20 research outputs found
Graph Treewidth and Geometric Thickness Parameters
Consider a drawing of a graph in the plane such that crossing edges are
coloured differently. The minimum number of colours, taken over all drawings of
, is the classical graph parameter "thickness". By restricting the edges to
be straight, we obtain the "geometric thickness". By further restricting the
vertices to be in convex position, we obtain the "book thickness". This paper
studies the relationship between these parameters and treewidth.
Our first main result states that for graphs of treewidth , the maximum
thickness and the maximum geometric thickness both equal .
This says that the lower bound for thickness can be matched by an upper bound,
even in the more restrictive geometric setting. Our second main result states
that for graphs of treewidth , the maximum book thickness equals if and equals if . This refutes a conjecture of Ganley and
Heath [Discrete Appl. Math. 109(3):215-221, 2001]. Analogous results are proved
for outerthickness, arboricity, and star-arboricity.Comment: A preliminary version of this paper appeared in the "Proceedings of
the 13th International Symposium on Graph Drawing" (GD '05), Lecture Notes in
Computer Science 3843:129-140, Springer, 2006. The full version was published
in Discrete & Computational Geometry 37(4):641-670, 2007. That version
contained a false conjecture, which is corrected on page 26 of this versio
Decomposition of Geometric Graphs into Star Forests
We solve a problem of Dujmovi\'c and Wood (2007) by showing that a complete
convex geometric graph on vertices cannot be decomposed into fewer than
star-forests, each consisting of noncrossing edges. This bound is clearly
tight. We also discuss similar questions for abstract graphs
Proximity Drawings of High-Degree Trees
A drawing of a given (abstract) tree that is a minimum spanning tree of the
vertex set is considered aesthetically pleasing. However, such a drawing can
only exist if the tree has maximum degree at most 6. What can be said for trees
of higher degree? We approach this question by supposing that a partition or
covering of the tree by subtrees of bounded degree is given. Then we show that
if the partition or covering satisfies some natural properties, then there is a
drawing of the entire tree such that each of the given subtrees is drawn as a
minimum spanning tree of its vertex set
Crossing Minimization for 1-page and 2-page Drawings of Graphs with Bounded Treewidth
We investigate crossing minimization for 1-page and 2-page book drawings. We
show that computing the 1-page crossing number is fixed-parameter tractable
with respect to the number of crossings, that testing 2-page planarity is
fixed-parameter tractable with respect to treewidth, and that computing the
2-page crossing number is fixed-parameter tractable with respect to the sum of
the number of crossings and the treewidth of the input graph. We prove these
results via Courcelle's theorem on the fixed-parameter tractability of
properties expressible in monadic second order logic for graphs of bounded
treewidth.Comment: Graph Drawing 201
Relating Graph Thickness to Planar Layers and Bend Complexity
The thickness of a graph with vertices is the minimum number of
planar subgraphs of whose union is . A polyline drawing of in
is a drawing of , where each vertex is mapped to a
point and each edge is mapped to a polygonal chain. Bend and layer complexities
are two important aesthetics of such a drawing. The bend complexity of
is the maximum number of bends per edge in , and the layer complexity
of is the minimum integer such that the set of polygonal chains in
can be partitioned into disjoint sets, where each set corresponds
to a planar polyline drawing. Let be a graph of thickness . By
F\'{a}ry's theorem, if , then can be drawn on a single layer with bend
complexity . A few extensions to higher thickness are known, e.g., if
(resp., ), then can be drawn on layers with bend complexity 2
(resp., ). However, allowing a higher number of layers may reduce the
bend complexity, e.g., complete graphs require layers to be drawn
using 0 bends per edge.
In this paper we present an elegant extension of F\'{a}ry's theorem to draw
graphs of thickness . We first prove that thickness- graphs can be
drawn on layers with bends per edge. We then develop another
technique to draw thickness- graphs on layers with bend complexity,
i.e., , where . Previously, the bend complexity was not known to be sublinear for
. Finally, we show that graphs with linear arboricity can be drawn on
layers with bend complexity .Comment: A preliminary version appeared at the 43rd International Colloquium
on Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP 2016
Stack-number is not bounded by queue-number
We describe a family of graphs with queue-number at most 4 but unbounded
stack-number. This resolves open problems of Heath, Leighton and Rosenberg
(1992) and Blankenship and Oporowski (1999)
Drawings of Planar Graphs with Few Slopes and Segments
We study straight-line drawings of planar graphs with few segments and few
slopes. Optimal results are obtained for all trees. Tight bounds are obtained
for outerplanar graphs, 2-trees, and planar 3-trees. We prove that every
3-connected plane graph on vertices has a plane drawing with at most
segments and at most slopes. We prove that every cubic
3-connected plane graph has a plane drawing with three slopes (and three bends
on the outerface). In a companion paper, drawings of non-planar graphs with few
slopes are also considered.Comment: This paper is submitted to a journal. A preliminary version appeared
as "Really Straight Graph Drawings" in the Graph Drawing 2004 conference. See
http://arxiv.org/math/0606446 for a companion pape