To Preference via Entrenchment

We introduce a simple generalization of Gardenfors and Makinson's epistemic entrenchment called partial entrenchment. We show that preferential inference can be generated as the sceptical counterpart of an inference mechanism defined directly on partial entrenchment.Comment: 16 page

Properties of ABA+ for Non-Monotonic Reasoning

We investigate properties of ABA+, a formalism that extends the well studied structured argumentation formalism Assumption-Based Argumentation (ABA) with a preference handling mechanism. In particular, we establish desirable properties that ABA+ semantics exhibit. These pave way to the satisfaction by ABA+ of some (arguably) desirable principles of preference handling in argumentation and nonmonotonic reasoning, as well as non-monotonic inference properties of ABA+ under various semantics.Comment: This is a revised version of the paper presented at the worksho

El sistema de Poole: un estudio formal

Con el auge de la Inteligencia Artificial comenzaron a proliferar, a partir de la década de los 80, sistemas cuyo objetivo es reconstruir formalmente el razonamiento revocable. Los sistemas de Poole y Reiter se inscriben en esta vertiente. El estudio metateórico de los sistemas para razonamiento revocable condujo a Gabbay, Makinson y otros a definir propiedades debilitadas como la monotonía cauta, la monotonía racional, etc.: propiedades positivas mínimas esperables en sistemas no-monótonos. En el presente trabajo proponemos algunas definiciones alternativas y ofrecemos pruebas que evidencian ventajas comparativas del sistema de Poole

Preferential and Preferential-discriminative Consequence relations

The present paper investigates consequence relations that are both non-monotonic and paraconsistent. More precisely, we put the focus on preferential consequence relations, i.e. those relations that can be defined by a binary preference relation on states labelled by valuations. We worked with a general notion of valuation that covers e.g. the classical valuations as well as certain kinds of many-valued valuations. In the many-valued cases, preferential consequence relations are paraconsistant (in addition to be non-monotonic), i.e. they are capable of drawing reasonable conclusions which contain contradictions. The first purpose of this paper is to provide in our general framework syntactic characterizations of several families of preferential relations. The second and main purpose is to provide, again in our general framework, characterizations of several families of preferential discriminative consequence relations. They are defined exactly as the plain version, but any conclusion such that its negation is also a conclusion is rejected (these relations bring something new essentially in the many-valued cases).Comment: team Logic and Complexity, written in 2004-200