ชจ ๋‡Œ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ๋“ค์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์„ค๋ช…ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ฉฐ, ํŠนํžˆ ํ˜„์ถœ์„ฑ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์˜ ๋‚ฎ์€ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์  ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ, ๋””ํดํŠธ ๋ชจ๋“œ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์˜ ๋†’์€ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์  ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๊ทธ ๋‘˜ ๊ฐ„์˜ ๋†’์€ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์  ์—ญ ์ƒ๊ด€ (anti-correlation)์ด ๋ฐ˜์‘ ์–ต์ œ์— ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ์‚ฌ๋žŒ๋“ค์˜ ํŠน์ง•์ ์ธ ํœด์ง€๊ธฐ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ์ผ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ผ ๊ฐ€์„ค์„ ์„ธ์› ๋‹ค. ๊ฐœ์ธ์˜ ๋ฐ˜์‘ ์–ต์ œ๋Š” ์ •์ง€ ์‹ ํ˜ธ ๊ณผ์ œ์™€ ์ŠคํŠธ๋ฃน ๊ณผ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ธก์ •ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ํœด์ง€๊ธฐ ๋Œ€๊ทœ๋ชจ ๋‡Œ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ๋“ค์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ๋“ค๊ณผ ์–ด๋– ํ•œ ์ƒ๊ด€์„ ๊ฐ–๋Š”์ง€ ์•Œ์•„๋ณด์•˜๋‹ค. ์ฆ‰, ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์  ๋‡Œ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ๋‚ด์˜ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ๊ณผ ๋‘ ๋‡Œ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ๊ฐ„ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ์ด ๊ณผ์ œ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๊ณผ ์–ด๋– ํ•œ ์ƒ๊ด€์„ ๋ณด์ด๋Š”์ง€๋ฅผ ์•Œ์•„๋ณด์•˜๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์  ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ณด๋‹ค ๊นŠ์€ ์ดํ•ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ํ™•์‚ฐ ํ…์„œ ์˜์ƒ๊ณผ ํŠธ๋ž™ํ† ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ผ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ๊ณผ ๋ฐ˜์‘ ์–ต์ œ์™€์˜ ์ƒ๊ด€์„ ์•Œ์•„๋ณด์•˜๋‹ค. ๋ฐ˜์‘ ์–ต์ œ์™€ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ํ† ํด๋กœ์ง€ ํŠน์„ฑ ์—ญ์‹œ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ์•Œ์•„๋ณด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ฐธ์—ฌ์ž๋“ค์˜ ๋ฏธ๋‹ˆ๋ฉˆ ์ŠคํŒจ๋‹ ํŠธ๋ฆฌ(MST: minimum spanning tree)๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ํ˜„์ถœ์„ฑ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ํ˜„์ถœ์„ฑ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์™€ ๋””ํดํŠธ ๋ชจ๋“œ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ฐ˜์‘ ์–ต์ œ์˜ ๊ฐœ์ธ์ฐจ๋ฅผ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ํ˜„์ถœ์„ฑ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์˜ ์„ฑ๋ถ„ ๋‚ด ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ์€ ๊ฐ•ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ํœด์ง€๊ธฐ์˜ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์  ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ์ด ์•ฝํ•œ ์ฐธ์—ฌ์ž๋“ค์ผ์ˆ˜๋ก ๋ฐ˜์‘ ์–ต์ œ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰์ด ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ํ˜„์ถœ์„ฑ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์™€ ๋””ํดํŠธ ๋ชจ๋“œ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ๊ณผ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์  ์—ญ ์ƒ๊ด€์€ ๋ชจ๋‘ ๋†’์„์ˆ˜๋ก ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ๋ฐ˜์‘ ์–ต์ œ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋‘ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ๊ฐ„ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ์ด ๋†’์„์ˆ˜๋ก ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์  ์—ญ ์ƒ๊ด€์ด ๋†’์€ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ํ† ํด๋กœ์ง€ ๋ถ„์„์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰์ด ์ข‹์€ ์ฐธ์—ฌ์ž์˜ MST๋Š” ํ˜„์ถœ์„ฑ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์™€ ๋””ํดํŠธ ๋ชจ๋“œ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ๋“ค ๊ฐ„์— ์ง์ ‘์ ์ธ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์ด ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋‚˜ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰์ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋‚˜์œ ์ฐธ์—ฌ์ž์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ง์ ‘์ ์ธ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์ด ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๋‹ค. ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ํœด์ง€๊ธฐ์˜ ํ˜„์ถœ์„ฑ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ๋‚ด ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ํ˜„์ถœ์„ฑ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์™€ ๋””ํดํŠธ ๋ชจ๋“œ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์  ์—ญ ์ƒ๊ด€๊ณผ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ์ด ๋ฐ˜์‘ ์–ต์ œ์˜ ๊ฐœ์ธ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋‚˜, ๋””ํดํŠธ ๋ชจ๋“œ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ๋‚ด์˜ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ์€ ๊ทธ๋ ‡์ง€ ๋ชปํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๊ณผ์ œ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ ์ค‘์ด ์•„๋‹Œ ํœด์ง€๊ธฐ ๋™์•ˆ์˜ ๋‡Œ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ๋“ค์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ฐ˜์‘ ์–ต์ œ์˜ ๊ฐœ์ธ์ฐจ๋ฅผ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค€๋‹ค.1. Introduction 1 1.1. Response inhibition and its neural correlates 1 1.1.1. Cognitive tasks to measure response inhibition 1 1.1.2. The neural correlates of response inhibition 2 1.1.3. Response inhibition and resting-state brain 3 1.2. Investigations on large-scale networks underlying response inhibition 4 1.2.1. Resting-state networks and response inhibition 4 1.2.2. Structural connectivity 6 1.2.3. Topological characteristics 7 1.2.4. The aim of the present study 8 2. Methods 9 2.1. Subjects 9 2.2. Behavioral tasks to assess response inhibition 11 2.3. Brain imaging data acquisition and preprocessing 14 2.3.1. Resting-state fMRI 14 2.3.2. Diffusion tensor imaging 15 2.4. Resting-state networks and functional connectivity analysis 16 2.4.1. Group independent component analysis to identify resting-state networks 16 2.4.2. Dual regression to obtain subject-specific data of components 17 2.4.3. Estimation of subject-specific intra-/inter-component functional connectivity 21 2.5. Structural connectivity analysis 21 2.5.1. Structural connectivity and response inhibition 21 2.5.2. Relationship between functional connectivity and structural connectivity 22 2.6. Topological data analysis 25 2.6.1. Minimum spanning tree 25 3. Results 27 3.1. The performances of behavioral tasks 27 3.2. Intra-component connectivity and response inhibition 30 3.3. Inter-component connectivity and response inhibition 35 3.4. Relationship between functional connectivity and structural connectivity 41 3.5. Minimum spanning tree 43 4. Discussion 46 4.1. Resting-state network and cognition 46 4.2. Salience network and response inhibition 47 4.3. Connectivity and structural connectivity between SN and DMN 50 4.3.1. Functional connectivity between SN and DMN 50 4.3.2. Structural connectivity between SN and DMN 51 4.3.3. Topological characteristics between SN and DMN 53 4.4. Limitations of the study 54 5. Conclusion 56 References 57 ๊ตญ๋ฌธ ์ดˆ๋ก 70Docto

    Efficient 11-Laplacian Solvers for Well-Shaped Simplicial Complexes: Beyond Betti Numbers and Collapsing Sequences

    Full text link
    We present efficient algorithms for approximately solving systems of linear equations in 11-Laplacians of well-shaped simplicial complexes up to high precision. 11-Laplacians, or higher-dimensional Laplacians, generalize graph Laplacians to higher-dimensional simplicial complexes and play a key role in computational topology and topological data analysis. Previously, nearly-linear time approximate solvers were developed for simplicial complexes with known collapsing sequences and bounded Betti numbers, such as those triangulating a three-ball in R3\mathbb{R}^3 (Cohen, Fasy, Miller, Nayyeri, Peng, and Walkington [SODA'2014], Black, Maxwell, Nayyeri, and Winkelman [SODA'2022], Black and Nayyeri [ICALP'2022]). Furthermore, Nested Dissection provides quadratic time exact solvers for more general systems with nonzero structures representing well-shaped simplicial complexes embedded in R3\mathbb{R}^3. We generalize the specialized solvers for 11-Laplacians to simplicial complexes with additional geometric structures but without collapsing sequences and bounded Betti numbers, and we improve the runtime of Nested Dissection. We focus on simplicial complexes that meet two conditions: (1) each individual simplex has a bounded aspect ratio, and (2) they can be divided into "disjoint" and balanced regions with well-shaped interiors and boundaries. Our solvers draw inspiration from the Incomplete Nested Dissection for stiffness matrices of well-shaped trusses (Kyng, Peng, Schwieterman, and Zhang [STOC'2018]).Comment: 45 pages, 3 figures, ESA 202

    A COLLISION AVOIDANCE SYSTEM FOR AUTONOMOUS UNDERWATER VEHICLES

    Get PDF
    The work in this thesis is concerned with the development of a novel and practical collision avoidance system for autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs). Synergistically, advanced stochastic motion planning methods, dynamics quantisation approaches, multivariable tracking controller designs, sonar data processing and workspace representation, are combined to enhance significantly the survivability of modern AUVs. The recent proliferation of autonomous AUV deployments for various missions such as seafloor surveying, scientific data gathering and mine hunting has demanded a substantial increase in vehicle autonomy. One matching requirement of such missions is to allow all the AUV to navigate safely in a dynamic and unstructured environment. Therefore, it is vital that a robust and effective collision avoidance system should be forthcoming in order to preserve the structural integrity of the vehicle whilst simultaneously increasing its autonomy. This thesis not only provides a holistic framework but also an arsenal of computational techniques in the design of a collision avoidance system for AUVs. The design of an obstacle avoidance system is first addressed. The core paradigm is the application of the Rapidly-exploring Random Tree (RRT) algorithm and the newly developed version for use as a motion planning tool. Later, this technique is merged with the Manoeuvre Automaton (MA) representation to address the inherent disadvantages of the RRT. A novel multi-node version which can also address time varying final state is suggested. Clearly, the reference trajectory generated by the aforementioned embedded planner must be tracked. Hence, the feasibility of employing the linear quadratic regulator (LQG) and the nonlinear kinematic based state-dependent Ricatti equation (SDRE) controller as trajectory trackers are explored. The obstacle detection module, which comprises of sonar processing and workspace representation submodules, is developed and tested on actual sonar data acquired in a sea-trial via a prototype forward looking sonar (AT500). The sonar processing techniques applied are fundamentally derived from the image processing perspective. Likewise, a novel occupancy grid using nonlinear function is proposed for the workspace representation of the AUV. Results are presented that demonstrate the ability of an AUV to navigate a complex environment. To the author's knowledge, it is the first time the above newly developed methodologies have been applied to an A UV collision avoidance system, and, therefore, it is considered that the work constitutes a contribution of knowledge in this area of work.J&S MARINE LT

    Pattern Recognition

    Get PDF
    Pattern recognition is a very wide research field. It involves factors as diverse as sensors, feature extraction, pattern classification, decision fusion, applications and others. The signals processed are commonly one, two or three dimensional, the processing is done in real- time or takes hours and days, some systems look for one narrow object class, others search huge databases for entries with at least a small amount of similarity. No single person can claim expertise across the whole field, which develops rapidly, updates its paradigms and comprehends several philosophical approaches. This book reflects this diversity by presenting a selection of recent developments within the area of pattern recognition and related fields. It covers theoretical advances in classification and feature extraction as well as application-oriented works. Authors of these 25 works present and advocate recent achievements of their research related to the field of pattern recognition
    corecore